Hofstadter
Hofstadter
I bravely commenced my lecture on Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach. 791 pages ahead.
I have just by coincidence found that book 9 months ago, was looking for what buddhist philosophy and the concept of paradox have in common. Being aware that a good share of this forum's participants are wee older than I am, you may have experienced the hype about it when it was first published in 1979? I'd be curious to see how you perceived that book or what you remember of it.
I have just by coincidence found that book 9 months ago, was looking for what buddhist philosophy and the concept of paradox have in common. Being aware that a good share of this forum's participants are wee older than I am, you may have experienced the hype about it when it was first published in 1979? I'd be curious to see how you perceived that book or what you remember of it.
Ho! All the possible appearances and existences of samsara and nirvana have the same source, yet two paths and two results arise as the magical display of awareness and unawareness.
HO NANG SRI KHOR DAE THAMCHE KUN ZHI CHIG LAM NYI DRAE BU NYI RIG DANG MA RIG CHOM THRUL TE
HO NANG SRI KHOR DAE THAMCHE KUN ZHI CHIG LAM NYI DRAE BU NYI RIG DANG MA RIG CHOM THRUL TE
- Könchok Thrinley
- Former staff member
- Posts: 3275
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:18 am
- Location: He/Him from EU
Re: Hofstadter
Honestly, I kinda hoped this was going to be about The Big Bang Theory...weitsicht wrote: ↑Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:29 pm I bravely commenced my lecture on Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach. 791 pages ahead.
I have just by coincidence found that book 9 months ago, was looking for what buddhist philosophy and the concept of paradox have in common. Being aware that a good share of this forum's participants are wee older than I am, you may have experienced the hype about it when it was first published in 1979? I'd be curious to see how you perceived that book or what you remember of it.
“Observing samaya involves to remain inseparable from the union of wisdom and compassion at all times, to sustain mindfulness, and to put into practice the guru’s instructions”. Garchen Rinpoche
For those who do virtuous actions,
goodness is what comes to pass.
For those who do non-virtuous actions,
that becomes suffering indeed.
- Arya Sanghata Sutra
For those who do virtuous actions,
goodness is what comes to pass.
For those who do non-virtuous actions,
that becomes suffering indeed.
- Arya Sanghata Sutra
Re: Hofstadter
Wanna guess how Leonard got his name?
Ho! All the possible appearances and existences of samsara and nirvana have the same source, yet two paths and two results arise as the magical display of awareness and unawareness.
HO NANG SRI KHOR DAE THAMCHE KUN ZHI CHIG LAM NYI DRAE BU NYI RIG DANG MA RIG CHOM THRUL TE
HO NANG SRI KHOR DAE THAMCHE KUN ZHI CHIG LAM NYI DRAE BU NYI RIG DANG MA RIG CHOM THRUL TE
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: Hofstadter
I’ve always suspected that “interdependent origination” was better translated as “paradox”....was looking for what buddhist philosophy and the concept of paradox have in common.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: Hofstadter
I remember that book and remember finding it fun. Not sure how much it has to do with Buddhism. Lots of cool logical puzzles, patterns and self-references. Dennett's philosophy is rather dry though, from memory..
- Könchok Thrinley
- Former staff member
- Posts: 3275
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:18 am
- Location: He/Him from EU
Re: Hofstadter
Before this thread it would be a more interesting guess.
“Observing samaya involves to remain inseparable from the union of wisdom and compassion at all times, to sustain mindfulness, and to put into practice the guru’s instructions”. Garchen Rinpoche
For those who do virtuous actions,
goodness is what comes to pass.
For those who do non-virtuous actions,
that becomes suffering indeed.
- Arya Sanghata Sutra
For those who do virtuous actions,
goodness is what comes to pass.
For those who do non-virtuous actions,
that becomes suffering indeed.
- Arya Sanghata Sutra
- Kim O'Hara
- Former staff member
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 am
- Location: North Queensland, Australia
Re: Hofstadter
That's just about what I would have said.
As for "what buddhist philosophy and the concept of paradox have in common," all that I remember from this distance is that it helped shake us loose from our certainties, loosen our confidence in "the truth" and the power of logic. That's not a lot to get out of such a long book but if the book is fun anyway, then why not ...
Kim
Re: Hofstadter
I didn't read it in 1979 and have never read it completely. It is very basic computer science (speaking as a person with a computer science background) and it represents primarily the production rule branch of artificial intelligence not terribly well (and I also have a background in fielded production systems broadly for military intelligence support purposes).weitsicht wrote: ↑Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:29 pm I bravely commenced my lecture on Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach. 791 pages ahead.
I have just by coincidence found that book 9 months ago, was looking for what buddhist philosophy and the concept of paradox have in common. Being aware that a good share of this forum's participants are wee older than I am, you may have experienced the hype about it when it was first published in 1979? I'd be curious to see how you perceived that book or what you remember of it.
Kirt
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Re: Hofstadter
Well Kirt, I guess very basic computer science does not quite cover it. But if that is your memory, possibly that is under which focus your thinking was these days.
The book is about self-referentiality, braids, modulation of themes, recombination, possibly even how cognition works.
It also applies Koans, existing and new ones.
This is one of the more famous Escher drawings
The book is about self-referentiality, braids, modulation of themes, recombination, possibly even how cognition works.
It also applies Koans, existing and new ones.
This is one of the more famous Escher drawings
Ho! All the possible appearances and existences of samsara and nirvana have the same source, yet two paths and two results arise as the magical display of awareness and unawareness.
HO NANG SRI KHOR DAE THAMCHE KUN ZHI CHIG LAM NYI DRAE BU NYI RIG DANG MA RIG CHOM THRUL TE
HO NANG SRI KHOR DAE THAMCHE KUN ZHI CHIG LAM NYI DRAE BU NYI RIG DANG MA RIG CHOM THRUL TE
Re: Hofstadter
You really don't understand.weitsicht wrote: ↑Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:50 am Well Kirt, I guess very basic computer science does not quite cover it. But if that is your memory, possibly that is under which focus your thinking was these days.
The book is about self-referentiality, braids, modulation of themes, recombination, possibly even how cognition works.
It is not about "possibly even how cognition works" it is exactly a presentation of how cognition works and as I mentions is very basic computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence and all for a lay audience. And "self-referentiality, braids, modulation of themes, recombination" are essentially how Hofstadter is presenting the material (self-referentiality = recursion, recombination = genetic algorithms, what you are calling modulation of themes is a combination of production systems and abstraction and he is heavily focused on search as well).
He presents a very basic version of these themes for the layperson. Look for all the lisp code.
Kirt
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Re: Hofstadter
Agree on Dennett. Dry in the sense of being limited or feeling constricted.
Re: Hofstadter
I've had that book since the 1970's. I would like to like it, but Hofstader is, unfortunately, a scientific materialist. At the end of the day, we're kind of chemical entities that just happened to have been spat out by a physical process, and he's working out how it appears to be otherwise. That's what he has in common with Dennett. Such types claim to be 'humanists' but they're actually anti-humanist. (Don't start me.)
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi