In case you know the translation by Thurman: The Holy Teaching of Vimalkirti: A Mahayana ScriptureMalcolm wrote:Serenity509 wrote:There are several texts which suggest that, for a woman to become a Buddha, she must first be reborn as a man. However, the biographical sutras refer to several women who attained arhantship. What is the difference between a woman attaining Buddhahood and a woman attaining arhantship? Why one and not the other? I am confused.
Its just sexist bullshit in the sūtras, there is no need to pay it any serious mind. The remedy for this can be found in the Vimalakirtinirdesha sūtra.
Do you think its good?
Or:
Which translation do you recommend?