Date problems

Post Reply
Daniel Arraes
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:57 pm
Location: Brasil

Date problems

Post by Daniel Arraes » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:24 pm

How come some sources state Kamalashila lived between 713 and 763 c.e., whereas the Samye debate took place supposedly arround 794 c.e?
Is there any hypothesis like there being two kamalashilas?

Pero
Posts: 1911
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:54 pm

Re: Date problems

Post by Pero » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:25 pm

Well this topic isn't about what I thought it would be. :rolling:
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 24948
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Date problems

Post by Malcolm » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:32 pm

Daniel Arraes wrote:How come some sources state Kamalashila lived between 713 and 763 c.e., whereas the Samye debate took place supposedly arround 794 c.e?
Is there any hypothesis like there being two kamalashilas?

Tibetans were very fuzzy about dates, and imperial dates used to be considered 60 years earlier than we think of them now.
Atikosha
Tibetan Medicine Blog
Sudarsana Mandala, Tibetan Medicine and Herbs
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


Relax, don’t worry about all the problems of samsara. Everything is relative. But try to be present.


— Chogyal Namkhai Norbu

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Date problems

Post by catmoon » Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:37 am

Pero wrote:Well this topic isn't about what I thought it would be. :rolling:
Likewise I'm sure!
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests