claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
It actually would be worth it if we could find an authority willing to write a message to the public editor.
http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/c ... ic-editor/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Kristof is notorious for publishing misinformation based on lazy use of bad sources.
http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/c ... ic-editor/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Kristof is notorious for publishing misinformation based on lazy use of bad sources.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Just spread very thin...Jikan wrote:If so, then Buddhist Studies is an anemic discipline indeed.Malcolm wrote:Jikan wrote:We're talking about an article in a book from 1996, right?
1996?
Surely this has been corrected in the scholarship already.
Nope.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Sorry Kirt, but no. Here is why -- I spent years correcting Dogyal advocates and so no — did I convince anyone of anything? No.kirtu wrote:
Yes it is. If the academics get something egregiously wrong it is in fact the job of translators and Dharma teachers to correct the issue. You could publish a paper in something like the Journal of Buddhist Ethics along with a few other translators/Western Dharma teachers. Or you could write an article concerning the misinterpretation and publish it in a magazine like Tricycle. But this kind of misinterpretation needs to be addressed.
Kirt
Further, in order to correct someone like the writer of the op-ed, I would have to explain too many details, many of which are bound by samaya (for exampe, how to explain to an outsider the ritual language of extreme violence found in so many protector petitions?).
And as far as correcting Sperling goes, that also is just a waste of time since he won't listen.
M
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
I don't think the point is particularly to change Nichols' or Sperling's mind, I think the point is to have a published correction in a reputable source that is accessible to everyone. Plenty of people would be persuaded by this.Malcolm wrote:Sorry Kirt, but no. Here is why -- I spent years correcting Dogyal advocates and so no — did I convince anyone of anything? No.kirtu wrote:
Yes it is. If the academics get something egregiously wrong it is in fact the job of translators and Dharma teachers to correct the issue. You could publish a paper in something like the Journal of Buddhist Ethics along with a few other translators/Western Dharma teachers. Or you could write an article concerning the misinterpretation and publish it in a magazine like Tricycle. But this kind of misinterpretation needs to be addressed.
Kirt
Further, in order to correct someone like the writer of the op-ed, I would have to explain too many details, many of which are bound by samaya (for exampe, how to explain to an outsider the ritual language of extreme violence found in so many protector petitions?).
And as far as correcting Sperling goes, that also is just a waste of time since he won't listen.
M
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
I am not a reputable source. You would need someone like Thurman for that.Greg wrote: I don't think the point is particularly to change Nichols' or Sperling's mind, I think the point is to have a published correction in a reputable source that is accessible to everyone. Plenty of people would be persuaded by this.
M
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Thurman has his own credibility problems, but yes an academic would probably be ideal. However, if the Times published your letter to the editor, that would be worthwhile.Malcolm wrote:I am not a reputable source. You would need someone like Thurman for that.Greg wrote: I don't think the point is particularly to change Nichols' or Sperling's mind, I think the point is to have a published correction in a reputable source that is accessible to everyone. Plenty of people would be persuaded by this.
M
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Greg wrote:Thurman has his own credibility problems, but yes an academic would probably be ideal. However, if the Times published your letter to the editor, that would be worthwhile.Malcolm wrote:I am not a reputable source. You would need someone like Thurman for that.Greg wrote: I don't think the point is particularly to change Nichols' or Sperling's mind, I think the point is to have a published correction in a reputable source that is accessible to everyone. Plenty of people would be persuaded by this.
M
Seriously, I am not the right person for the job.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
I'm sure His Holiness would just see it as a practice of a bodhisattva and do nothing. Maybe I will email his website or maybe someone like Thubten Jinpa could say this is not exactly correct, etc. etc.
I should be meditating.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Duh, can email someone at Maitripa and let them know also.
I should be meditating.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Okay will let some people know and see what they feel should be correct response.
I should be meditating.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Don't hold your breath!
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
lol,
I hope so
(Okay, the force was funny but too much energy--really need a Manjugosha emoticon!)
I hope so
(Okay, the force was funny but too much energy--really need a Manjugosha emoticon!)
I should be meditating.
- cloudburst
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
How would one explain this? People seem relieved that it is just a prayer to a protector, but the fifth Dalai Lama would have believed this to be a real entity who could be influenced by his prayers, just like a warlord. Given this, isn't it just as disturbing that this religious man is calling for children to be slaughtered? How can we understand his intention?Malcolm wrote: I would have to explain too many details, many of which are bound by samaya (for exampe, how to explain to an outsider the ritual language of extreme violence found in so many protector petitions?).
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
cloudburst wrote:How would one explain this? People seem relieved that it is just a prayer to a protector, but the fifth Dalai Lama would have believed this to be a real entity who could be influenced by his prayers, just like a warlord. Given this, isn't it just as disturbing that this religious man is calling for children to be slaughtered? How can we understand his intention?Malcolm wrote: I would have to explain too many details, many of which are bound by samaya (for exampe, how to explain to an outsider the ritual language of extreme violence found in so many protector petitions?).
No he is not calling for the slaughter of actual children, this is not his intention. All protector cycles have prayers with imagery just as violent. It is part and parcel of the rhetoric of violence that permeates the religious imagery of protector practices and smad las rites in general. I could cite (and won't) innumerable gore-filled examples where samaya breakers and their off-spring are subject to just as fierce imprecations.
Last edited by Malcolm on Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
With wisdom. I would start by reading the English translation and in this case you may have to explain parts of it in relation to the two truths, the demon of grasping at an inherent self, imagery and metaphor, etc.
Even though dates and events different--still disturbing. When the Karmapa had to flee I've read he and his attendant barely escaped with their lives. The soldiers were being...well soldiers.
Religion and politics I don't know how those two can be mixed. The sentient beings of this realm at the time did not have the merit (wording?) for a democratic type gov.
Explaining the protector aspect is more difficult.
I would pray to Manjugosha and Lokeshvara, contemplate, and then proceed.
Even though dates and events different--still disturbing. When the Karmapa had to flee I've read he and his attendant barely escaped with their lives. The soldiers were being...well soldiers.
Religion and politics I don't know how those two can be mixed. The sentient beings of this realm at the time did not have the merit (wording?) for a democratic type gov.
Explaining the protector aspect is more difficult.
I would pray to Manjugosha and Lokeshvara, contemplate, and then proceed.
I should be meditating.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
Because we have so many Khenpo-grade or near-Khenpo grade Western teachers and translators around.Malcolm wrote:Greg wrote:Thurman has his own credibility problems, but yes an academic would probably be ideal. However, if the Times published your letter to the editor, that would be worthwhile.Malcolm wrote:
I am not a reputable source. You would need someone like Thurman for that.
M
Seriously, I am not the right person for the job.
Oh, wait.... we don't. You can make the argument (in fact you did). Therefore you have elected yourself (in a way).
It would be best to approach someone like Thurman or one of a handful of other academics and author the response. However you will have to at least get it started.
As for samaya - review the Tricycle article regarding Kelsang Gyatso and the Demon Ghost from around 1998. I agree that this is a difficult subject. It would be less difficult in an academic paper because it can be treated from a religious studies perspective. You are a smart man. You can figure it out.
Kirt
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
I have other more pressing things to do, and I don't write academic papers.kirtu wrote: It would be less difficult in an academic paper because it can be treated from a religious studies perspective. You are a smart man. You can figure it out.
-
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:48 pm
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
lorem wrote:prob regarding the forced conversion of the Jonangpa monasteries to Gelukpa. I doubt the Great Fifth gave an order like that.
The past is the past, I only care about the present, that includes the Dali Lama, I only care about how the DL acts in the present.
Re: claim about Fifth Dalai Lama
I already contacted somebody who has a contact at Maitripa College. It will be passed along and then they have the resources to do something if necessary.
I should be meditating.