Awareness of awareness
- monktastic
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:48 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Awareness of awareness
Consider some particular experience: say, the experience of a sound (perhaps a bell).
What is this experience like before awareness "picks it up" or "awares" it?
Is it just a really, really, quiet experience of a bell?
No, I think it's not fair to call that hypothetical thing "an experience" at all.
Doesn't this suggest that what we're calling "awareness" is a fundamental constituent of this "experience of a bell?" A sine qua non? (And moreover, if awareness is truly a fundamental constituent of experience, why does some other awareness have to come in from elsewhere and take the experience as an object? That would be some wasted effort, I think.)
So if we can't truly separate out awareness from the supposed objects of awareness, why does it seem like we can?
To answer that, some experience helps, I think. Then, perhaps what it even means to be "aware of awareness" may make a little more sense.
PS, if you missed dzogchungpa's link: http://www.sandoth.com/Dogzen.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"
What is this experience like before awareness "picks it up" or "awares" it?
Is it just a really, really, quiet experience of a bell?
No, I think it's not fair to call that hypothetical thing "an experience" at all.
Doesn't this suggest that what we're calling "awareness" is a fundamental constituent of this "experience of a bell?" A sine qua non? (And moreover, if awareness is truly a fundamental constituent of experience, why does some other awareness have to come in from elsewhere and take the experience as an object? That would be some wasted effort, I think.)
So if we can't truly separate out awareness from the supposed objects of awareness, why does it seem like we can?
To answer that, some experience helps, I think. Then, perhaps what it even means to be "aware of awareness" may make a little more sense.
PS, if you missed dzogchungpa's link: http://www.sandoth.com/Dogzen.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"
This undistracted state of ordinary mind
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Awareness of awareness
Bodhisattva does not see object as actual object; they see empty nature of object. That's why they are not attached to object yet at the same time they see object. When wavered form gives rise to mind, and mind gives rise to form. Wavered is wavered by the false view of form as actual object, false view of mind as actual object by using mind to grasp mind as if there is something there to be obtained...yup I do it all the time.
It’s eye blinking.
Re: Awareness of awareness
Sounds interesting. I love "remixing" ancient traditions. I do it all the time ... in dharma and music.monktastic wrote:http://www.sandoth.com/Dogzen.htm
So how do I learn the DZ technique? I'd like to give 'er a spin, see what's what ...
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Awareness of awareness
This is what I've been calling a subtle object. As long as there is anything to see, anything ... there's an object there. Even if the object is ... emptiness of objects.LastLegend wrote:Bodhisattva does not see object as actual object; they see empty nature of object.
That's why seeing awareness sounds impossible to me. Awareness is not an object, it is pure receptivity. Seeing cannot set its sights on a non-object.
It's like what Anam Thubten says: You can never find the ground of being. But it is who you really are.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Awareness of awareness
It's possible that you are the object yourself. When you hears sound, is the sound different from you? If you are different from the sound, then the sound is the object of awareness. If you are not different from the sound, what is there to be aware of? Not awareness of awareness because there is still division and separation if you are still aware of your awareness.
If you are the object yourself, there is nothing else to be aware of besides being aware of yourself, but you are not even aware of yourself because there is no need to in relation to other object. There is no other object because you are the object... at this, it's hard to fathom.
If you are the object yourself, there is nothing else to be aware of besides being aware of yourself, but you are not even aware of yourself because there is no need to in relation to other object. There is no other object because you are the object... at this, it's hard to fathom.
Last edited by LastLegend on Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It’s eye blinking.
Re: Awareness of awareness
Seeing awareness with eyes is impossible (don´t think you mean that). But the mind can "see" many things at once, also the state of awareness itself. So you can say there can be two awarenesses, lol. But the awareness of awareness will become subtler until there is only natural awareness without effort.rachmiel wrote:
That's why seeing awareness sounds impossible to me.
Re: Awareness of awareness
In the observer=observed way, ja. I learned this from Krishnamurti.LastLegend wrote:It's possible that you are the object yourself.
And that's my point: awareness of awareness just doesn't make sense, because awareness is not dualistic. If you have two awarenesses operating at the same time, one is not pure awareness; it's more of an instrument of thought/memory.Not awareness of awareness because there is still division and separation if you are still aware of your awareness.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Awareness of awareness
It's like using mind to search mind when isn't anything substantial there to search for.
It’s eye blinking.
Re: Awareness of awareness
Ja.
That's why, when I did some research on Dzogchen and found that its essential practice is to be aware of awareness ... I got confused.
Though I am a great friend of paradoxes and apparent impossibilities.
That's why, when I did some research on Dzogchen and found that its essential practice is to be aware of awareness ... I got confused.
Though I am a great friend of paradoxes and apparent impossibilities.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
- monktastic
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:48 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Awareness of awareness
Rachmiel, if the objects themselves are made out of the light of awareness, then awareness can illuminate itself in a way similar to how a candle illuminates itself.Reality—the “reality” that is evoked on every page of Longchenpa’s text—is the light of the mind that shines equally and inescapably in every moment of existence. Much of the difficulty of Dzogchen translation into English arises from the multiplicity of expression, the fine nuance of terminology, employed to evoke this fundamental luminosity. It is the single most important, unique assumption of Dzogchen that this light is self-existent and self-aware and in fact the sole ingredient of all our experience. This light is the great mystery of nondual mysticism. When we comprehend that Dzogchen is based upon the assumption that all and everything, consciousness and every form of experience, is naturally composed of this light, then we are able to read without let or hindrance the technical exposition of its revelation that allows the light to shine out in all its brilliance. The innate awareness of this pristine nondual brilliance is called rigpa.
There's no paradox here.
This undistracted state of ordinary mind
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
Re: Awareness of awareness
Hmm ... Aisi, the light creator of the candle, the flame, doesn't illuminate itself. It IS light, it does not receive light.monktastic wrote:Rachmiel, if the objects themselves are made out of the light of awareness, then awareness can illuminate itself in a way similar to how a candle illuminates itself.
Perhaps we're into semantics? I wouldn't be surprised, since this stuff is beyond words. What say you?
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
- monktastic
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:48 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Awareness of awareness
Yes, that's true. Saying that a candle illuminates itself is only a manner of speaking. If I said it to someone without vision, they may argue that light can only illuminate something else. But to someone with vision, the meaning is clear, even if logically imprecise. In truth, light never illuminates something "else." Light only ever "illuminates itself."
Perhaps it is the same with awareness.
Perhaps it is the same with awareness.
This undistracted state of ordinary mind
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
- dzogchungpa
- Posts: 6333
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Re: Awareness of awareness
Possibly of interest:
http://podcasts.sbinstitute.com/fall201 ... areness-1/
http://podcasts.sbinstitute.com/fall201 ... areness-1/
There is not only nothingness because there is always, and always can manifest. - Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
- monktastic
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:48 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Awareness of awareness
Yeah, Alan Wallace is great. He also goes to great pains to explain that his "awareness of awareness" practice is not (necessarily) rigpa (which he often terms "pristine awareness").
This undistracted state of ordinary mind
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17092
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Awareness of awareness
monktastic wrote:Yeah, Alan Wallace is great. He also goes to great pains to explain that his "awareness of awareness" practice is not (necessarily) rigpa (which he often terms "pristine awareness").
I've read a little about this and I don't get it. How are you supposed to know the difference between truly resting in rigpa, or resting in the alaya...do you just "know" somehow?
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: Awareness of awareness
have to check that out. also for textual there's Pointing out mind nature in the tradition of old sagesdzogchungpa wrote:Possibly of interest: http://podcasts.sbinstitute.com/fall201 ... areness-1/
I should be meditating.
- dzogchungpa
- Posts: 6333
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Re: Awareness of awareness
I think the notion of "timelessness" might be relevant.Johnny Dangerous wrote:I've read a little about this and I don't get it. How are you supposed to know the difference between truly resting in rigpa, or resting in the alaya...do you just "know" somehow?monktastic wrote:Yeah, Alan Wallace is great. He also goes to great pains to explain that his "awareness of awareness" practice is not (necessarily) rigpa (which he often terms "pristine awareness").
There is not only nothingness because there is always, and always can manifest. - Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17092
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Awareness of awareness
dzogchungpa wrote:I think the notion of "timelessness" might be relevant.Johnny Dangerous wrote:I've read a little about this and I don't get it. How are you supposed to know the difference between truly resting in rigpa, or resting in the alaya...do you just "know" somehow?monktastic wrote:Yeah, Alan Wallace is great. He also goes to great pains to explain that his "awareness of awareness" practice is not (necessarily) rigpa (which he often terms "pristine awareness").
How do you experience that though, by looking into abiding, ceasing, arising..and lack thereof..or so you just non conceptually "experience" something as timeless somehow?
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: Awareness of awareness
EDITJohnny Dangerous wrote:monktastic wrote:Yeah, Alan Wallace is great. He also goes to great pains to explain that his "awareness of awareness" practice is not (necessarily) rigpa (which he often terms "pristine awareness").
I've read a little about this and I don't get it. How are you supposed to know the difference between truly resting in rigpa, or resting in the alaya...do you just "know" somehow?
That's where the teacher comes in. Because now has me questioning some of my experiences. kun gzhi or gzhi? nyon-yid rnam-shes? lungmaten?
Last edited by lorem on Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I should be meditating.
- dzogchungpa
- Posts: 6333
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Re: Awareness of awareness
Well, I'm just a beginner, but it wouldn't involve "looking".Johnny Dangerous wrote:How do you experience that though, by looking into abiding, ceasing, arising..and lack thereof..or so you just non conceptually "experience" something as timeless somehow?dzogchungpa wrote:I think the notion of "timelessness" might be relevant.
There is not only nothingness because there is always, and always can manifest. - Thinley Norbu Rinpoche