Myers-Briggs personality test

Casual conversation between friends. Anything goes (almost).
User avatar
Kim O'Hara
Former staff member
Posts: 3319
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Kim O'Hara » Thu Dec 04, 2014 1:12 pm

Punya wrote:I have to admit to being quite attached to the I. I think of an introvert as drawing strength from being alone rather than being with other people. Not a bad quality for a meditator, I would have thought.

I agree, although I think it's healthier not to be too far from the mid-point of the scale between any of the pairs of opposites.

:juggling:
Kim

User avatar
treehuggingoctopus
Posts: 1181
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:26 pm
Location: Mudhole? Slimy? My home, this is.

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby treehuggingoctopus » Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:04 pm

Johnny Dangerous wrote:INFP

Some of the questions were hard to answer though, and I could have honestly gone either way.

Role = diplomat - LOL!!!


Same here. How do you feel about being lumped together with both Deanna Troy and Wesley Crusher?
. . . there they saw a rock! But it wasn't a rock . . .

Fruitzilla
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:44 am

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Fruitzilla » Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:22 pm

treehuggingoctopus wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote:INFP

Some of the questions were hard to answer though, and I could have honestly gone either way.

Role = diplomat - LOL!!!


Same here. How do you feel about being lumped together with both Deanna Troy and Wesley Crusher?


I was honestly a bit horrified when I read those names. And why oh why wasn't Edward Scissorhands there?!

User avatar
LastLegend
Posts: 2837
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby LastLegend » Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:41 pm

I got Britney Spear. Ooops I farted again.
NAMO AMITABHA
NAM MO A DI DA PHAT (VIETNAMESE)
NAMO AMITUOFO (CHINESE)

Bodhidharma [my translation]
―I come to the East to transmit this clear knowing mind without constructing any dharma―

User avatar
Paul
Posts: 1726
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Paul » Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:07 pm

Punya wrote:Not a bad quality for a meditator, I would have thought.


Pretty mandatory, I'd think.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell

User avatar
Qing Tian
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Qing Tian » Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:14 pm

INFP here too. Variant: Assertive, Diplomat.

I guess it's reasonably accurate inasmuch as that is kind of how I see myself anyway. And I was fairly confident in all my answers.
“Not till your thoughts cease all their branching here and there, not till you abandon all thoughts of seeking for something, not till your mind is motionless as wood or stone, will you be on the right road to the Gate.”

User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
Posts: 6504
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA
Contact:

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Johnny Dangerous » Fri Dec 05, 2014 2:09 am

I always found the I vs. E part to be confusing, or maybe too broad.

I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.
May the eyes of living beings be gladdened by skies made splendid by clouds
that lightnings garland, while on earth below, the peacocks dance with joy as
showers of rain, falling gently, approach.

-The Door Of Happiness

Punya
Posts: 1008
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:50 pm

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Punya » Fri Dec 05, 2014 5:19 am

I think it's about where you are on the continuum. Introverts can be cast as shrinking violets with no social skills but from what I've read previously about the Myer-Briggs test the I can be simply more about the need for and enjoyment of alone time. I know people who seem to be strongly Es in that they avoid time by themselves and endlessly seek out the company of others.

The results of a few of us seems to confirm that the changes can occur over time, which is what you would expect from a buddhist perspective. There was definitely a couple of questions that I would have answered differently in the past. I'd like to think this is a result of practice but it seems pretty likely getting older (in other words life experience) has something to do with it. :D
If we do not believe in what we cannot see, it does not mean that it does not exist.
~ Thinley Norbu Rinpoche

User avatar
Ayu
Global Moderator
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:25 am
Location: Europe

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Ayu » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:32 am

Johnny Dangerous wrote:...
I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.


Me the same. I enjoy being alone. But also I enjoy company to a certain extent. But I was put into the E-box.
It shows, all this "Who am I?" is as variable as clouds in the wind. :smile:
I have decided to stick with love.
Hate is too great a burden to bear.
- Martin Luther King, Jr. -

User avatar
Concordiadiscordi
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Concordiadiscordi » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:43 am

It would appear as though I am still classified as an INFJ.
"The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen."
- Tommy Smothers

User avatar
Ayu
Global Moderator
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:25 am
Location: Europe

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Ayu » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:53 am

There is a big community of INFP in here.
I have decided to stick with love.
Hate is too great a burden to bear.
- Martin Luther King, Jr. -

Fruitzilla
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:44 am

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Fruitzilla » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:33 am

Ayu wrote:There is a big community of INFP in here.


