Haven't really been into sports and football is really politicized these days. Whatever happened to baseball?Queequeg wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:59 pm Gentlemen, it has been a privilege playing with you tonight.
Politics and Toxicity
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Politicization of football is overblown. Trump makes a big deal about it because he has Trumpistas pegged to explode if any black man ever speaks up about anything. Those bozos want to boycott over the anthem protests? Not CTE?The Cicada wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:08 pmHaven't really been into sports and football is really politicized these days. Whatever happened to baseball?Queequeg wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:59 pm Gentlemen, it has been a privilege playing with you tonight.
Football right now is pretty compelling. Probably a high water mark. The CTE repercussions are coming.
Baseball doesn't have a salary cap. The Yankees can just buy pennants. That's what happened to it.
There is no suffering to be severed. Ignorance and klesas are indivisible from bodhi. There is no cause of suffering to be abandoned. Since extremes and the false are the Middle and genuine, there is no path to be practiced. Samsara is nirvana. No severance achieved. No suffering nor its cause. No path, no end. There is no transcendent realm; there is only the one true aspect. There is nothing separate from the true aspect.
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
Re: Politics and Toxicity
I can see how my comment taken in isolation would give that impression, and no small fault of my own for not being clear.
There is no suffering to be severed. Ignorance and klesas are indivisible from bodhi. There is no cause of suffering to be abandoned. Since extremes and the false are the Middle and genuine, there is no path to be practiced. Samsara is nirvana. No severance achieved. No suffering nor its cause. No path, no end. There is no transcendent realm; there is only the one true aspect. There is nothing separate from the true aspect.
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
Re: Politics and Toxicity
I suppose the Buddhist perspective is based is equanimity. I sit every day for at least a half-hour, and I believe it helps.justsomeguy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 12:40 pm I'm posting this because I want a Buddhist perspective. How do you all manage it? Something inside me tells me this is an opportunity for development, and I want it to be. But how?
I don't know if it aligns with the Buddhist perspective but after Trump was elected I sought to understand how that could happen and read relevant books and articles. Understanding the Trump supporter a bit better now aids in equanimity.
I read The Dictators Handbook (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dictator%27s_Handbook) to better understand Trump. Great book.
Re: Politics and Toxicity
boda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:41 pmI suppose the Buddhist perspective is based is equanimity. I sit every day for at least a half-hour, and I believe it helps.justsomeguy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 12:40 pm I'm posting this because I want a Buddhist perspective. How do you all manage it? Something inside me tells me this is an opportunity for development, and I want it to be. But how?
I don't know if it aligns with the Buddhist perspective but after Trump was elected I sought to understand how that could happen and read relevant books and articles. Understanding the Trump supporter a bit better now aids in equanimity.
That said, sometimes we can be just too damn tolerant. I see it in some students of mine who are good at seeing and understanding multiple perspectives. Then why speak up, why protest - it's all perfectly understandable and valid in some sense...
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Hello Dan74
Understandable and valid are two different things in my opinion. To understand is to avoid reducing reality into "right and wrong" without negating them.
The cleverest defenders of faith are its greatest enemies: for their subtleties engender doubt and stimulate the mind. -- Will Durant
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Indeed.
The issue I see is making sure we don't fall into a Hamlet-like apathy - no one can be really certain that theirs is the right view, let alone what consequences their actions are bound to have. And yet we still have to act. Non-action is also action.
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Whoa. There are plenty of views that are wrong. As Buddhists, we have a list of 64. Beyond that, we can safely judge that If a view is inflected with malice, or holds that people are inferior and therefore not entitled to fair treatment, that's a wrong view.
That tendency to know nothingism in the guise of fairness and objectivity is another form of stupidity. That is precisely a form of thinking that lulls one into not taking action when it is needed.
What action to take? - that is the question.
There is no suffering to be severed. Ignorance and klesas are indivisible from bodhi. There is no cause of suffering to be abandoned. Since extremes and the false are the Middle and genuine, there is no path to be practiced. Samsara is nirvana. No severance achieved. No suffering nor its cause. No path, no end. There is no transcendent realm; there is only the one true aspect. There is nothing separate from the true aspect.
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Maybe the Hamlet-like apathy is a result of the false dilemma "to be or not to be, that is the question" which is a result of self view according to my understanding.
To exist and to refuse to fall into cynicism is a heroic act in my opinion.
The cleverest defenders of faith are its greatest enemies: for their subtleties engender doubt and stimulate the mind. -- Will Durant
Re: Politics and Toxicity
You know I'd be the last person to accuse you of being overly tolerant.Dan74 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 7:37 amboda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:41 pmI suppose the Buddhist perspective is based is equanimity. I sit every day for at least a half-hour, and I believe it helps.justsomeguy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 12:40 pm I'm posting this because I want a Buddhist perspective. How do you all manage it? Something inside me tells me this is an opportunity for development, and I want it to be. But how?
I don't know if it aligns with the Buddhist perspective but after Trump was elected I sought to understand how that could happen and read relevant books and articles. Understanding the Trump supporter a bit better now aids in equanimity.
That said, sometimes we can be just too damn tolerant.
Understandable but not valid according to our own values and understanding. The point is, which I think is in line with topic, to circumvent the toxicity and in doing reduce partisanship and perhaps be more effective in mutually beneficial progress. Maybe progress is a bad word choice.I see it in some students of mine who are good at seeing and understanding multiple perspectives. Then why speak up, why protest - it's all perfectly understandable and valid in some sense...
Re: Politics and Toxicity
I guess I don't have the luxury of your certainty, QQ, but still I act, somehow. I am probably just vastly stupid, as you say, there are just so many variables and unknowns everywhere one turns. But yes, I agree, we should not allow ourselves to be paralysed into apathy. Non-action is something very different altogether...Queequeg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 pmWhoa. There are plenty of views that are wrong. As Buddhists, we have a list of 64. Beyond that, we can safely judge that If a view is inflected with malice, or holds that people are inferior and therefore not entitled to fair treatment, that's a wrong view.
That tendency to know nothingism in the guise of fairness and objectivity is another form of stupidity. That is precisely a form of thinking that lulls one into not taking action when it is needed.
What action to take? - that is the question.
Bundokji, I think Hamlet's dilemma was pretty serious and relevant for us. He saw the corruption everywhere he looked and didn't see the way out. What is one to do when every action one take is likely to only make matters worse?
Boda, 'tolerant' or 'not tolerant' is in the eye of the beholder, like everything else, I guess. FWIW, I second the . "The point is, which I think is in line with topic, to circumvent the toxicity and in doing reduce partisanship and perhaps be more effective in mutually beneficial progress." Yes, I think this is very important now. Build bridges. Be patient. It might take quite a while before anyone crosses from the 'other side."'
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Lol. Ok.Dan74 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:21 pm
I guess I don't have the luxury of your certainty, QQ, but still I act, somehow. I am probably just vastly stupid, as you say, there are just so many variables and unknowns everywhere one turns. But yes, I agree, we should not allow ourselves to be paralysed into apathy. Non-action is something very different altogether...
Don't exaggerate my point. Some things are certainly wrong. Nowhere did I preclude uncertainty.
And don't feign the lamb to stake some moral high geound. Passive aggression is still aggression.
I'm sure you'd be able to find some reasonable explanation for Jeffrey Dahmer's diet.
There is no suffering to be severed. Ignorance and klesas are indivisible from bodhi. There is no cause of suffering to be abandoned. Since extremes and the false are the Middle and genuine, there is no path to be practiced. Samsara is nirvana. No severance achieved. No suffering nor its cause. No path, no end. There is no transcendent realm; there is only the one true aspect. There is nothing separate from the true aspect.
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Ok.. it seems we talked past each other... no aggression was intended, passive or otherwise.. also no interest in fighting here or moral high ground.. i am sorry if that's how I came across..
Re: Politics and Toxicity
The problem arise when we try to have a categorical answer to apply to a fleeting phenomena. For example, when you say matters get worse, the focus is on a particular when, where and who (of which the three change all the time). Things might get worse in the short term but improve in the long term. Things might get worse in a certain location but improve in another, and things might get worse for one individual but improve for other individuals.
You might notice that the above is how the world act. Desire and identification are the driving force behind the when, where and who.
However, the Buddha's teachings, as i understand them, focused on:
1- The what: the first noble truth
2- The why: the second noble truth (the intention and which is, ironically, the focus on the three above Ws)
3- The how: the forth noble truth
It is worth noting that the above is "timeless". The Buddha's teachings are relevant to all individuals and groups regards of time and location.
The cleverest defenders of faith are its greatest enemies: for their subtleties engender doubt and stimulate the mind. -- Will Durant
-
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:32 am
Re: Politics and Toxicity
People food!They missed Dahmer.Queequeg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:38 pmLol. Ok.Dan74 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:21 pm
I guess I don't have the luxury of your certainty, QQ, but still I act, somehow. I am probably just vastly stupid, as you say, there are just so many variables and unknowns everywhere one turns. But yes, I agree, we should not allow ourselves to be paralysed into apathy. Non-action is something very different altogether...
Don't exaggerate my point. Some things are certainly wrong. Nowhere did I preclude uncertainty.
And don't feign the lamb to stake some moral high geound. Passive aggression is still aggression.
