Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Many thanks for such nutritious food for thought by so many of you. Internet is truly remarkable sometimes.
VP
VP
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Because there is no Vajrayana without a Guru.dude wrote:Why not?
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Place faith in the Dharma, not fallible humans.
Be your own teacher.
Be your own teacher.
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
It just means that the teacher him/herself fell prey to deluded experience. We all fall prey to deluded experience daily even if we are on the bhumis. However most teachers should be beyond ethical misconduct (or at least some teachers).Vajrapine wrote:Ethical misconduct.Pema Rigdzin wrote:Do you mean this teacher has failed in terms of participating in some ethical misconduct, or that you're not seeing results after following this teacher?
As has been mentioned, dust yourself off, find a teacher that you respect and move on.
Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Malcolm wrote:dude wrote: Let's move forward as "good friends," neither master nor disciple, but fellow practioners in mutual support to seek the correct path.
This attitude does not really work in Vajrayāna.
Assuming that teacher was Vajrapine's Guru. In Vajrayana you can have lots of teachers in a wider sense without seeing each and every one of them as your Guru.
I've had my share of disappointments, too, like most of us. Looking back I must say that in most cases I jumped into the student-teacher-relationship much too fast and much too naively.
"I struggled with some demons, They were middle class and tame..." L. Cohen
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
So if you are your own teacher - isn't that a fallible human??Indrajala wrote:Place faith in the Dharma, not fallible humans.
Be your own teacher.
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Those two statements are what the Buddha taught. Of course oneself is (probably) a fallible sentient being. This is why one needs a spiritual friend (kalyāṇa-mitra) even in the lower schools. However a guru in Vajrayana does not negate these teachings and lineage holders teach this as well. One has to walk the path and generate wisdom on one's own. But if one has lost confidence in a teacher then one must find another teacher that one has confidence in. Of course one still has to keep samaya.justsit wrote:So if you are your own teacher - isn't that a fallible human??Indrajala wrote:Place faith in the Dharma, not fallible humans.
Be your own teacher.
Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
I wholeheartedly agree with you.heart wrote:Because there is no Vajrayana without a Guru.dude wrote:Why not?
/magnus
However, the issue here is a case in which the teacher fails.
As good friends, we are by no means a substitute for a real teacher.
What I'm suggesting here is that we, as fellow practitioners, have a vital role to play in sharing our experience in mutual support to help each other find the way forward in such a distressing situation.
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Being disappointed in yourself for not learning Dharma properly is less devastating than being crushed by an immoral teacher, generally speaking.justsit wrote:So if you are your own teacher - isn't that a fallible human??Indrajala wrote:Place faith in the Dharma, not fallible humans.
Be your own teacher.
My point is that the real refuge is Dharma, not people. This is why I say that liberation does not require having a guru-disciple relationship. Someone who teaches you to read or meditate is fine, but unconditional faith in a guru is unnecessary for liberation itself (bear in mind I'm not talking about Buddhahood here). There's a difference between having spiritual friends and then trying to cultivate unconditional faith in a fallible human being.
I'm aware folks from Tibetan Buddhism will tend to disagree with this, but then I see how disappointed Tibetan Buddhists can be with their gurus. Some spend years and years with someone only to be emotionally and spiritually devastated.
I don't think that is supposed to be part of the path. You might suggest we thoroughly investigate a teacher before committing to them, but then why does that process even have to exist and be so continually restated? Because people inevitably falter?
You can avoid a lot of neurosis just by studying things on your own and developing your own discerning wisdom rather than continually relying on others.
- Adamantine
- Former staff member
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
- Location: Space is the Place
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Indrajala, this is posted in the Tibetan Buddhism subforum. It is insincere to answer the question posted in this subforum and act like you are not talking to Tibetan Buddhists. Of course in our tradition, as you know well, a Guru is indispensable. So you are merely, in a circuitous way, promoting another tradition (most likely your own), which when done in the Tibetan Buddhist subforum becomes the activity of a troll.Indrajala wrote: I'm aware folks from Tibetan Buddhism will tend to disagree with this, but then I see how disappointed Tibetan Buddhists can be with their gurus.
