Re: Mahamudra in the Modern World
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 6:53 pm
Doesn't the Buddha promise happiness too?Malcolm wrote:A promise of happiness underlies all successful marketing.
A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
https://www.dharmawheel.net:443/
Doesn't the Buddha promise happiness too?Malcolm wrote:A promise of happiness underlies all successful marketing.
He does not make promises of that kind. But what he does say is that if you follow the Dharma, you can discover total freedom from suffering. If you want to call that happiness, ok. But it is more like describing absence of disease as health.dharmagoat wrote:Doesn't the Buddha promise happiness too?Malcolm wrote:A promise of happiness underlies all successful marketing.
dzogchungpa wrote:Well, I know this is a Mahayana board, but there's a whole section of the book of the twos in the Anguttara Nikaya about happiness or sukhaṃ in Pali. It might just be marketing though.
Well, somebody better let Bhikkhu Bodhi know, pronto.Crazywisdom wrote:Sukh means relaxed and at ease. No tension. Happiness is Piti. It's a sharp and transient state among the jhana.
Yep. Somebody should.dzogchungpa wrote:Well, somebody better let Bhikkhu Bodhi know, pronto.Crazywisdom wrote:Sukh means relaxed and at ease. No tension. Happiness is Piti. It's a sharp and transient state among the jhana.
I think for most people, a pleasurable state of relaxation and ease matches up with the word happiness pretty well.Crazywisdom wrote:Sukh means relaxed and at ease. No tension. Happiness is Piti. It's a sharp and transient state among the jhana.
Reginald A. Ray, in the Dharma Ocean Foundation Path Structure & Requirements writes:Simon E. wrote:The content of [Chogyam Trungpa's] Vajrayana teaching was completely traditional..he saw Shambala as a useful introduction for those not ready for commitment to Dharma.
The spiritual journey outlined by Trungpa Rinpoche included five stages of development. The first stage in fact precedes the official entry onto the Buddhist path; in Rinpoche’s presentation, it involved discovering and connecting with our basic human situation and becoming healthy, grounded, and decent people. He called this stage introducing the world to the basic Shambhala principles, and he believed that it can be presented to anyone, regardless of whether or not they ever become a Buddhist. The next three stages are traditionally called the three yanas: the Hinayana, focusing on the development of discipline and a sustained meditation practice; the Mahayana, focusing on awakening the compassion of the heart and the realization of the interconnection of all beings; and the Vajrayana, through uniquely powerful practices and methods, focusing on fully transforming the two veils of emotional upheavals and deeper unconscious obscurations that get between us and our true self. The fifth stage taught by Rinpoche (roughly corresponding to the fruition stage of Dzogchen) revisited the Shambhala teachings, but at a deep post-Vajrayana and post-Buddhist level. In this stage, the basic Shambhala principles—the fundamental openness of reality, the perfection of the unfolding of the universe, and the utter sacredness of our incarnation—become matters of direct and personal experience and an actual way of being in the world, rather than being mainly an intellectual understanding.
Are you implying that Ray might know more about CTR's teaching than our very own Simon E.?dharmagoat wrote:Reginald A. Ray, in the Dharma Ocean Foundation Path Structure & Requirements writes:Simon E. wrote:The content of [Chogyam Trungpa's] Vajrayana teaching was completely traditional..he saw Shambala as a useful introduction for those not ready for commitment to Dharma.The spiritual journey outlined by Trungpa Rinpoche included five stages of development. The first stage in fact precedes the official entry onto the Buddhist path; in Rinpoche’s presentation, it involved discovering and connecting with our basic human situation and becoming healthy, grounded, and decent people. He called this stage introducing the world to the basic Shambhala principles, and he believed that it can be presented to anyone, regardless of whether or not they ever become a Buddhist. The next three stages are traditionally called the three yanas: the Hinayana, focusing on the development of discipline and a sustained meditation practice; the Mahayana, focusing on awakening the compassion of the heart and the realization of the interconnection of all beings; and the Vajrayana, through uniquely powerful practices and methods, focusing on fully transforming the two veils of emotional upheavals and deeper unconscious obscurations that get between us and our true self. The fifth stage taught by Rinpoche (roughly corresponding to the fruition stage of Dzogchen) revisited the Shambhala teachings, but at a deep post-Vajrayana and post-Buddhist level. In this stage, the basic Shambhala principles—the fundamental openness of reality, the perfection of the unfolding of the universe, and the utter sacredness of our incarnation—become matters of direct and personal experience and an actual way of being in the world, rather than being mainly an intellectual understanding.
Heavens no!dzogchungpa wrote:Are you implying that Ray might know more about CTR's teaching than our very own Simon E.?
Thank you for this.dzogchungpa wrote:For an interesting example of some of CTR's completely traditional teachings, check out "The Highest Maha Ati Teachings: Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche in Great Britain" by RIgdzin Shikpo from the book "Recalling Chögyam Trungpa". It can be read online, for example here.
I have my reasons.Sherlock wrote:Why are you so enamoured with Chogyam Trungpa when you have no possibility of receiving teachings from him?
Milarepa is a well known example of a Vajrayāna tāntrika who was critical of institutional religion. In The Hundred Thousand Songs of Milarepa he includes monasteries among the "Six Deceptions":Wayfarer wrote:I had the idea that tantric practices generally were often transgressive of tradition - that was part of their rationale, whereas the Theravadin approach is conservative and traditionlist. They put a lot of emphasis on the letter, i.e. the word of the teaching, whereas the emphasis on guru devotion in tantric practice is due to the esoteric nature of transmission in those lineages.
and of course before Milarepa, Marpa and Naropa, there's Tilopa and Ganges Mahamudra.....dharmagoat wrote: Milarepa was a devoted disciple of his teacher Marpa and a faithful adherent of the Mahāmudrā tradition of his time.
Mind without projection is mahamudra.
Train and develop this and you will come to the deepest awakening.
Buddha is not most people. He is precise to distinguish a liberated state from a state of bondage with a shit eating grin..Bakmoon wrote:I think for most people, a pleasurable state of relaxation and ease matches up with the word happiness pretty well.Crazywisdom wrote:Sukh means relaxed and at ease. No tension. Happiness is Piti. It's a sharp and transient state among the jhana.
Can't wait to slap his ass around good.Sherlock wrote:Why are you so enamoured with Chogyam Trungpa when you have no possibility of receiving teachings from him? Did he authorize any of these students to teach Mahamudra or Dzogchen in their entirety?
Tony Duff is also a student of Trungpa and presents himself and Trungpa as very traditional BTW.