Buddha and Non-Dual Means

Forum for discussion of Tibetan Buddhism. Questions specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
sangyey
Posts: 455
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:00 am

Buddha and Non-Dual Means

Post by sangyey » Tue Jul 11, 2017 11:50 pm

Did Buddha teach non-dual means like that found in Tantra?

Thank you.

User avatar
Thomas Amundsen
Posts: 1875
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: Buddha and Non-Dual Means

Post by Thomas Amundsen » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:45 pm

Who do you think taught tantra?

User avatar
Vasana
Posts: 1745
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:22 am

Re: Buddha and Non-Dual Means

Post by Vasana » Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:39 am

It depends on your definition of 'means'.

The Buddha taught non-duality, but Tantra is distinguished for having a wider repertoire of means and methods available to realize the fruit.
'When alone, watch your mind. When with others, watch your speech'- Old Kadampa saying.

User avatar
sangyey
Posts: 455
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Buddha and Non-Dual Means

Post by sangyey » Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:13 am

Like Buddha taught having the conventional and ultimate aspect of reality in one act of cognition.

Or something like when King Ja received the Statue of Vajrapani he meditated on its form and emptiness appearance but that this was something that had already been taught by the Buddha.

User avatar
javier.espinoza.t
Posts: 926
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:29 am
Location: Chile

Re: Buddha and Non-Dual Means

Post by javier.espinoza.t » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:42 pm

all buddhadharma aims non-duality, even if we don't get the point
that's why it's called buddhadharma

to me there is no difference in the aim of sutras, tantras and dzogchen that is buddhahood, and that's noon dual
so the means may vary, according to the audience, that's all
what are you doing

Post Reply

Return to “Tibetan Buddhism”