James Low & Simply Being

User avatar
gad rgyangs
Posts: 1142
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by gad rgyangs »

gad rgyangs wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
gad rgyangs wrote:
interesting passage u got page ##s please?
Vima Nyinthig, volume two, starts on page 222.
thanks M, but which edition?? some editions vima nyingthig is 3 vol, others 4...
bump: still looking for a useable reference that includes the edition, you know, like how references are given in an academic publication...
thanks in advance.
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.

"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

gad rgyangs wrote: bump: still looking for a useable reference that includes the edition, you know, like how references are given in an academic publication...
thanks in advance.
I am not an academic (thankfully), but here you go:

dri med 'od zer. "gsang ba bla med sgron ma dbu skor gyi gdams pa:." In snying thig ya bzhi. TBRC W12827. 4: 158 - 245. delhi: sherab gyaltsen lama, 1975. http://tbrc.org/link?RID=O01CT0042|O01C ... 812$W12827" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


N
MalaBeads
Posts: 803
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:47 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by MalaBeads »

It seems unfortunate that this thread has strayed so far from the OP which was about James Low and his teachings. Thanks so much to Astus for posting about him. I have been reading his talks and feel I have benefited greatly. Thanks again.
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.
User avatar
Paul
Posts: 1726
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Paul »

Here is a talk (in two parts) by James Low:

http://soundcloud.com/simplybeing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The transcript is here: http://www.simplybeing.co.uk/articles.p ... _teachings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I like it - he really is very good at explaining the Dzogchen view in a straightforward way.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
krodha
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by krodha »

Paul wrote:Here is a talk (in two parts) by James Low:

http://soundcloud.com/simplybeing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The transcript is here: http://www.simplybeing.co.uk/articles.p ... _teachings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I like it - he really is very good at explaining the Dzogchen view in a straightforward way.
It's really really basic though, and he still gives credence to dualities of self and other even though he's trying to show the emptiness of the subjective-self, he basically tries to convey that our own views of ourselves is based on external situations and interactions. He even said were pretty much energy going out and energy coming in, which is a wrong view and suggests coming and going and in and out and all sorts of dualities. If dzogchen is being applied correctly there are absolutely no dualities at all. I only read the transcript though so perhaps this isn't his best talk for all I know. It's akin to the tip of the iceberg in dzogchen though I'd say.

He spends an awful lot of time discussing the self to really be attempting to successfully convey the emptiness of the self. But it is important to do self-work(purification) in the beginning for some, I know I had to, in order to dispel some habitual tendencies. So to each their own.
User avatar
Paul
Posts: 1726
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Paul »

asunthatneversets wrote:If dzogchen is being applied correctly there are absolutely no dualities at all. I only read the transcript though so perhaps this isn't his best talk for all I know. It's akin to the tip of the iceberg in dzogchen though I'd say.
Personally, I think all those aspects of teaching are certainly in there, but he often seems to talk on multiple levels - something I've seen many teachers do.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Astus »

Indeed, it is his straightforward manner of teaching that grabbed me in the first place. It is difficult to find teachers who don't just repeat the common terminology all the time. Perhaps it is also an advantage that he can teach directly in his native tongue, thus breaking down those cultural and linguistic difficulties.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
krodha
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by krodha »

Astus wrote:Indeed, it is his straightforward manner of teaching that grabbed me in the first place. It is difficult to find teachers who don't just repeat the common terminology all the time. Perhaps it is also an advantage that he can teach directly in his native tongue, thus breaking down those cultural and linguistic difficulties.
Agreed, I think any nondual teaching can be a great supplement to ones understanding and some teachers are definitely more clear than others. There might be an aspect of Buddhist teachings whether dzogchen, mahamudra etc that could seem unclear that can all of a sudden click by hearing someone put it a different way. Using the teachings as a tool and being able to implement various tools for the job is key, in my eyes.

Other good teachers who helped me are
Tony Parsons
Jeff Foster
Adyashanti
Greg Goode
Scott Kiloby
Rupert Spira
Nisargadatta Maharaj
Ramana Maharshi
Ramesh Balsekar
Atmananda Krishna Menon

I took bits and pieces of everything they say and found the correlations within buddhism and dzogchen and the traditional texts and teachings and then came at it from the position of Buddhism and dzogchen in the sense of what does it say about what these other teachers are saying.. How does it critique their views.. Do they mesh... What works.. What doesn't work. And it's helped my view and experience tremendously.

