Here's what is reputed to be an image of Tengri:

Samael Aun Weor wrote:The script of the First Root Race was written with the Runes. The mallet of Masonry comes from the arrow of the Egyptian God Ra, and this is a Rune. In that epoch, the rituals of the Polar Temple were all runic. The movements of the officials were runic. This is the divine script.
Let us remember that the Swastika is a Rune. The Hebrew letters are but modifications of runic letters.""The First Root Race was gigantic and black in color...."
"They are the Glacial Men, who, for the good of this poor suffering humanity, still exist."
"Individuals of such a group which correspond to the first race.... ...have preserved their original purity."
"Presently, the members of such a group, have a beautiful human size and presence similar to our own. They have perfect bodies of flesh and bone, and great wisdom. Indeed, they are the living prototype of what all of the populace of the Earth should be."
Although perhaps better said that the Mongolian Gobi is where the first white man of the Fifth Root Race or Aryan Root Race was born (it is said that the first 'white man' actually originated with the Second Root Race or Hyperborean Root Race).Manly P. Hall 33° wrote:"The Aryan race (of which both the modern Hindu and the Anglo-Saxon are sub-races) had its beginning somewhere in Central Asia. While Western anthropologists even admit this, they do not link this fact in any way with the Hindu belief that the race migrated from the Gobi desert, where the first white man was born."
About Mexico and Guatemala, many consider the Olmecs to be or have been associated with Merotic (as opposed to Nilotic) Africans.A Gnostic wrote:"Adi-Buddha is the primordial Buddha. It is the Buddha of the Buddha, the awakened of the awake. Adi-Buddha is a part of that ancient Vajrayana teaching known as Adi-Yoga, Union with the Primordial Absolute Principle (Adi-Buddha). Adi-Buddha has been symbolized as Samantabhadra-Samantabhadri. That is the equivalent to the Absolute in the highest form of Buddhism.
"Adi-Yoga is also known in some of the modern (meaning after Atlantis and the golden age of this root race) Tibetan traditions as Dzogchen and Mahamudra (the highest yoga tantra). 99% of the modern day practitioners in the physical planes who are receiving all sorts of recognition from religions and society are practicing a skeleton of the original Adi-Yoga. Therefore, without the explanations of the Avatar of Aquarius and conscious direct experience with the teachings, it is very difficult to truly understand Dzogchen, Mahamudra or the rest of modern day religious teachings wholistically. Initiatic Gnostic Kabbalah is true Atlantean Adi-Yoga (the teachings and practice of union with ADI). WITHOUT PRACTICE, THERE IS NO DIRECT UNDERSTANDING.
"Initiatic Gnostic Kabbalah was handed to Tibet by the Akaldan Society of ancient Atlantis. In Tibet, those teachings are still found under the name of Vajaryana, Adi-Yoga, etc. etc. If you study the lineages of Tibetan Buddhism, they will always say that the teachings go back to the GOLDEN ISLANDS.
"Even Atisha received teachings from the Golden Island and brought them back to Tibet. The Dzogchen lineage also says this, that the teachings came from the Golden Islands. The histories of these lineages also say that the sacred teachings can no longer be found in those islands (see the Karma of the islands of Sri Lanka, Indonesia etc).
"Obviously, those Atlantean Masters brought the teachings to Tibet over the seas. Indonesia and those Golden Islands were launch pads for the teachings from Atlantis (the Akaldan Society was located in what is now southern Mexico and Guatemala) to the first Aryan root race-Tibet."
I think you may have missed this related thread and the link to 'Yellow' shamansim in the Wiki article, which does indeed mix Buddhism and Shamanism, as opposed to the 'Black' shamans who have no Buddhist practices:catmoon wrote:K I did a quick look at the wiki article and this Tengriism seems to have very little to do with Buddhism. For starters it's theistic.
topic moved to the lounge.
Thanks.Martyn wrote:As far as I understand it "Tengerism" or "Tengriism" is the more modern and preferred way to refer to what is commonly known as "Shamanism." The latter term was coined by western anthropologists and is misleading because it sounds like it's the shamans who are being worshipped, which isn't the case - they have a role similar to priests in Christianity and it's actually the ancestors who are worshipped.
This is a good book on the subject:
Dreamtime and Inner Space: World of the Shaman
Hello Blue Garuda,Blue Garuda wrote:Thanks.Martyn wrote:As far as I understand it "Tengerism" or "Tengriism" is the more modern and preferred way to refer to what is commonly known as "Shamanism." The latter term was coined by western anthropologists and is misleading because it sounds like it's the shamans who are being worshipped, which isn't the case - they have a role similar to priests in Christianity and it's actually the ancestors who are worshipped.
This is a good book on the subject:
Dreamtime and Inner Space: World of the Shaman
I am really looking for specific text on Tengri(i)sm and the deity known as Tengri.
more plausible: Turkish & Mongolian are both Turkic languages, and hence would share cognates.Lhug-Pa wrote:Very interesting.
It could even be related somewhow to the fact that both Turkish Sufis and Mongolians use the title of Khan.
Mongolian is not a Turkic language, and no linguists makes that claim. Some still classify it in the contested Altaic language family, but the work of eminent linguists, including Juha Janhunen and András Róna-Tas, is leading many to conclude that there is no genetic relationship between the Mongolic and Turkic families. Lexical similarities can be accounted for by many layers of borrowings between the two languages. Róna-Tas's work with R-Turkic languages is fantastic for demonstrating this. The grammatical similarities are also increasingly being considered the result of long areal contact.Jikan wrote:more plausible: Turkish & Mongolian are both Turkic languages, and hence would share cognates.Lhug-Pa wrote:Very interesting.
It could even be related somewhow to the fact that both Turkish Sufis and Mongolians use the title of Khan.
Agreed.Jikan wrote:I think it's generally advisable to look for straightforward explanations for linguistic and cultural phenomena in everyday life and history, rather than in the (ahem) rather more obscure authorities cited elsewhere in this thread.
Hi. Looks fascinating. Thanks.AilurusFulgens wrote: Hello Blue Garuda,
I know that the following might not be exactly what you are looking for, but it may still provide some useful pointers in the right direction:
http://www.boandbon.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ailurus Fulgens
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests