Politics and/or total ignorance.Lukeinaz wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:19 pmSorry that was a bit confusing. Totally off topic. I was referring to Khyentse Wangchug not appearing in the lineage tree found in this book.
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche
Re: Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche
Re: Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche
The latter, most likely.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔
[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.
-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra
The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.
-- Samadhirāja Sūtra
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔
[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.
-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra
The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.
-- Samadhirāja Sūtra
Re: Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche
Isn’t he the one incorrectly listed as being born in 1910 about which they say no information is available?Lukeinaz wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:19 pmSorry that was a bit confusing. Totally off topic. I was referring to Khyentse Wangchug not appearing in the lineage tree found in this book.
(Not that it really matters - tulkuology is mostly nonsense anyway)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Fruitzilla, heart, javier.espinoza.t, Majestic-12 [Bot], Wsong0000 and 76 guests