A couple thoughts:Sherab Dorje wrote:That it is high time that you moved on to a more constructive view?Sönam wrote:Yeaaah ... there is more than 50 years I know much about Palestinian and story of this part of the world. I'm born 48 ... does it tell you something ?Good. So then you know that Moses lead an invasion on the people living in Palestine.LOL!!! ... my father was jewish, my family is a well known (since more than 500 years) family of cantors. Ask google with my name, you will learn about. Do you pretend to know more the story of Moses and so on ?So you agree that the Israeli state has no valid historical claim on the land.Of course I know all that. It is standard knowledge. Muslims can trace what they want, but they start as a religious group with Mohamet and the Koran ... that of course I've read. On the land of Israel some shepferd, philistins, coming from an area which is today Jordania (btw stollen by the present dynasty to the peoples of Palestine - Philistins).So then you agree that the Palestinian issue is not an issue with Islam, since an Islamic king can also be a supporter of Israel.But of course not all of them. For exemple, I've been living 10 years in Morrocco (so I know a bit muslims and so on) and Mohamed V, great father of the present king (nbr 6) is considered in Israel as a righteous person (just) ... but you certainly know also position of Morrocco in the Palestinian/Israelian conflict.No, the only protection against Jihadists is to support liberal Islamic states. You see, Islam is not going to disapppear, actually it is increasing in popularity, so to avoid Islamic fundamentalism one must support Islamic liberalism.Israel is the only protection (our protection, starting with Greece which is not far away) to the Jihhad in Europa.
See if Europe wanted to stem the growth of Islamic fundamentalism in Turkey (for example), then it would have been infinitely more intelligent to have allowed Turkey to become a member of the economic union back when Turkey had a Kemalist (secular) government, or at the beginning of Erdogans (Islamicist) "reign". Instead it chose to side with Israel (out of European feelings of guilt for their massacre of the Jewish people) and thus forced Turkey into a firmly anti-Israel position.
You don't make friends by treating people as enemies. It just doesn't work.
The Moses story is mythology, pure and simple, and in my opinion has no role being taken seriously in a Buddhist discussion group except as an explanation for fundamentalism.
I think Europe is uneasy about Turkey for a lot of geopolitical reasons which don't have a whole lot to do with Israel. Certainly, Europeans I've spoken who aren't especially pro-Israel seemed pretty ambivalent there. To the extent Turkey's been moving away from Israel (and the fact that they used to have military ties with the Jewish state is more evidence that Muslims can have peaceful relations with the Jewish state when there are political incentives for such) that's probably less with being forced into that position by Europe then a matter of changing Turkish demographics and Erdogan's desire to make Turkey as an Islamic regional leader.
I do think there's an interesting discussion here, though, about what non-Muslims can do to discourage Islamic Fundamentalism. I'd broadly agree with Sherab Dorje that its very much in Western interests to encourage Islamic liberalism, as well as diversity in Islamic thought (one analyst has suggested that the West should support fringe Islamic practices like shamanism in that regard.)