Garab Dorje
- mechashivaz
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 9:50 pm
Garab Dorje
Do all schools of Tibetan Vajrayana view Garab Dorje as a Nirmanakaya? If not, who doesn't and why? Thanks!
Re: Garab Dorje
Anyone who accepts Dzogchen teachings does. Those who do not, don't.mechashivaz wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:20 pm Do all schools of Tibetan Vajrayana view Garab Dorje as a Nirmanakaya? If not, who doesn't and why? Thanks!
Re: Garab Dorje
Both the 3rd Karmapa and 5th Dalai Lama are known as being Dzogchen adepts. Does that mean that these schools accept Garab Dorje or is that more particular to individual Karmapas/Dalai Lamas/etc?Malcolm wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:19 pmAnyone who accepts Dzogchen teachings does. Those who do not, don't.mechashivaz wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:20 pm Do all schools of Tibetan Vajrayana view Garab Dorje as a Nirmanakaya? If not, who doesn't and why? Thanks!
“Whoever wants to find the wisdom beyond intellect without praying to his guru is like someone waiting for the sun to shine in a cave facing the north. He will never realize appearances and his mind to be one.”
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
Re: Garab Dorje
The third Karmapa and the Great Fifth would, can't speak for the rest of the Kagyus or Gelugpas, or Sakyapas for that matter.Seeker12 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:37 pmBoth the 3rd Karmapa and 5th Dalai Lama are known as being Dzogchen adepts. Does that mean that these schools accept Garab Dorje or is that more particular to individual Karmapas/Dalai Lamas/etc?Malcolm wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:19 pmAnyone who accepts Dzogchen teachings does. Those who do not, don't.mechashivaz wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:20 pm Do all schools of Tibetan Vajrayana view Garab Dorje as a Nirmanakaya? If not, who doesn't and why? Thanks!
Re: Garab Dorje
This is a tangential question, but I'm interested in your perspective if appropriate - it's sometimes said that various individuals are emanations of so-and-so. For example, I believe that it's said that the 2nd Karmapa Karma Pakshi was an emanation of Guru Rinpoche, and the 15th Karmapa was a terton which implies that he was a disciple of Guru Rinpoche when he was fully manifest in Tibet, etc.Malcolm wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:44 pmThe third Karmapa and the Great Fifth would, can't speak for the rest of the Kagyus or Gelugpas, or Sakyapas for that matter.
It's also said, then, that each subsequent Karmapa (for example) is basically the continuation of the mind-stream of the previous one.
So does that make all of the Karmapas emanations of Guru Rinpoche?
I can't think of distinct examples otherwise right now, but similar things would be like saying that such-and-such is an emanation of Ananda, or of Vimalamitra, etc, and then the subsequent incarnation of the Tulku line isn't necessarily discussed in the same way.
Can it be that in a particular Tulku line (assuming it's legit), one incarnation is an emanation of so-and-so and the next isn't?
Sorry if this isn't clear, or if it's not particularly relevant. Just came to mind.
“Whoever wants to find the wisdom beyond intellect without praying to his guru is like someone waiting for the sun to shine in a cave facing the north. He will never realize appearances and his mind to be one.”
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
Re: Garab Dorje
That's the idea.
Vimalamitra, in the Nyinthig literatures, promises to return to Tibet every one hundred years to correct deviations in Dzogchen teachings.I can't think of distinct examples otherwise right now, but similar things would be like saying that such-and-such is an emanation of Ananda, or of Vimalamitra, etc, and then the subsequent incarnation of the Tulku line isn't necessarily discussed in the same way.
The criteria by which Tibetans identify this one and that one as an emanation of this one or that one seem to be pretty opaque and lacking a real system. Since this system of recognitions is really not mentioned in any tantra, etc., I consider it culture, not Dharma, and pretty much ignore the entire tulku system as an anachronism that wont function well in the West, and will constantly present problems for Tibetans as much as it solves issues for them.Can it be that in a particular Tulku line (assuming it's legit), one incarnation is an emanation of so-and-so and the next isn't?
Re: Garab Dorje
The DLs are a line that plays a major role in the Gelugpa school but they traditionally have also been Dzogchen practitioners: however that is not a part of the orthodox Gelugpa curriculum. Some Gelugpas will also tell you that the DL is not the 'head' of the Gelugpa school, that would be the Ganden Tripa. The Kagyu curriculum (i.e. the set of teachings and practices transmitted by Milarepa and Gampopa) doesn't contain Dzogchen. But I would guess that a majority of high Kagyu masters have received and practiced Dzogchen teachings at some point. So as always - it's complicated.Seeker12 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:37 pmBoth the 3rd Karmapa and 5th Dalai Lama are known as being Dzogchen adepts. Does that mean that these schools accept Garab Dorje or is that more particular to individual Karmapas/Dalai Lamas/etc?Malcolm wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:19 pmAnyone who accepts Dzogchen teachings does. Those who do not, don't.mechashivaz wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:20 pm Do all schools of Tibetan Vajrayana view Garab Dorje as a Nirmanakaya? If not, who doesn't and why? Thanks!