Maybe amongst Gelugpas.Ayu wrote:There are several Vajrayana teachers who wouldn't agree to a claim like this.Malcolm wrote:Yes, there is. It's called Vajrayāna.boda wrote:There's no "Buddhist paradigm" where alcohol doesn't negatively effect our nervous and endocrine systems.
5 precepts. Alcohol?
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
What about vajrayana use of heroin or crack cocaine?
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
There's a saying in the Vajrayana that entering the Path is like being a snake is a piece of bamboo. You can only go up or down. Down is still very much a possibility.narhwal90 wrote:What about vajrayana use of heroin or crack cocaine?
I see HHDL as a bodhisattva. And I've tried some of the nastier drugs. In my opinion, if you were to kidnap HHDL, tie him down, and force feed him some of those drugs he'd up an addicted madman like anyone else that gets hooked. In theory a true Nirmanakaya Buddha would not, since he is beyond all causes and conditions.
However that's just my idea about the whole thing, based somewhat on personal experience and reading some texts.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
What about Tai Situ Rinpoche who is Kagyü? "Renunciation in the Three Yanas" http://multimedia.getresponse.com/725/6 ... s/8770.pdfMalcolm wrote:Maybe amongst Gelugpas.Ayu wrote:There are several Vajrayana teachers who wouldn't agree to a claim like this.Malcolm wrote:
Yes, there is. It's called Vajrayāna.
He says, because he cannot keep the Vajrayana-renunciation for 100%, it is more save for himself to keep also the other ("lower") precepts. I think, he speaks for most of us.TSR on page 5 wrote:In this way then, we understand the definition of true tantra and true Vajrayana. In true Vajrayana there is only one thing that is crucial and that is samaya—based on samaya you have to function. You renounce everything for samaya; you keep samaya. In order to keep samaya, renounce everything. How much do we have to renounce? There is no number, we have to renounce everything. Everybody is a deity, everything is a mandala, every sound is mantra, every thought is wisdom, samadhi, and you have to keep this samaya. I can’t. For example, I like mineral water, but I can't drink from the Ganges today, but in pure tantric samaya we can do that. In my mind Buddha is up there, I am down here and other sentient beings are way below—there is somebody above me, somebody below me, and somebody at the same level. But in pure tantra you can't do that, all are the same. But unless you have truly reached that level, you can't comprehend it. Even if you try and pretend to comprehend it, I guarantee you, the first thing that will happen is that you will end up behind bars!
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Well, when you are in pain, you can use pain killers, there is little difference between this opioid and that, apart from potency or purity, the effect of all is the same.narhwal90 wrote:What about vajrayana use of heroin or crack cocaine?
And, of course, you can try anything once. I once smoked freebase (crack), in 1986. I didn't like the taste, and I don't like cocaine. I have done methamphetamine, heroin, morphine, etc. I don't recommend these things, but the hysteria around drugs and the war on drugs is really crazy.
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
With all due respect to Tai Situ, he has been a monk his whole life. He is not qualified to discuss the issue of alcohol. It is like Mipham writing a Tibetan Kama Sutra, it was all theory with no real practice. This is why Ganden Chöphel wrote one based on his experience of women.Ayu wrote:What about Tai Situ Rinpoche who is Kagyü? "Renunciation in the Three Yanas" http://multimedia.getresponse.com/725/6 ... s/8770.pdfMalcolm wrote:Maybe amongst Gelugpas.Ayu wrote: There are several Vajrayana teachers who wouldn't agree to a claim like this.
And further, Vajrayāna (for the 100th time) is not a path of renunciation, though one must develop weariness with respect to samsara to embark upon this path.
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Personally I like to make the distinction by saying that Vajrayana is not a path of eschewment. This clarifies any confusion the weariness of which you speak which is correctly called renunciation. Using the same word for both things is extremely misleading imo.And further, Vajrayāna (for the 100th time) is not a path of renunciation, though one must develop weariness with respect to samsara to embark upon this path.
If one has progress to the point where you can see all of life as potential opportunities for enlightenment then you can embrace everything as such. However that opportunity is not present if you still see life in terms of self-indulgence. The difference is actual renunciation (weariness) and the positive aspiration of bodhicitta.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
It is the same word in Tibetan and Sanskrit, therefore, it should be the same word in English. Weariness (revulsion, etc.) is a different word.smcj wrote:Personally I like to make the distinction by saying that Vajrayana is not a path of eschewment. This clarifies any confusion the weariness of which you speak which is correctly called renunciation. Using the same word for both things is extremely misleading imo.And further, Vajrayāna (for the 100th time) is not a path of renunciation, though one must develop weariness with respect to samsara to embark upon this path.
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
How about renunciation of kleshas?
May all beings be free from suffering and causes of suffering
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Is it the same concept when used in the two different contexts? Or is it possible to, as you have posted elsewhere, have the renunciation which is necessary to practice any Path at all, and yet not renounce any aspect of life that can potentially be utilized in walking said Path.It is the same word in Tibetan and Sanskrit, therefore, it should be the same word in English. Weariness (revulsion, etc.) is a different word.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
smcj wrote:Is it the same concept when used in the two different contexts?It is the same word in Tibetan and Sanskrit, therefore, it should be the same word in English. Weariness (revulsion, etc.) is a different word.
Yup.
In Sūtra, the path is based on giving up sense pleasures. In Vajrayāna, it is not.
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
My Gelug teacher was very specific in making it clear to me personally that in no form of Dharma are the defilements to be indulged in as defilements--including the Vajrayana. In the Vajrayana they are the raw material that is transformed into Wisdoms. Thus they do not remain on the level of defilements, which is what true renunciation is all about.Malcolm wrote:smcj wrote:Is it the same concept when used in the two different contexts?It is the same word in Tibetan and Sanskrit, therefore, it should be the same word in English. Weariness (revulsion, etc.) is a different word.
Yup.
In Sūtra, the path is based on giving up sense pleasures. In Vajrayāna, it is not.
I know you're not a Gelugpa, but that perspective is one legitimate way of looking at it. Plus it removes many many complications and confusions, especially amongst Westerners. YMMV.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
"Indulging in defilements" is not what "using the sense pleasures" on the path means.smcj wrote:My Gelug teacher was very specific in making it clear to me personally that in no form of Dharma are the defilements to be indulged...Malcolm wrote:smcj wrote: Is it the same concept when used in the two different contexts?
Yup.
In Sūtra, the path is based on giving up sense pleasures. In Vajrayāna, it is not.
For example, if you are a sūtra practitioner, it is ultimately considered ideal to give up sexual pleasure; in Vajrayāna, it is not, in fact, it is the opposite.
Vajrayāna is the path devised by the Buddhas for the era (this one) when afflictions are so strong they cannot be abandoned; and therefore, since they are the ultimate causes of suffering, they must be transformed using the special methods of Vajrayāna, because in fact, they cannot be abandoned.
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
My Vajrayana teachers are mostly monks. There are a couple of non-monks, but they are in the minority. And none of them downplay the role of Sutrayana as a foundation for Vajrayana. And none of them have suggested that drinking alcohol is a practice.For example, if you are a sūtra practitioner, it is ultimately considered ideal to give up sexual pleasure; in Vajrayāna, it is not, in fact, it is the opposite.
Oh, except I did know one Western lama/monk (not a teacher of mine) that was an alcoholic and used the Vajrayana as a rationalization for his drinking. His teachers were not pleased.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Sūtrayāna is not a foundation for Vajrayāna in terms of the path. Loppon Sonam Tsemo, one of the five founder masters of Sakya, writes (citations excluded) in his General Presentation of Tantra. First with regard to the Sūtra path, he says:smcj wrote:My Vajrayana teachers are mostly monks. There are a couple of non-monks, but they are in the minority. And none of them downplay the role of Sutrayana as a foundation for Vajrayana. And none of them have suggested that drinking alcohol is a practice.For example, if you are a sūtra practitioner, it is ultimately considered ideal to give up sexual pleasure; in Vajrayāna, it is not, in fact, it is the opposite.
Oh, except I did know one Western lama/monk (not a teacher of mine) that was an alcoholic and used the Vajrayana as a rationalization for his drinking. His teachers were not pleased.
- [T]he Pāramitāyāna practitioner makes that basis into a path by giving it up.
- First, the basis, as explained before, is the five desire objects. Those are the basis itself, but if it is the objects themselves, how are they to be given up? Since most people are totally fettered, how are [they] able to give up [the basis]? [The basis] is not to be given up.
Now then, if one asks “Won’t there be bondage because of objects?” Those without a method will be bound, i.e., like common beings. If one possesses a method, liberation is assisted by those [objects] themselves. For example, like poison or like fire. Therefore, objects do not intrinsically create bondage. Bondage is created by the deceived concepts depending on those [objects]. For that reason, since one is liberated because of having given up the intrinsic cause of bondage [i.e. deceived concepts,] the objects which [earlier] became the condition of that [bondage] [now] become the condition of liberation.
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Right, we use afflicted desire to get rid of afflicted desire, to become liberated from useless crap like cancer-causing estrogenic alcohol and everything else in the desire realm.Malcolm wrote:For that reason, since one is liberated because of having given up the intrinsic cause of bondage [i.e. deceived concepts,] the objects which [earlier] became the condition of that [bondage] [now] become the condition of liberation.[/i][/list]
That's the only time to use it. Otherwise we are proponents of emptiness who are have less renunciation than the proponents of essences that have developed the skill to correctly discriminated the unsatisfactory nature of desire realm objects, achieving form realm absorption
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Objects of the three realms are never the problem. Indeed, the three realms are pure.vinegar wrote:Right, we use afflicted desire to get rid of afflicted desire, to become liberated from useless crap like cancer-causing estrogenic alcohol and everything else in the desire realm.Malcolm wrote:For that reason, since one is liberated because of having given up the intrinsic cause of bondage [i.e. deceived concepts,] the objects which [earlier] became the condition of that [bondage] [now] become the condition of liberation.[/i][/list]
That's the only time to use it. Otherwise we are proponents of emptiness who are have less renunciation than the proponents of essences that have developed the skill to correctly discriminated the unsatisfactory nature of desire realm objects, achieving form realm absorption
And yes, proponents of essences often have more "renunciation" than proponents of emptiness. Why? Since they have no understanding of emptiness, they also have no understanding of purity.
Further, form realms absorptions just are not all that.
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
In other words, it's ok to drink alcohol when we don't have much preference between a cup of blood-covered shit and a cup of alcohol.Malcolm wrote:Objects of the three realms are never the problem. Indeed, the three realms are pure.
For everyone else, you possess the lowest kind of afflicted desire, desire for desire realm sense objects. Fortunately you can suppress this pitiful state with concentration, until purity comes knocking
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 2:54 am
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
Yeah, you could try that, or you can do what the Buddha is recorded as having asked his lay disciples to do, and just not drink strong intoxicants.
Better to just say, the precept is what it is, take it or leave it.
Advanced methods are specific for those that have learned them, and thus useless in a general conversation.
Better to just say, the precept is what it is, take it or leave it.
Advanced methods are specific for those that have learned them, and thus useless in a general conversation.
Relax! Smile From The Heart!
There is a difference between the Mundane and the Transcendental. If you purposefully confuse them, I will ignore you, you nihilist.
There is no Emotion, there is Peace. There is no Ignorance, there is Knowledge. There is no Passion, there is Serenity. There is no Death, there is the Force.
There is a difference between the Mundane and the Transcendental. If you purposefully confuse them, I will ignore you, you nihilist.
There is no Emotion, there is Peace. There is no Ignorance, there is Knowledge. There is no Passion, there is Serenity. There is no Death, there is the Force.
Re: 5 precepts. Alcohol?
If you honestly don't know what the big deal is with alcohol drive a taxi cab for a few night shifts and then come back to this topic.
The 5th precept is just that, a Buddhist precept, it's not law, take it or leave it. The choice is yours.
The 5th precept is just that, a Buddhist precept, it's not law, take it or leave it. The choice is yours.