Refuting nihilism
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:31 pm
Refuting nihilism
What reasoning is used to refute nihilism? What translated texts can I read to educate myself about this?
Re: Refuting nihilism
You might look into the Five (sometimes referred to as four) Great Madhyamaka Reasonings.
These reasonings and many more are employed in the 6th Chapter of Chandrakirti's Madhyamakvatara, as well as, other texts.
The topic is probably more accessible if you investigate modern commentaries that address these lines of reasoning
and then go from there.
Shaun
These reasonings and many more are employed in the 6th Chapter of Chandrakirti's Madhyamakvatara, as well as, other texts.
The topic is probably more accessible if you investigate modern commentaries that address these lines of reasoning
and then go from there.
Shaun
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:54 pm
Re: Refuting nihilism
Additionally, Gampopa's Jewel Ornament of Liberation has a chapter which deals with the two extremes of eternalism and nihilism. Chapter 17 is entitled Wisdom Awareness, and the specific refutation of nihilism is found in section 5 B, C & D.
Funnily enough, I am in the midst of that chapter now. Gampopa supports his writing with many examples from sutras and quotes. Here is one that I like for it's simplicity and directness:
Saraha says, "Grasping existence is like cattle. Grasping nonexistence is even more stupid."
I highly recommend this text. In my novice opinion, it encompasses the entire Mahayana path. Of course, for a complete breakdown and analysis of any single point there may be better sources. Like you, I need to gain deeper understanding of this point, and am looking for recommended reading. So, I thank the poster above and any future posts in this thread.
Funnily enough, I am in the midst of that chapter now. Gampopa supports his writing with many examples from sutras and quotes. Here is one that I like for it's simplicity and directness:
Saraha says, "Grasping existence is like cattle. Grasping nonexistence is even more stupid."
I highly recommend this text. In my novice opinion, it encompasses the entire Mahayana path. Of course, for a complete breakdown and analysis of any single point there may be better sources. Like you, I need to gain deeper understanding of this point, and am looking for recommended reading. So, I thank the poster above and any future posts in this thread.
Re: Refuting nihilism
Something I heard in an alan watts video.
If we assume a few things:
1. The only thing that really differentiates us from another being are our memories (basically)
2. When you die you lose your memories
3. New beings are being born all the time
Through practice, you can find a whole lot of things we aren't, once you do you'll realize that personal identity is just an illusion, and yet there is still existence. Thing's pop in and out of existence based on the presence of other things, causes and conditions, yet none of the things that come into existence, exist in their own right.
So you can't really say anything exists, yet thing's do exist, in an illusory manner.
It's impossible for me to put it into any words better than that, hope it helps.
If we assume a few things:
1. The only thing that really differentiates us from another being are our memories (basically)
2. When you die you lose your memories
3. New beings are being born all the time
Through practice, you can find a whole lot of things we aren't, once you do you'll realize that personal identity is just an illusion, and yet there is still existence. Thing's pop in and out of existence based on the presence of other things, causes and conditions, yet none of the things that come into existence, exist in their own right.
So you can't really say anything exists, yet thing's do exist, in an illusory manner.
It's impossible for me to put it into any words better than that, hope it helps.
Thus shall ye think of all this fleeting world:
A star at dawn, a bubble in a stream;
A flash of lightning in a summer cloud,
A flickering lamp, a phantom, and a dream.
Re: Refuting nihilism
Here is a translation of Mipham's mkhas 'jug:
http://www.lotsawahouse.org/tibetan-mas ... -arguments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Keep in mind all of this and my previous suggestions are an elaboration/explanation
based on Nagarjuna's root text (MMK)
Dzongsar Khyentse Rimpoche also has a useful commentary of Chandrakirti's Madhyamakavatara
that is easily found on the web.
There are many many resources too many to list. With a little digging and maybe the help of a qualified teacher you should be able to find resolution to your questions.
Shaun
http://www.lotsawahouse.org/tibetan-mas ... -arguments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Keep in mind all of this and my previous suggestions are an elaboration/explanation
based on Nagarjuna's root text (MMK)
Dzongsar Khyentse Rimpoche also has a useful commentary of Chandrakirti's Madhyamakavatara
that is easily found on the web.
There are many many resources too many to list. With a little digging and maybe the help of a qualified teacher you should be able to find resolution to your questions.
Shaun
Re: Refuting nihilism
If it is independent then it must truly exist.
If it is dependent then it cannot truly exist.
Both of the above extreme views of independent existence and nihilism are immature doctrines that do not consider dependent existence a possibility. Because of this disregard for other possible modes of existence, a wrong conclusion about reality is based on the observation that 1) things appear and 2) things appear only in dependence on supporting factors.
I can't remember any particular texts off the top of my head right now.
If it is dependent then it cannot truly exist.
Both of the above extreme views of independent existence and nihilism are immature doctrines that do not consider dependent existence a possibility. Because of this disregard for other possible modes of existence, a wrong conclusion about reality is based on the observation that 1) things appear and 2) things appear only in dependence on supporting factors.
I can't remember any particular texts off the top of my head right now.
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Refuting nihilism
If things are present now, what makes them stop to be present in the future? There is cause and effect.
It’s eye blinking.
Re: Refuting nihilism
Absolute nihilism cannot be refuted.Katharina108 wrote:What reasoning is used to refute nihilism?
The pure nihilist doesn't even acknowledge you, let alone accept the validity of your dialectical approach.
Re: Refuting nihilism
Try the following trick: the next time a nihilist tries to tell you nothing exists, pinch them really hard.
When they react to the pinch ask them: "If nothing exists, who is reacting to what?"
Used that one a Dharma brother that was mistakenly falling into nihilism, worked wonders!
When they react to the pinch ask them: "If nothing exists, who is reacting to what?"
Used that one a Dharma brother that was mistakenly falling into nihilism, worked wonders!
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
- Hieros Gamos
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 3:25 pm
Re: Refuting nihilism
"I do not know".Katharina108 wrote:What reasoning is used to refute nihilism?