Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 26173
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

Post by Malcolm » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:23 pm

mutsuk wrote: Jim Valby knows and understands what he translates.
Yes, I agree.

M
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.


-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

User avatar
Dorje Shedrub
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

Post by Dorje Shedrub » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:25 pm

Thanks everyone for the informarion. When I first read this I knew it was the best book I had ever read.
DS

User avatar
dzogchungpa
Posts: 5761
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm

Re: Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

Post by dzogchungpa » Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:50 am

mutsuk wrote:I mean, her book displays nearly as many translation mistakes as Ann Klein's Unbounded Wholeness...
Tell us what you really think, mutsuk :smile:
Taking the attitude that the phenomenal world is sacred is the first and last practice of all. - Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche

mutsuk
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:35 pm

Re: Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

Post by mutsuk » Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:34 am

What I really think is that Jim Valby's work on the Kun-byed eclipses other translations published so far of the same root-text. It is clear Dargyay did not understand what she "translated". Her explanation about feminizing the King (rgyal po in Kun byed rgyal po) into a Queen is simply ridiculous. It is just as stupid as Janet Gyatso explaining that the natural state is beyond gender but is nevertheless feminine... Who lacks a brain ?

more urgent jest
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:11 pm

Re: Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

Post by more urgent jest » Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:23 pm

the bits that Keith Dowman translated, in Eye of the Storm or Original Perfection, are an interesting counterpoint.

http://keithdowman.net/books/vairotsana ... storm.html

tingdzin
Posts: 950
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:19 am

Re: Kunjed Gyalpo:The Supreme Source

Post by tingdzin » Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:52 am

mutsuk wrote:
Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:34 am
It is just as stupid as Janet Gyatso explaining that the natural state is beyond gender but is nevertheless feminine...
Did she really do this? Care to tell us where, exactly? Her Apparitions is one of the most useful books on Vajrayana interpretation I have read, possibly because she included so much stuff from teachers like Khyentse and Chatral Rinpoches.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: climb-up, meepits and 42 guests