It's wild, even so called "advaita" teachers like nisargadatta for example; his advice for practice is the exact same as the dzogchen method of being present at all times. He just uses different terms like "staying in the I AM" and he says forget Brahman and all that, it's useless.

It's interesting stuff.
User avatar
Sönam
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Sönam »

asunthatneversets wrote:... He just uses different terms like "staying in the I AM" ...
It does not sound very dzogchen ...

Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Malcolm »

Sönam wrote:
asunthatneversets wrote:... He just uses different terms like "staying in the I AM" ...
It does not sound very dzogchen ...

Sönam

Agreed. Not very dzogchen at all.
krodha
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by krodha »

Namdrol wrote:
Sönam wrote:
asunthatneversets wrote:... He just uses different terms like "staying in the I AM" ...
It does not sound very dzogchen ...

Sönam

Agreed. Not very dzogchen at all.
Perhaps not, I just mean the reference to remaining present. But you're right it isn't a dzogchen teaching but that's where I was saying take bits and pieces and see the correlations. Discard of the rest. Nevertheless I'm all for traditional dzogchen texts and teachings they hold their own undoubtably.
User avatar
Mr. G
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Spaceship Earth

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Mr. G »

Off Topic posts split: Jax's Dzogchen
  • How foolish you are,
    grasping the letter of the text and ignoring its intention!
    - Vasubandhu
User avatar
Dronma
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Dronma »

Mr. G wrote:Off Topic posts split: Jax's Dzogchen
Thank you! :thumbsup:
The sound of s i l e n c e.....
MalaBeads
Posts: 803
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:47 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by MalaBeads »

The most recent talk by James Low to be posted is from September, 2010, Milan, Italy. It is called "Emptiness of the Self"

Worth reading, IMHO.

You can find it on his website http://www.simplybeing.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.
MalaBeads
Posts: 803
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:47 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by MalaBeads »

I continue to appreciate the manner in which James Low presents the way dzogchen teachings function in ordinary life. Worth a listen.


http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F% ... 1Vbu4i2pQQ
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.
DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 9466
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by DGA »

I'm bumping this thread because I'm interested in a few different aspects of it. one of them concerns the content of the teaching as it has been transmitted. To what extent does Low's current teaching activity represent that of his esteemed teacher, CR Lama? If there are differences, of what kind or nature are they? (Certain posts in this thread suggest Mr Low has departed from tradition generally in his presentation of Dzogchen, hence my question.)

We know that Low was involved with many translation projects and has advocated particular kinds of sadhana practice (the chod practice linked below is one example)...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78295370/Chod-Practice

I should add that I read Low's book Being Right Here and I feel I learned from it. I'm asking out of interest and not hostile intent.
User avatar
Ivo
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:34 pm
Location: EU
Contact:

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Ivo »

Jikan wrote:
We know that Low was involved with many translation projects and has advocated particular kinds of sadhana practice (the chod practice linked below is one example)...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78295370/Chod-Practice
Hi Jikan. Just for your reference, the above is just the Chod practice from the Longchen Nyingthig cycle of Jigme lingpa, with some additional prayers connected to the monastery and lineage. It is one of the most popular Chod sadhanas currently practiced in the Nyingma tradition, if not the most popular. It is totally mainstream, just the translation is a little weird.
Schrödinger’s Yidam
Posts: 7885
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Schrödinger’s Yidam »

To what extent does Low's current teaching activity represent that of his esteemed teacher, CR Lama?
Forgive my ignorance and laziness as it is probably already in the thread somewhere, but who is "CR Lama"? And has Low been authorized to teach?

Personally I'd rather hear a realized master say the seed syllable "AH" than hear a non-realized aspirant give a lucid and articulate talk.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
User avatar
Ivo
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:34 pm
Location: EU
Contact:

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by Ivo »

smcj wrote: Forgive my ignorance and laziness as it is probably already in the thread somewhere, but who is "CR Lama"?
Chime Rigdzin Rinpoche, a terton and a very interesting and powerful teacher, who passed away about 10 years ago. He was totally legitimate, although his style was not to everyones' taste. He was a special one.
emaho
Posts: 917
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: James Low & Simply Being

Post by emaho »

smcj wrote:And has Low been authorized to teach?
Yes, Chhimed Rigdzin Rinpoche has authorized both him and Gudrun Knausenberger to teach and to give initiations, I've heard him say that about two dozen times and hundreds of others will be able to confirm that.
"I struggled with some demons, They were middle class and tame..." L. Cohen
Post Reply

Return to “Dzogchen”