Concordiadiscordi wrote: Perhaps it isn't possible to guage the value, singificance, purpose, or reach of tonglen.
- The supreme training of bodhicitta,
the bodhicitta of exchanging oneself with others,
is said said to the essence of the teachings.
Concordiadiscordi wrote: Perhaps it isn't possible to guage the value, singificance, purpose, or reach of tonglen.
In that case, it must be truly immeasurable!Malcolm wrote:Concordiadiscordi wrote: Perhaps it isn't possible to guage the value, singificance, purpose, or reach of tonglen.-- Sakya Pandita
- The supreme training of bodhicitta,
the bodhicitta of exchanging oneself with others,
is said said to the essence of the teachings.
That's good stew. But why overthink it? Why the detour through deterritorializations, the nomad war machine, the Body without Organs just to practice tonglen? The KISS rule has some value here: Keep It Straightforward, Sweetheart. Why make your practice life more complicated than it needs to be?Concordiadiscordi wrote:Just an afterthought: there is plenty of scientific evidence indicative of the subtle interfusion of awareness with reality. Such instances as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and quantum entanglement, both of which demonstrate the capacity of subjective awareness to influence objective states of affairs, are exemplary in this respect. The placebo effect is yet another fascinating example. Second-order cybernetics has also come to postulate the ultimate inseparability of the observer from that which is observed. Dr. Masaru Emoto has conducted extensive research on the capacity of emotion and intention to alter the physical structure of water molecules (I know that these studies are met with much skepticism, and I am not claiming that the hypotheses of Dr. Emoto are valid, but it is fascinating that such a thing is even conceivable). It is interesting that so many insights of this nature should emerge across so many disciplines and under so many guises, as they all gesture towards an elusive zone of indiscernibility wherein all things coalesce into a seamlessly interwoven tapestry of fluid inter-becomings, each of which affect and are affected by all others and none of which are ultimately separable from the inconceivably vast and complex web of relationality by virtue of which they are constituted. Indra’s net. To inhabit this zone is, as Deleuze and Guattari once wrote, to “be aware of existence and yet to know that one is no longer a definite being distinguished from other beings.” Who can finally draw a concrete line between self and world, subject and object, illusion and reality, the observer and the observed? Who can really say where practice begins or ends? Citing Deleuze and Guattari once more, it may be suggested that “at the limit, all that counts is the constantly shifting borderline." Yogācāra philosophy has long expounded the non-duality of subject and object. Hence, like all other things, it is entirely probable that one’s feelings are intimately tied to the entire fabric of reality. We may not be able to quantify, falsify, or reproduce this insight within the strictures imposed by empirical scientific materialism, but science is not the final measure of everything. Why should one assume that the bodhicitta of tonglen is in any way apart from the entirety of reality? Why should one assume that every infinitesimal particle of space isn't utterly imbued with the spirit of bodhicitta, or that this very spirit of bodhicitta isn't reaching deeply into the shared life of everyone and everything, gracing the entire cosmos accordingly? As Longchenpa once stated, "the fortunate person should faithfully recognize that whatever occurs is a floating, shimmering, mythic reality." One needn't lay claim to privileged insights or realizations in order to recognise the inseparability of ourselves from all else, or vice versa. Such verities are confirmed even by the empirical sciences, which are readily available to all and require no yogic training in order to be appreciated. One need only extend the subterranean intuitions of science to the nth degree in order to arrive at the sincere and faithful heart of Buddhist praxis, which includes the wonder and mystery of tonglen suffusing the whole of this floating, shimmering, mythic reality with the sacred spirit of bodhicitta.
Beyond questions of reality and unreality, we have all been afforded the opportunity of plunging deeply into this dreamlike ocean of boundless love and appreciation.
Hahaha, indeed. Just practice...Jikan wrote:That's good stew. But why overthink it? Why the detour through deterritorializations, the nomad war machine, the Body without Organs just to practice tonglen? The KISS rule has some value here: Keep It Straightforward, Sweetheart. Why make your practice life more complicated than it needs to be?Concordiadiscordi wrote:Just an afterthought: there is plenty of scientific evidence indicative of the subtle interfusion of awareness with reality. Such instances as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and quantum entanglement, both of which demonstrate the capacity of subjective awareness to influence objective states of affairs, are exemplary in this respect. The placebo effect is yet another fascinating example. Second-order cybernetics has also come to postulate the ultimate inseparability of the observer from that which is observed. Dr. Masaru Emoto has conducted extensive research on the capacity of emotion and intention to alter the physical structure of water molecules (I know that these studies are met with much skepticism, and I am not claiming that the hypotheses of Dr. Emoto are valid, but it is fascinating that such a thing is even conceivable). It is interesting that so many insights of this nature should emerge across so many disciplines and under so many guises, as they all gesture towards an elusive zone of indiscernibility wherein all things coalesce into a seamlessly interwoven tapestry of fluid inter-becomings, each of which affect and are affected by all others and none of which are ultimately separable from the inconceivably vast and complex web of relationality by virtue of which they are constituted. Indra’s net. To inhabit this zone is, as Deleuze and Guattari once wrote, to “be aware of existence and yet to know that one is no longer a definite being distinguished from other beings.” Who can finally draw a concrete line between self and world, subject and object, illusion and reality, the observer and the observed? Who can really say where practice begins or ends? Citing Deleuze and Guattari once more, it may be suggested that “at the limit, all that counts is the constantly shifting borderline." Yogācāra philosophy has long expounded the non-duality of subject and object. Hence, like all other things, it is entirely probable that one’s feelings are intimately tied to the entire fabric of reality. We may not be able to quantify, falsify, or reproduce this insight within the strictures imposed by empirical scientific materialism, but science is not the final measure of everything. Why should one assume that the bodhicitta of tonglen is in any way apart from the entirety of reality? Why should one assume that every infinitesimal particle of space isn't utterly imbued with the spirit of bodhicitta, or that this very spirit of bodhicitta isn't reaching deeply into the shared life of everyone and everything, gracing the entire cosmos accordingly? As Longchenpa once stated, "the fortunate person should faithfully recognize that whatever occurs is a floating, shimmering, mythic reality." One needn't lay claim to privileged insights or realizations in order to recognise the inseparability of ourselves from all else, or vice versa. Such verities are confirmed even by the empirical sciences, which are readily available to all and require no yogic training in order to be appreciated. One need only extend the subterranean intuitions of science to the nth degree in order to arrive at the sincere and faithful heart of Buddhist praxis, which includes the wonder and mystery of tonglen suffusing the whole of this floating, shimmering, mythic reality with the sacred spirit of bodhicitta.
Beyond questions of reality and unreality, we have all been afforded the opportunity of plunging deeply into this dreamlike ocean of boundless love and appreciation.