The brain and Dzogchen...
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
I guess what I've been meaning to say here, is the brain is tsal.
That's about all we need to get.
Kevin
That's about all we need to get.
Kevin
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
dont give in to astonishment, go beyond.Virgo wrote:I guess what I've been meaning to say here, is the brain is tsal.
That's about all we need to get.
Kevin
feel.
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
This is not bardo, it is called tukdam. http://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Tukdam" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Acchantika wrote: Not sure, I can't remember the last time I died
When HHDL talks about the bardo and so on, he always infers that there is still brain activity going on after "clinical death", albeit subtle activity. E.g. (my bold):
~ HHDL
- " ...the body of another senior Tibetan lama...remained fresh for almost three weeks after he had died. As soon as I heard that this master's body was remaining in this naturally fresh state, I asked a medical center in Dharamasala, the village in northern India where I live, to carry out an investigation. This medical center had a simple machine for measuring brain activity. They sent a team with the machine and placed electrodes on the lama's head. Although a very detailed analysis of the results of these tests has yet to be completed, it seems that even a few days after he had been declared clinically dead, some very weak electrical signals could be detected in the lama's brain. This, I was told, is very unusual. We believe that these findings indicate that the lama's innermost subtle mind was still present and having a measurable influence on the body. "
So, perhaps the bardo experience is not something that happens apart from a brain.
The bardo happens to all sentient beings from they are dead until they for an other body. No brain necessary for that experience.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Thank you for elaborating.Heruka wrote:dont give in to astonishment, go beyond.Virgo wrote:I guess what I've been meaning to say here, is the brain is tsal.
That's about all we need to get.
Kevin
feel.
Kevin
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Right. This is why I have doubts that buddhas have brains in that enlightenment is beyond 'that which knows'. A buddha not as a human being but as an embodiment of the state beyond brain cognition. I appreciate your views on this subject.Acchantika wrote:The struggle of the brain trying to process itself ends with the realisation that it can't, because it is not the progenitor of "that which knows".
@Virgo There is no reifying of a state that can't be reified. The brain being tsal? Yes that would be one way of explaining it in that all we know about the brain is understood within the senses.
In Dzogchen, which is a complete path in itself, it seems crucial that one not just accept but really try to work through the issues. I mean if we look at the transmission of Dzogchen with Garab Dorje - the transmission was given by Vajrasattva to Garab Dorje who at a young age passed on this transmission to experienced scholars who all went on to realize rainbow body. Vajrasattva isn't a sentient being with a brain (this much is obvious). The transmission to Garab Dorje wasn't dependent on his brain since Garab Dorje was an infant and his brain hadn't developed fully in a conventional way (hence the doubts from his students). Then his students went on to replace their scholarly knowledge with an experience of the inconceivable.
In the bardo when child clear light and mother clear light meet one might wonder why hasn't mother clear light shown itself before. I would speculate that this is because the brain is a limiting factor in someway. So really and truly I think it is essential to take an appreciation of the inconceivable into practice because otherwise how could we truly relax or do GY in an authentic way? If GY is just brain-based then we have problems I think. In fact I think if we don't consider these issues then we won't get at the definitive meaning of Dzogchen - the 4 visions will just be created experiences and there are a few people who think they have already realized this because they have had an experience.
The Blessed One said:
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
You speak like if "the brain" can act and do things ... but the brain is a piece of hardware folks !Andrew108 wrote:This is interesting but seems to suggest the brain can cognize outside of it's immediate condition in the sense that it can know the state of all things through knowing the state of itself.Acchantika wrote:Within the nervous system of a sentient being such as a human, a mental process called "reflexivity" occurs, such that they can recognise their own state which is not seperate from the state of all things ("omniscience").
Then you state:So in this scenario it seems the brain can channel a state that is not internal to it but that exists objectively or independently. What would happen after death in this scenario?Acchantika wrote:Like a voltmeter is both powered by and can measure the current running through it, but is not the source of the current itself.
With an absence of brain would there still be cognition?
Personally I have a problem with traditional descriptions of the bardo - with it seeming that we have some phantom brain and perceive forms and so on. But in your scenario what would account for the bardo?
Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
How do we know? I don't know.Andrew108 wrote:Yes I know ChNN says that but that still doesn't stop me questioning.Sönam wrote:About, in his last teaching, ChNN said : "Mind is not in the head, but office of mind is in the head"
Sönam
How do we know that the non-dual experience is genuine even if kleshas diminish? The point here is that one is still making an effort to rest in non-duality which is brain-based. Isn't it the case that true enlightenment goes beyond the brain - in that buddhas don't have a brain. But then the sun doesn't have a brain, it's nature is luminous emptiness, it is pervaded by space. It doesn't see it's own light. How is a buddha different from both a human and the sun? I think this gets to the point I'm trying to make.muni wrote:Dual-nondual. If we can talk about a genuine experience it is a talk about.
The one making the effort to rest in non-dual brainbased?
I don't know. But maybe when I isn't, knowing reveals.
Imagined "I"-consciousness, my dear. then kleshas are free nature.
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
One crucial point here is that a reality that is not brain-based would be pervasive. It would have to be everywhere - like space. It would also have to be pure in that it is unborn - not created. The fact that it is not created by the brain is for me the most important point of all. It's the 'place' where ego can't stand to be.
The ego does really well in the brain - eeks out an existence and sometimes gets to play at being king for the day - or buddha for the day.
This reminds me of part of a song my teacher sang - ''let go and go where no-mind goes'....Let go into spaciousness - go as far as the brain can go - then leave it there. Then where are you? Where is ego? So the brain and it's cognitive scope only goes so far but nature of mind goes much further in that it collapses whatever view or experience we want to hold onto. I do hope that I can avoid brain-based, ego-based meditative experience. I don't want Dzogchen to be a creation of my brain.
This has been a very interesting discussion for me and very useful thanks.
The ego does really well in the brain - eeks out an existence and sometimes gets to play at being king for the day - or buddha for the day.
This reminds me of part of a song my teacher sang - ''let go and go where no-mind goes'....Let go into spaciousness - go as far as the brain can go - then leave it there. Then where are you? Where is ego? So the brain and it's cognitive scope only goes so far but nature of mind goes much further in that it collapses whatever view or experience we want to hold onto. I do hope that I can avoid brain-based, ego-based meditative experience. I don't want Dzogchen to be a creation of my brain.
This has been a very interesting discussion for me and very useful thanks.
The Blessed One said:
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
You are right, but perhaps there is still brain activity during bardo as there may be during tukdam. Why not?heart wrote:This is not bardo, it is called tukdam. http://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Tukdam" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Acchantika wrote: So, perhaps the bardo experience is not something that happens apart from a brain.
The bardo happens to all sentient beings from they are dead until they for an other body.
As above, the quote I posted may suggest otherwise. It doesn't really challenge that it happens, just how it happens.No brain necessary for that experience.
...
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
I do, and I am sure no-one thinks you are a jerk for stating what is ultimately the case.Virgo wrote:I can understand where you are coming from. I hope everyone also realizes that I am not accusing anyone in this thread of doing anything wrong by participating are thinking about these questions. As I said "I think this conversation can "potentially" lead to (to paraphrase myself). I am not saying that it does. I also don't want to appear like the jerk of the thread (my usual role). I guess what I'm really saying is this is the Dzogchen forum, I see no kind of place for this reification, maybe in the Tibetan Buddhist forum yes, but not here. I am probably just overreacting as usual anyway. But I think you got what I was saying, that is all that counts.
...
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Are you saying that you need a body to be able to reincarnate?Acchantika wrote:You are right, but perhaps there is still brain activity during bardo as there may be during tukdam. Why not?heart wrote:This is not bardo, it is called tukdam. http://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Tukdam" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Acchantika wrote: So, perhaps the bardo experience is not something that happens apart from a brain.
The bardo happens to all sentient beings from they are dead until they for an other body.
As above, the quote I posted may suggest otherwise. It doesn't really challenge that it happens, just how it happens.No brain necessary for that experience.
Anyway, the quote sure doesn't support what you suggest. In tukdam the mind is in the natural state, as soon as the meditation finish the person becomes an ordinary corpse. Only very advanced practitioners are in tukdam for a few hours or a few days or even longer. So it is a sign of realization, ordinary people just die.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
You need to incarnate at least once in order to re-incarnate.heart wrote: Are you saying that you need a body to be able to reincarnate?
The quote is suggesting that the experience of bardo and/or tukdam may not be independent of brain activity.Anyway, the quote sure doesn't support what you suggest.
The quote says: "Look, here is a corpse, which is clinically dead, which should be experiencing either tukdam or bardo around now. When we measure this corpse's brain, we find subtle electrical activity. Since this suggests a correlation between tukdam/bardo and brain activity, perhaps tukdam and/or bardo experiences involves brain activity".
...
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
No, it doesn't say that. You are jumping to conclusions. Tukdam is not a bardo experience it is a sign of realization. In the Tibetan tradition everyone assumes that a Lama that is in tukdam is still present, because of the stability of their meditation, even if the body is dead.Acchantika wrote:heart wrote:The quote is suggesting that the experience of bardo and/or tukdam may not be independent of brain activity.Anyway, the quote sure doesn't support what you suggest.
The quote says: "Look, here is a corpse, which is clinically dead, which should be experiencing either tukdam or bardo around now. When we measure this corpse's brain, we find subtle electrical activity. Since this suggests a correlation between tukdam/bardo and brain activity, perhaps tukdam and/or bardo experiences involves brain activity".
I am positive that a person that is dead and not in tukdam have no subtle electrical activity at all. You really think all western scientist would miss that?
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
I realise this. The quote suggests, at least, that the experience of tukdam may not be independent of brain activity. One can infer, by extension, that it is plausible that bardo experience may not be independent of brain activity, since the two are related albeit not equatable. Just as a possibility to consider, that's all.heart wrote: The quote is suggesting that the experience of bardo and/or tukdam may not be independent of brain activity.
No, it doesn't say that. You are jumping to conclusions. Tukdam is not a bardo experience it is a sign of realization.
I am not jumping to conclusions, as I said, "I don't know". This simply seems more plausible than talking about experience without a brain.
According to western(?) scientific theory, the brain organizes sensory information into a cohesive continuum we call "experience". In addition, we can't experience anything without memory, which is surely related to the brain. Everything we experience is actually a memory of what the senses registered a millisecond ago. So, it easy to say "experiences can happen without a medium i.e. a brain" but not so easy to say coherently. You are only "positive" of this because someone told you it was so, and someone told them it was so, and so on.I am positive that a person that is dead and not in tukdam have no subtle electrical activity at all. You really think all western scientist would miss that?
...
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Exactly, this is why Dzogchen should be/could be used as a tool to cut through these assumptions. It's extremely difficult to overcome attachment to the brain and the head BUT it is vital if one wants to progress in a genuine way. I've said before that I wouldn't want a brain-based dzogchen and if a person just follows blindly repeating doctrine then that's what they get. We don't have any limits in dzogchen so there is a real need to 'progress past thinking mind'. This is what I have learnt through this discussion and I am very grateful to have thrashed this out.Acchantika wrote:In addition, we can't experience anything without memory, which is surely related to the brain. Everything we experience is actually a memory of what the senses registered a millisecond ago. So, it easy to say "experiences can happen without a medium i.e. a brain" but not so easy to say coherently. You are only "positive" of this because someone told you it was so, and someone told them it was so, and so on.
The Blessed One said:
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Hi Andrew,Andrew108 wrote:Right. This is why I have doubts that buddhas have brains in that enlightenment is beyond 'that which knows'. A buddha not as a human being but as an embodiment of the state beyond brain cognition. I appreciate your views on this subject.Acchantika wrote:The struggle of the brain trying to process itself ends with the realisation that it can't, because it is not the progenitor of "that which knows".
@Virgo There is no reifying of a state that can't be reified. The brain being tsal? Yes that would be one way of explaining it in that all we know about the brain is understood within the senses.