Indeed! And none of them seem to be quite alike. :smile:

Seriously though, Myers-Briggs is based on Jung's typology, and he says this about it:

One can never give a description of a type, no matter how complete, that would apply to more than one individual, despite the fact that it in some ways aptly characterizes thousands of others. Conformity is one side of a man, uniqueness is the other.

Fruitzilla
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:44 am

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Fruitzilla » Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:30 am

Johnny Dangerous wrote:I always found the I vs. E part to be confusing, or maybe too broad.

I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.


How about this definition for introversion as it applies to the Jungian/Myers-Briggs model?

The distinguishing feature of introversion, as opposed to extraversion, is that whereas the latter relates primarily to the object and data originating in the outside world, introversion finds it orientation in inner, personal factors.
Naturally, an introverted consciousness can be well aware of external conditions, but subjective determinants are decisive as the motivating forms. While the extravert responds to what comes to the subject from the object (outer reality), the introvert relates mainly to the impressions aroused by the object in the suject (inner reality).

User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 13243
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Grigoris » Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:51 am

Fruitzilla wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote:I always found the I vs. E part to be confusing, or maybe too broad.

I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.


How about this definition for introversion as it applies to the Jungian/Myers-Briggs model?

The distinguishing feature of introversion, as opposed to extraversion, is that whereas the latter relates primarily to the object and data originating in the outside world, introversion finds it orientation in inner, personal factors.
Naturally, an introverted consciousness can be well aware of external conditions, but subjective determinants are decisive as the motivating forms. While the extravert responds to what comes to the subject from the object (outer reality), the introvert relates mainly to the impressions aroused by the object in the suject (inner reality).
Which, of course, presumes that there is an objectively existing inner and outer.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

Fruitzilla
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:44 am

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Fruitzilla » Fri Dec 05, 2014 11:26 am

Sherab Dorje wrote:
Fruitzilla wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote:I always found the I vs. E part to be confusing, or maybe too broad.

I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.


How about this definition for introversion as it applies to the Jungian/Myers-Briggs model?

The distinguishing feature of introversion, as opposed to extraversion, is that whereas the latter relates primarily to the object and data originating in the outside world, introversion finds it orientation in inner, personal factors.
Naturally, an introverted consciousness can be well aware of external conditions, but subjective determinants are decisive as the motivating forms. While the extravert responds to what comes to the subject from the object (outer reality), the introvert relates mainly to the impressions aroused by the object in the suject (inner reality).
Which, of course, presumes that there is an objectively existing inner and outer.

Not necessarily. But that's a discussion which is off-topic here I think.

Punya
Posts: 1008
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:50 pm

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Punya » Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:24 pm

Johnny Dangerous wrote:I always found the I vs. E part to be confusing, or maybe too broad.

I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.


This responds in some way to your comment JD http://www.16personalities.com/articles ... ality-type" although I have some inevitable doubts about the assertion that a personality is "fixed".
If we do not believe in what we cannot see, it does not mean that it does not exist.
~ Thinley Norbu Rinpoche

User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 5:53 am
Location: California

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Mkoll » Fri Dec 05, 2014 11:38 pm

INTP. Turbulent Analyst.

:guns:
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa

User avatar
Lazy_eye
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:32 am
Location: Laurel, MD
Contact:

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby Lazy_eye » Sat Dec 06, 2014 3:27 pm

INFP, and pretty typical in that regard. I'm quite tickled to see this thread as it's a bit unusual to find so many IN__s in one location. This must be the "in" crowd (ha ha).

Rob

DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 8204
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby DGA » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:17 pm

Sherab Dorje wrote:
Fruitzilla wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote:I always found the I vs. E part to be confusing, or maybe too broad.

I'm an introvert in that I need recharge time, like some time alone every day etc...but I also feel like some degree of social interaction is needed, and I tend to get weird when I don't have it, and actually miss it.


How about this definition for introversion as it applies to the Jungian/Myers-Briggs model?

The distinguishing feature of introversion, as opposed to extraversion, is that whereas the latter relates primarily to the object and data originating in the outside world, introversion finds it orientation in inner, personal factors.
Naturally, an introverted consciousness can be well aware of external conditions, but subjective determinants are decisive as the motivating forms. While the extravert responds to what comes to the subject from the object (outer reality), the introvert relates mainly to the impressions aroused by the object in the suject (inner reality).
Which, of course, presumes that there is an objectively existing inner and outer.


Samsara involves experiencing things in terms of subject and object, inner and outer, the 8 worldly dharmas, and so on. This is a thread about different styles of experiencing samsara. I think Fruitzilla's post is interesting in that regard.

User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 5407
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Myers-Briggs personality test

Postby kirtu » Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:06 pm

INTP - but the result is boderline INTJ also.

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche


Return to “Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: smcj, Wayfarer and 7 guests