I'm sure you'd be able to find some reasonable explanation for Jeffrey Dahmer's diet.
https://people.com/food/
Re: Politics and Toxicity
I don't think I understood politics until I worked in it. The system is not broken. It is working quite well for those it serves. The key is that most humans are not rational animals. The game now is to understand the psychology of groups and give them a story that resonates with them. Much of this research was done by the gambling industry and could be called persuasion psychology which I had seen used extensively in the army. Its no mistake that Sheldon Adelson and Trump are so successful in politics. If you target swing ridings and use sketchy emotional arguments you can be a king maker in a very short period. It is very lucrative though the AI is getting pretty competitive in this space. I'm retired now. What passes for politics now is almost devoid of policy and generally makes you sick. The roughly 20% of rational moral people left are just screaming into the void and easily countered.
I'm of a mind that the only hope is to form intentional communities that break off from this madness.
I'm of a mind that the only hope is to form intentional communities that break off from this madness.
-
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:32 am
Re: Politics and Toxicity
This is why you are retiring into the woods or at least part of it anyway?Nemo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:01 pm I don't think I understood politics until I worked in it. The system is not broken. It is working quite well for those it serves. The key is that most humans are not rational animals. The game now is to understand the psychology of groups and give them a story that resonates with them. Much of this research was done by the gambling industry and could be called persuasion psychology which I had seen used extensively in the army. Its no mistake that Sheldon Adelson and Trump are so successful in politics. If you target swing ridings and use sketchy emotional arguments you can be a king maker in a very short period. It is very lucrative though the AI is getting pretty competitive in this space. I'm retired now. What passes for politics now is almost devoid of policy and generally makes you sick. The roughly 20% of rational moral people left are just screaming into the void and easily countered.
I'm of a mind that the only hope is to form intentional communities that break off from this madness.
Re: Politics and Toxicity
Looking back now I think it was making me sick. Agitating so many minds at once seemed to have fallout. Negative engagement works better than positive. I had no idea when I was recruited that individuals could still be effective in politics. But you have very limited choices. Elevating your interest group over another has little effect on policy. Those with real power have policy goals that involve the parties pretending to be in charge changing regularly. Imagine being highly paid for selling people on why cholera is better than syphilis. Policies are decided often years before elections behind closed doors. If you can't hold ridings hostage your demands are irrelevant. If you can they try and pay you off. Politics is like a rugby scrum. No one person is in control.amanitamusc wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:09 pmThis is why you are retiring into the woods or at least part of it anyway?Nemo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:01 pm I don't think I understood politics until I worked in it. The system is not broken. It is working quite well for those it serves. The key is that most humans are not rational animals. The game now is to understand the psychology of groups and give them a story that resonates with them. Much of this research was done by the gambling industry and could be called persuasion psychology which I had seen used extensively in the army. Its no mistake that Sheldon Adelson and Trump are so successful in politics. If you target swing ridings and use sketchy emotional arguments you can be a king maker in a very short period. It is very lucrative though the AI is getting pretty competitive in this space. I'm retired now. What passes for politics now is almost devoid of policy and generally makes you sick. The roughly 20% of rational moral people left are just screaming into the void and easily countered.
I'm of a mind that the only hope is to form intentional communities that break off from this madness.
So what passes for politics is theater now. Your votes have almost no meaningful effect on policy. It makes engagement very disheartening. The decision to paralyze the current system means things are getting worse. The tribalism that my party is always right and the other party is always wrong is designed to make governance impossible. Since 2016 I have seen illegal activity in all 3 of Canada's major parties. The money guys are always doing math and if a progressive party gets close to power they find 51% of them who are venal and no change comes. I couldn't find any winning moves which explains the timing of my offer. I'm still in shock at the number. Most people's lives are very stressful, lonely and precarious now. At best current politics offers cosmetic changes and feel good psychology tropes. The levers of power are beyond our grasp. They put me in the top 10% of earners and broke my heart at the same time.
I can sum up Western politics with the two words, "perfectly legal".
Re: Politics and Toxicity
This is all fine and good, but what would you have done in Hamlet's place with all this knowledge and wisdom?Bundokji wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 11:18 amThe problem arise when we try to have a categorical answer to apply to a fleeting phenomena. For example, when you say matters get worse, the focus is on a particular when, where and who (of which the three change all the time). Things might get worse in the short term but improve in the long term. Things might get worse in a certain location but improve in another, and things might get worse for one individual but improve for other individuals.
You might notice that the above is how the world act. Desire and identification are the driving force behind the when, where and who.
However, the Buddha's teachings, as i understand them, focused on:
1- The what: the first noble truth
2- The why: the second noble truth (the intention and which is, ironically, the focus on the three above Ws)
3- The how: the forth noble truth
It is worth noting that the above is "timeless". The Buddha's teachings are relevant to all individuals and groups regards of time and location.