In Dzogchen, which is a complete path in itself, it seems crucial that one not just accept but really try to work through the issues. I mean if we look at the transmission of Dzogchen with Garab Dorje - the transmission was given by Vajrasattva to Garab Dorje who at a young age passed on this transmission to experienced scholars who all went on to realize rainbow body. Vajrasattva isn't a sentient being with a brain (this much is obvious). The transmission to Garab Dorje wasn't dependent on his brain since Garab Dorje was an infant and his brain hadn't developed fully in a conventional way (hence the doubts from his students). Then his students went on to replace their scholarly knowledge with an experience of the inconceivable.
In the bardo when child clear light and mother clear light meet one might wonder why hasn't mother clear light shown itself before. I would speculate that this is because the brain is a limiting factor in someway. So really and truly I think it is essential to take an appreciation of the inconceivable into practice because otherwise how could we truly relax or do GY in an authentic way? If GY is just brain-based then we have problems I think. In fact I think if we don't consider these issues then we won't get at the definitive meaning of Dzogchen - the 4 visions will just be created experiences and there are a few people who think they have already realized this because they have had an experience.
Whether the brain functions normally, whether one is an Idiot-Savant, or whether one is brain dead, some fundamental things are still the same.
Kevin
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Dzogchen isn't brain-based anyway, though. Dzogchen = a primordial intelligence that is not conditioned and not a product of anything, such as the brain.Andrew108 wrote:Exactly, this is why Dzogchen should be/could be used as a tool to cut through these assumptions. It's extremely difficult to overcome attachment to the brain and the head BUT it is vital if one wants to progress in a genuine way. I've said before that I wouldn't want a brain-based dzogchen and if a person just follows blindly repeating doctrine then that's what they get.
...
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Acchantika wrote:I realise this. The quote suggests, at least, that the experience of tukdam may not be independent of brain activity. One can infer, by extension, that it is plausible that bardo experience may not be independent of brain activity, since the two are related albeit not equatable. Just as a possibility to consider, that's all.heart wrote: The quote is suggesting that the experience of bardo and/or tukdam may not be independent of brain activity.
No, it doesn't say that. You are jumping to conclusions. Tukdam is not a bardo experience it is a sign of realization.
I am not jumping to conclusions, as I said, "I don't know". This simply seems more plausible than talking about experience without a brain.
According to western(?) scientific theory, the brain organizes sensory information into a cohesive continuum we call "experience". In addition, we can't experience anything without memory, which is surely related to the brain. Everything we experience is actually a memory of what the senses registered a millisecond ago. So, it easy to say "experiences can happen without a medium i.e. a brain" but not so easy to say coherently. You are only "positive" of this because someone told you it was so, and someone told them it was so, and so on.I am positive that a person that is dead and not in tukdam have no subtle electrical activity at all. You really think all western scientist would miss that?
Face it, even if there "subtle electrical activity" (whatever that is) in the body for a master in tukdam the brain will not work if the heart don't beat. A person in tukdam is dead in any way we define it here in the west. You are actually inventing science that don't exist. You don't want to believe in reincarnation, that is fine with me, but there is no reason to beat around the bush about it.
/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
~Kurt Vonnegut
"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:04 am
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
Yeah, you are probably right.heart wrote: Face it, even if there "subtle electrical activity" (whatever that is) in the body for a master in tukdam the brain will not work if the heart don't beat. A person in tukdam is dead in any way we define it here in the west.
I said several times that these ideas are not opinions or beliefs of mine, just ideas I am playing with. A Buddhist that doesn't believe in reincarnation is like a Biologist that doesn't believe in life.You are actually inventing science that don't exist. You don't want to believe in reincarnation, that is fine with me, but there is no reason to beat around the bush about it.
Just keep in mind that if the Buddha hadn't earnestly challenged the notions presented to him, he'd still be a Hindu.
...
Re: The brain and Dzogchen...
always fixated on the mind, as if that is only the root to enlightenment.Virgo wrote:Thank you for elaborating.Heruka wrote:dont give in to astonishment, go beyond.Virgo wrote:I guess what I've been meaning to say here, is the brain is tsal.
That's about all we need to get.
Kevin
feel.
Kevin
arrogance blinds and ignores the body.
good day.