Forrestyogi wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:42 am
Hey did you know this is just a continuation of cyberbullying?
No, we did not know that, because it isn't. Claims are made - we want confirmation. That's normal.
It's failing to do due diligence that let Sogyal Lakar get away with things for so long. Recognized as a third, late, tulku of Terton Sogyal? Rather unlikely in fact. Trained in his younger life in Buddhist traditions? Scarcely. Is it cyber-bullying to raise these points? I don't think so.
Not that I remotely want to suggest that Pema Khandro is anything like S Lakar. My gut feeling is that she is a far superior person, not that I would know.
I don't believe many people would find "marketing herself" inappropriate in the light of her web presence over the years. It's not that awful a claim, anyway.
The rest oi your long piece about cyberbullying is simply irrelevant, as there is no such thing going on here. Read the way questions are also asked about possibly fake male would-be gurus here, and you will see that she is not being given an unusually tough ride.
People are just asking for answers to clear and legitimate questions. If you are going to take the hump about that, it suggests that there may indeed be something (or an absence of something) to hide.