Two approaches.

User avatar
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: Two approaches.

Post by Dronma » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:16 pm

White Lotus wrote: 2. in this Dzogchen formum there is a rejection of the first approach, in favour of the second approach held by Namkhai Norbu's school and the lineage of Hui Neng, the 6th Patriarch of Zen (''See your nature and become a buddha!''). the second approach insists that one must see the true nature of mind or emptiness or energy. this second approach emphasises non duality. the second approach is also held by Therevada... to see dhamma nature.

so... we have these two approaches and should be aware that they cannot be reconciled.
the great question will always remain... is it already naturally complete? Or do we have to see it?
being or seeing. this is an argument between natural being and prajna seeing/wisdom.

This is a fake dichotomy!
What does "being" or "seeing" mean?
What does he mean when he talks about "natural being" or "prajna seeing"?
I'd like some clarification from White Lotus.
Sorry, this is all nonsense to me!
The sound of s i l e n c e.....

Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:54 pm

Re: Two approaches.

Post by Pero » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:16 pm

gad rgyangs wrote:you people are actually quite horrible. I try to ignore you as much as possible, but sometimes it genuinely astonishes me.
Takes one to know one. :rolling:
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 4695
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am

Re: Two approaches.

Post by rose » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:31 pm

As it appears nothing new is being said (except perhaps for personal attacks) this topic is locked.



Return to “Dzogchen”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests