Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
-
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:19 pm
- Location: Benelux, then USA, now Southern Europe.
Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?
I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.
I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
It's my understanding that the Nyingma separate mind, the nature of mind and rigpa. The nature of mind is emptiness whereas rigpa is emptiness, clarity and energy. From what I can tell this differentiation isn't made in in more informal teachings where the discussion is just about sem and rigpa.Clarence wrote:Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?
I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.Hayagriva wrote:It's my understanding that the Nyingma separate mind, the nature of mind and rigpa. The nature of mind is emptiness whereas rigpa is emptiness, clarity and energy. From what I can tell this differentiation isn't made in in more informal teachings where the discussion is just about sem and rigpa.Clarence wrote:Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?
I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
all this distinction is not really necessary.. Even the distinction between sem and rigpa is just a method, provisional at best. What we need is direct perception (ngon gsum)
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
heart wrote:Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.Hayagriva wrote:It's my understanding that the Nyingma separate mind, the nature of mind and rigpa. The nature of mind is emptiness whereas rigpa is emptiness, clarity and energy. From what I can tell this differentiation isn't made in in more informal teachings where the discussion is just about sem and rigpa.Clarence wrote:Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?
I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.
/magnus
This is more according to sems sde. Man ngag sde is a bit different.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
tamdrin wrote:all this distinction is not really necessary.. Even the distinction between sem and rigpa is just a method, provisional at best. What we need is direct perception (ngon gsum)
In Dzogchen, the differentiation between sems and rigpa is critical. Not just method.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Is rigpa a term that's even used much in semde? Seems that semde talks about chang chub sem.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Hayagriva wrote:Is rigpa a term that's even used much in semde? Seems that semde talks about chang chub sem.
No it is not used that much in primary sems sde texts, but is used more in commentaries on those texts.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Is rigpa = nibbana?
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Nosta wrote:Is rigpa = nibbana?
No.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
what about instant presence ?
Its a concept which i am not familiar with and about which CNNR talks a lot.
In the teachings i was given we were never told about things like this ,only about ways of looking at the mind and discovering the natural state-rigpa
Instant presence seems to me more like another gate to go trough before you get to rigpa.
But i was never taught this way.I was told more like look into "that" rest and "voila".I seemed more like a two step approach rather than an three step one as in CNNR approach where you are mindfull then you get into instant presence and from this into rigpa.
Am i missing something?
Its a concept which i am not familiar with and about which CNNR talks a lot.
In the teachings i was given we were never told about things like this ,only about ways of looking at the mind and discovering the natural state-rigpa
Instant presence seems to me more like another gate to go trough before you get to rigpa.
But i was never taught this way.I was told more like look into "that" rest and "voila".I seemed more like a two step approach rather than an three step one as in CNNR approach where you are mindfull then you get into instant presence and from this into rigpa.
Am i missing something?
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
It is not that different since also in Semde the differentiation between rigpa and sem is also of critical importance.Namdrol wrote:heart wrote:
Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.
/magnus
This is more according to sems sde. Man ngag sde is a bit different.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
"ngon gsum"? You mean "mngon gsum" http://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/mngon_sum" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ? I don't understand how that has anything to do with the distinction between rigpa and the nature of mind.tamdrin wrote:all this distinction is not really necessary.. Even the distinction between sem and rigpa is just a method, provisional at best. What we need is direct perception (ngon gsum)
The distinction between sem and rigpa is not an intellectual idea you know, it is something that becomes increasingly obvious through the direct introduction in Dzogchen. In Mahamudra this distinction is done in gradually on the path and in Dzogchen it is done in the beginning of the path. This is according to my master that teach both.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
-
- Posts: 1292
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:19 am
- Location: Southern Oregon
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
"Instant presence" is just a translation ChNNR often uses for "rigpa."alpha wrote:...seemed more like a two step approach rather than an three step one as in CNNR approach where you are mindfull then you get into instant presence and from this into rigpa.
Am i missing something?
Pema Rigdzin/Brian Pittman
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
heart wrote:It is not that different since also in Semde the differentiation between rigpa and sem is also of critical importance.Namdrol wrote:heart wrote:
Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.
/magnus
This is more according to sems sde. Man ngag sde is a bit different.
/magnus
Hi MAgnus:
We already had this discussion on e-sangha. Pointless to rehash it again. Believe whatever you like.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
But.... i thought we were recreating all the drama of E-sangha... I mean, where else am I gunna get my soaps?Namdrol wrote: Hi MAgnus:
We already had this discussion on e-sangha. Pointless to rehash it again. Believe whatever you like.
"Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise." --Surangama Sutra
Phenomenon, vast as space, dharmata is your base, arising and falling like ocean tide cycles, why do i cling to your illusion of unceasing changlessness?
Phenomenon, vast as space, dharmata is your base, arising and falling like ocean tide cycles, why do i cling to your illusion of unceasing changlessness?
-
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:19 pm
- Location: Benelux, then USA, now Southern Europe.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Well, maybe we can recreate the subject without the drama? I would be interesting to hear the difference between the two. I vaguely remember there was thread on it on E-sangha, but don't remember the content.
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Yes Namdrol, you and me have done that, not everyone present here at this time.Namdrol wrote: Hi MAgnus:
We already had this discussion on e-sangha. Pointless to rehash it again. Believe whatever you like.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
Well Clarence, it might seem like there would be a difference in Dzogchen since they push so hard on the separation of mind and rigpa. So some thinks that the "nature of mind" means the nature of confusion. But in the Dzogchen teachings (the Menagkde) one also say that mind (sem), our thoughts and emotions, is the expression of awareness (rigpa). So if you understand that statement you also understand why one could say that the nature of mind is synonymous with rigpa. However, in practical application Mahamudra practitioners don't separate mind and rigpa from the beginning, but rather let mind and rigpa separate naturally on the path, so from that point of view there could become some confusion saying that the "nature of mind" of a beginner practitioner of Mahamudra and rigpa are the same. But ultimately when you say "nature of mind" you are talking about the result of the practice, the Buddha nature. Ultimately all the Buddhas teachings are pointing to the Buddha nature for this reason they say the Buddhas teachings like a piece of sugar is sweet wherever you taste it. If you want to understand more about this I would suggest that you read Tsele Natsok Rangdrols "Heart of the matter" or if you got a copy his Dzogchen text "Circle of the Sun".Clarence wrote:Well, maybe we can recreate the subject without the drama? I would be interesting to hear the difference between the two. I vaguely remember there was thread on it on E-sangha, but don't remember the content.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
This is misleading.heart wrote:But in the Dzogchen teachings (the Menagkde) one also say that mind (sem), our thoughts and emotions, is the expression of awareness (rigpa).
In Upadesha, mind is variously said to be the mixture of the rtsal energy of vidyā and the karmic vāyus, the vāyu itself, and so on. Mind has a different location in the body than vidyā; different pathways than vidyā, and so on.
Whereas in sems de the nature of the mind is considered to be bodhicitta.
So this question really does depend on what Dzogchen teaching one is discussing it cannot be simplistically reduced to the statement "rigpa is the nature of the mind."
N