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
- Adamantine
- Former staff member
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
- Location: Space is the Place
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Actually in Tibetan Buddhism traditionally great emphasis is placed on examining one's prospective guru for many years to discern their true qualities, not just the qualities they may try to be showing outwardly like actors or actresses. Patrul Rinpoche in WOMPT recommends a period of 12 years.
"By not examining a teacher with great care
The faithful waste their gathered merit.
Like taking for the shadow of a tree a vicious snake,
Beguiled, they lose the freedom they at last had found."
Among the many types of teachers he warns against, one category is Teachers like a millstone made of wood:
"Even if they have studied, reflected and meditated a little, they did so not with any pure intention of working for future lives but for more mundane reasons- like preventing the priestly fiefs of which they are incumbents from falling into decay. As for training disciples, they are about as well suited to fulfilling their proper function as a millstone made of wood."
There is an extensive list. . .
But regarding finding a true guide, he has this to say:
"After examining him carefully and making an unmistaken assessment, from the moment you find a teacher has all the positive qualities mentioned
you should never cease to consider him to be the Buddha in person. This teacher in whom all the attributes are complete is the embodiment of the compassionate
wisdom of all Buddhas of the ten directions, appearing in the form of an ordinary human simply to benefit beings. . . .
So that such a true teacher may skilfully guide the ordinary people needing his help, he makes his everyday conduct conform to that of ordinary people. But
in reality his wisdom mind is that of a Buddha, so he is utterly different from everyone else. Each of his acts is simply the activity of a realized being attuned to the nature of those he has to benefit. He is therefore uniquely noble. Skilled in cutting through hesitation and doubt, he patiently endures all the ingratitude and discouragement of his disciples, like a mother with her only child."
"By not examining a teacher with great care
The faithful waste their gathered merit.
Like taking for the shadow of a tree a vicious snake,
Beguiled, they lose the freedom they at last had found."
Among the many types of teachers he warns against, one category is Teachers like a millstone made of wood:
"Even if they have studied, reflected and meditated a little, they did so not with any pure intention of working for future lives but for more mundane reasons- like preventing the priestly fiefs of which they are incumbents from falling into decay. As for training disciples, they are about as well suited to fulfilling their proper function as a millstone made of wood."
There is an extensive list. . .
But regarding finding a true guide, he has this to say:
"After examining him carefully and making an unmistaken assessment, from the moment you find a teacher has all the positive qualities mentioned
you should never cease to consider him to be the Buddha in person. This teacher in whom all the attributes are complete is the embodiment of the compassionate
wisdom of all Buddhas of the ten directions, appearing in the form of an ordinary human simply to benefit beings. . . .
So that such a true teacher may skilfully guide the ordinary people needing his help, he makes his everyday conduct conform to that of ordinary people. But
in reality his wisdom mind is that of a Buddha, so he is utterly different from everyone else. Each of his acts is simply the activity of a realized being attuned to the nature of those he has to benefit. He is therefore uniquely noble. Skilled in cutting through hesitation and doubt, he patiently endures all the ingratitude and discouragement of his disciples, like a mother with her only child."
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Are you suggesting that a troll is anyone who questions tradition.... who might call a spade a spade. This discussion specifically is off the grid regarding tradition and enlightened activity. There is ample evidence of misconduct being ignored in every tradition and all you can say is the guru is indispensable. this is 2013, think again.Adamantine wrote:Indrajala, this is posted in the Tibetan Buddhism subforum. It is insincere to answer the question posted in this subforum and act like you are not talking to Tibetan Buddhists. Of course in our tradition, as you know well, a Guru is indispensable. So you are merely, in a circuitous way, promoting another tradition (most likely your own), which when done in the Tibetan Buddhist subforum becomes the activity of a troll.Indrajala wrote: I'm aware folks from Tibetan Buddhism will tend to disagree with this, but then I see how disappointed Tibetan Buddhists can be with their gurus.
