Aung San Suu Kyi has denied there is ethnic cleansing of the Muslim minority in Myanmar.
I feel a bit disappointed with her regarding this, but I'm not sure exactly what the truth is.
What is the difference between war and ethnic cleansing ? It are only words.
I guess it is a state of war against intruders who like to have, as Bangladesh refugees, power and more in another country.
Heard they are responsible for attacks etc. like we know also in other countries (IS)
Then they would be supported by Al Qaida.
So the people in Myanmar are in a state of war with these Bangladesh refugees.
They form a state in a state and that is what the people not want from people who are "guests"
To have peace there, the state could give them that area where they live, but then there come more and more and more, and these people need also more land etc.
So it is up to a country to say yes or no to that refugee problem. Europe said yes to that and you can conclude for yourself if that caused a happy situation or an unhappy one.
In Thailand with the border of Malaysia there is a similar situation going on for many years including terrorism etc.
There they kill also muslims and vice versa , but here we say easy it are border problems and sometimes one is killed.
These muslims want more then is allowed and the local Buddhists also there do not want that. Guess it is a right of people to want or not something.
It seems to be that many muslims worldwide, immigrate to non muslim countries and then there are problems here and there.
These problems are caused mostly because of integration difficulties and cultural / religious difficulties.
Does not the matter how we see it, muslims and immigration causes direct and indirect problems, worldwide.
If non-muslims could do the same immigration strategy / politic as the muslims worldwide do, then i would say we have a balanced situation in these bi-lateral rights.
Like i go to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkey, Marokko etc. and built there a Buddhist Temple with monks, like the people can do easy and free in European countries.
But that is never the case, so i see only people coming out of a muslim country, going to a non muslim country and that do i see as expansion and that we call immigration (words)
Immigration is ok when i can go to Canada and have there my rights and a Canadian can come to Europe and have there also the same rights etc.
That is how it should be worldwide and as long as there is no balanced situation we get one sided development which does not solve the refuge problem.
Refuge problems like that from the muslims are not solved by immigration, they should do something in their countries and not export that problem to another country.
All in all i do not see genocide but call it war based on people who do not want something in their country.
Guess it is a right of a nation to defend and sometimes casualties are included that is logic.
But to say now genocide ? War is a better expression here, because we deal also here with terrorists and that is the most cruel form of war.