Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:29 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:22 am
Posts: 130
I read on internet that suggests that logic is like EVERYTHING.. .and common.. .sense.. .is not reliable,but as I experience in my life that is usually not the case because our scope of logic is limited only to our own viewpoints while common sense.. . is.. .like the collective mutual subconscious agreement among human being about what is plausible and what is not.. .I admit that common sense alone is not exactly good.. .(there is a lot of things that are not agreeable.. . by a significant number of.. .population for example which religion is real.. .),logic by it's own is not exactly the best because we are only trapped by our.. .own.. .scope of the situation.. .Thoughts?.. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
Logic is about correct reasoning and not about deciding what is true or false, good or bad.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
"Correct reasoning" sounds a little dangerous to me. Rather, logic is reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1014
http://books.google.com/books?id=MPSL-A ... &q&f=false

Tough going - good luck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:22 am
Posts: 130
.. .
so what if there is no strict.. .principles of validity that is known?.. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:51 pm 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 am
Posts: 997
Location: North Queensland, Australia
GarcherLancelot wrote:
.. .
so what if there is no strict.. .principles of validity that is known?.. .

Logic has a set of rules to play by, like maths or chess - even better, like a computer programme.
If you apply those rules carefully to true statements, you can come up with new statements which are pretty well guaranteed to be true.
If you apply then to false statements or apply them wrongly, you will come up with new statements which are false. The old GIGO rule always holds true: Garbage In, Garbage Out.

Commonsense is, as you almost say, accumulated knowledge which has been internalised because it generally works well. But it is specific to each community in both time and space. To us now, it is common sense that germs cause disease; to our great-great grandparents is was a novel idea, and to New Guinea tribesmen is is crazy - everyone knows malign spirits cause disease.

Both logic and commonsense are useful. Use them wisely!

:namaste:
Kim


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 417
Location: East Coast of Canada
GarcherLancelot wrote:
.. .
so what if there is no strict.. .principles of validity that is known?.. .

That's a bit like saying "what if 1+1 was not equal to 2?" Well, it is. The principles of logic are equally well-defined.

The flaw with common sense is that it often ignores this fact.

Om mani padme hum
Keith


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:41 am
Posts: 2776
Quote:
everyone knows malign spirits cause disease...

But but but didn't you know that nagas causes sicknesses?
That the particular spirit caused the mad cow disease back then?
That it could harm the lives of teachers?
Isn't it plain logical to you?
The joy of reading from certain E-Sangha posters... :mrgreen:

_________________
TWTB BIES OCB DDM BWF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:31 am
Posts: 1934
Location: Sydney AU
There are things which surpass reason - as Buddhism well knows - but in human affairs it is far more often the case that we fall short of it.

_________________
Learn to do good, refrain from evil, purify the mind ~ this is the teaching of the Buddhas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:22 am
Posts: 130
WHat.. . I mean is what if there is not strict and valid way to understand a certain issue that is known to that person?.. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
jeeprs wrote:
There are things which surpass reason - as Buddhism well knows - but in human affairs it is far more often the case that we fall short of it.


This is not true for the simple reason that all "things" have a purpose and all purposes are limited.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group