Not last night,
not this morning,
melon flowers bloomed.
~ Bassho
not this morning,
melon flowers bloomed.
~ Bassho
- Adamantine
- Former staff member
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
- Location: Space is the Place
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
False gurus, imposters, pretenders, charlatans, posers, half-baked, partially-realized-- all sorts of people like this have been vying for the power, potential wealth and access of the role of a Vajrayana Guru for thousands of years.. that is why so much emphasis has been placed on using discrimination to discern who is a true guide and who is not-- by Patrul Rinpoche and all the authentic guides of old Tibet. This is not a new issue, or a new problem. Samsara has been around for a long time. So has the degenerate age.. 2013 is not terribly original.Lindama wrote:Are you suggesting that a troll is anyone who questions tradition.... who might call a spade a spade. This discussion specifically is off the grid regarding tradition and enlightened activity. There is ample evidence of misconduct being ignored in every tradition and all you can say is the guru is indispensable. this is 2013, think again.Adamantine wrote:Indrajala, this is posted in the Tibetan Buddhism subforum. It is insincere to answer the question posted in this subforum and act like you are not talking to Tibetan Buddhists. Of course in our tradition, as you know well, a Guru is indispensable. So you are merely, in a circuitous way, promoting another tradition (most likely your own), which when done in the Tibetan Buddhist subforum becomes the activity of a troll.Indrajala wrote: I'm aware folks from Tibetan Buddhism will tend to disagree with this, but then I see how disappointed Tibetan Buddhists can be with their gurus.
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
- Adamantine
- Former staff member
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
- Location: Space is the Place
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Nope. Read again.Lindama wrote: Are you suggesting that a troll is anyone who questions tradition....
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
I am fine with that. The way forward, in my experience, is to focus on the general Mahayana Dharma. See if it have truth, if it is valid, just like Indrajala suggested actually. However, I don't know to much about this particular case. What feels like sexual misconduct can be just a case of assuming something that wasn't so, like thinking your Lama is a monk/nun, when it just isn't so.dude wrote:I wholeheartedly agree with you.heart wrote:Because there is no Vajrayana without a Guru.dude wrote:Why not?
/magnus
However, the issue here is a case in which the teacher fails.
As good friends, we are by no means a substitute for a real teacher.
What I'm suggesting here is that we, as fellow practitioners, have a vital role to play in sharing our experience in mutual support to help each other find the way forward in such a distressing situation.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Being disappointed with your Guru is often just having assumptions about what a Guru is. Just like people have assumptions of how a monk/nun is. We often imagine that they are beyond ordinary human emotions of desire, anger and ignorance when it is quite obvious that very few people on this earth are beyond that, if any. What we expect of monks/nuns is that they do their best, work with it, because that is what the robe is in the end a sign of putting on a effort of living a spiritual life. A Vajrayana Guru might be a monk or a nun and then we should expect some effort from their side as well. But very often they are not monks/nuns. The might have a girlfriend or a boyfriend or one of each. They might change partner like their underwear, or they might be terribly in love with one of their students but never doing anything about it. The question is how much of this that is our business? Is it heartbreaking when you find out about it? Yes, but that is because we had assumptions that didn't fit reality. You have to be extremely careful and intelligent when approaching a Guru and also you have to be quite clear what you find acceptable and what you find unacceptable. I read an article , many years ago, about sexual scandals in American Zen centers and it was pretty amazing the amount of scandals. Seemed almost no center that didn't have at least one sex scandal. Humans are slaves to their desire, anger and ignorance then they put on a robe of some kind, what changed except the clothes? Putting on an effort for sure means you will sometimes fail, probably very often. This is true for westerners and Tibetans alike.Indrajala wrote: Being disappointed in yourself for not learning Dharma properly is less devastating than being crushed by an immoral teacher, generally speaking.
My point is that the real refuge is Dharma, not people. This is why I say that liberation does not require having a guru-disciple relationship. Someone who teaches you to read or meditate is fine, but unconditional faith in a guru is unnecessary for liberation itself (bear in mind I'm not talking about Buddhahood here). There's a difference between having spiritual friends and then trying to cultivate unconditional faith in a fallible human being.
I'm aware folks from Tibetan Buddhism will tend to disagree with this, but then I see how disappointed Tibetan Buddhists can be with their gurus. Some spend years and years with someone only to be emotionally and spiritually devastated.
I don't think that is supposed to be part of the path. You might suggest we thoroughly investigate a teacher before committing to them, but then why does that process even have to exist and be so continually restated? Because people inevitably falter?
You can avoid a lot of neurosis just by studying things on your own and developing your own discerning wisdom rather than continually relying on others.
And Indrajala, I have a hunch you will end up in Vajrayana eventually. It is the ultimate challenge for clever guys.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
Folks from Tibetan Buddhism will not simply tend to disagree with this.Indrajala wrote:Being disappointed in yourself for not learning Dharma properly is less devastating than being crushed by an immoral teacher, generally speaking.justsit wrote:So if you are your own teacher - isn't that a fallible human??Indrajala wrote:Place faith in the Dharma, not fallible humans.
Be your own teacher.
My point is that the real refuge is Dharma, not people. This is why I say that liberation does not require having a guru-disciple relationship. Someone who teaches you to read or meditate is fine, but unconditional faith in a guru is unnecessary for liberation itself (bear in mind I'm not talking about Buddhahood here). There's a difference between having spiritual friends and then trying to cultivate unconditional faith in a fallible human being.
I'm aware folks from Tibetan Buddhism will tend to disagree with this, but then I see how disappointed Tibetan Buddhists can be with their gurus. Some spend years and years with someone only to be emotionally and spiritually devastated.
I don't think that is supposed to be part of the path. You might suggest we thoroughly investigate a teacher before committing to them, but then why does that process even have to exist and be so continually restated? Because people inevitably falter?
You can avoid a lot of neurosis just by studying things on your own and developing your own discerning wisdom rather than continually relying on others.
They will realise that it is a critique from someone who has no first hand experiential knowledge about that of which he opines.
Furthermore someone who shows signs of being conflicted and confused.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
No, actually I just look at new posts without really looking at which subforum they are in.Adamantine wrote: Indrajala, this is posted in the Tibetan Buddhism subforum. It is insincere to answer the question posted in this subforum and act like you are not talking to Tibetan Buddhists.
Only for the Vajrayana side. Tibetan Buddhism has the teachings of the Buddha plus the eminent philosophers like Nagarjuna, all of which can be studied on their own without a guru.Of course in our tradition, as you know well, a Guru is indispensable.
As I've said before, I don't have a tradition. I'm simply Buddhist and leave it at that.So you are merely, in a circuitous way, promoting another tradition (most likely your own), which when done in the Tibetan Buddhist subforum becomes the activity of a troll.
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
I've never had the experience of being deeply shattered because of unwise faith placed in someone.Simon E. wrote: Folks from Tibetan Buddhism will not simply tend to disagree with this.
They will realise that it is a critique from someone who has no first hand experiential knowledge about that of which he opines.
Your projections, buddy, not mine.Furthermore someone who shows signs of being conflicted and confused.
Re: Getting back on track after a failing teacher
I am pretty sure someone you trusted broke your heart. It happens everywhere in life, it is a part of life.Indrajala wrote:I've never had the experience of being deeply shattered because of unwise faith placed in someone.Simon E. wrote: Folks from Tibetan Buddhism will not simply tend to disagree with this.
They will realise that it is a critique from someone who has no first hand experiential knowledge about that of which he opines.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)