Surprises in Buddhism?

User avatar
dharmapdx
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:54 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by dharmapdx » Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:50 am

That whole “pain is just an illusion” and “you don’t really exist” talk also goes on among students of “A Course in Miracles.” As I posted above, I was very close to Dr. Kenneth Wapnick, one of the most well-respected teachers of “a course in miracles.” He has many students all over the world. Common sense would seem to dictate that in mourning the loss of Ken Wapnick, I would be able to turn to his students for compassion and reassurance. To be fair, some were indeed compassionate…. But I remember one of his students asking me, “Who is the one who is doing the mourning?” Which was her way of telling me that I don’t exist. LOL. I got a lot of those weird statements from his students.

And that brings me to what has been a positive surprise for me about Nichiren Buddhism: how pragmatic and down-to-earth it is. From what I’ve seen so far, Nichiren Buddhists don’t get that hung up on metaphysics.


Ogyen wrote:
Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:13 am
I've had a few shockers ... I do understand people are people whenever you go and that 90% mean well albeit ignorance has a way of deviating the course of action to unskillfulness, bigotry, and prejudice.

Major shocker #1: the amount of abuse that happens in monasteries from rape to abusive treatment in the stronger to weaker... Saddening.

Major shocker #2: sexism is the same (rampant) as it is everywhere else.

Major shocker #3: institutionalized Buddhism is the same as any other religion with all its drawbacks, human politics, and sects.

Major shocker #4: how online Buddhists treat each other. Many are just as self-righteous and even less compassionate than Christians (hey at least they preach God is love, mean buddhists tell people their pain is an illusion, and that they don't really exist... :jawdrop: ).. I had a major brain freeze trying to understand this... It was truly shocking. (I'm not referring to DW)

Major shocker #5: how many practitioners in their own traditions lack respect for other traditions that differ from THEIR Dharma... Like Theravadans who say Sutra is basically some scholars opinions, or mahayanists who think the only authority is shakyamuni and that every other Buddha is an invention, or that termas are dreams and delusions, and all those types of situations...

The list goes on...

:meditate:

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 5457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by Queequeg » Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:51 pm

dharmapdx wrote:
Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:50 am
And that brings me to what has been a positive surprise for me about Nichiren Buddhism: how pragmatic and down-to-earth it is. From what I’ve seen so far, Nichiren Buddhists don’t get that hung up on metaphysics.
Thank Zhiyi for that. His teachings cut like a Diamond Scalpel.
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

User avatar
dharmapdx
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:54 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by dharmapdx » Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:32 pm

If I may resurrect this … I suppose one thing I was trying to say was: before I started attending a temple before I started chanting, I had a perception that Buddhism was about “peace.” I suppose therefore I thought that any Buddhist institution, and any Buddhist people, I encountered would be “peaceful.” It was a surprise to me to become involved with various institutions and rather than finding peaceful people, find a lot of fighting.

Maybe what I’m getting around to saying is … it was a surprise to me to find that when you get down to it, buddhism is just like any other religion. Or, “people are people” as they say.

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 5457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by Queequeg » Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:30 pm

dharmapdx wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:32 pm
buddhism is just like any other religion. Or, “people are people” as they say.
I disagree with the former statement. The latter seems about right.
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 5457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by Queequeg » Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:42 am

split question about how Buddhism is different than was there religions.
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

smcj
Posts: 5626
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by smcj » Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:36 am

Buddhism is for people that have defiled minds. If you're enlightened you don't need it anymore. That's in the texts.
I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against Lama abuse.

User avatar
Ogyen
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by Ogyen » Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:53 pm

Queequeg wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:30 pm
dharmapdx wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:32 pm
buddhism is just like any other religion. Or, “people are people” as they say.
I disagree with the former statement. The latter seems about right.
I agree with the former statement because institutional Buddhism IS like any other religion with a need to support itself, its vinaya with resources and with a code of conduct for its sangha, that is also btw, based in the same fallacies the rest of the world's religions operate. The people created Buddhism, the Buddha simply mastered dharma.

Dharma on the other hand is beyond institution. And as such is not a religion.
Image Made from 100% recycled karma

The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum

"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy

User avatar
Minobu
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by Minobu » Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:42 pm

smcj wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:36 am
Buddhism is for people that have defiled minds. If you're enlightened you don't need it anymore. That's in the texts.
And yet buddhism is for others as well...
So once all cleaned up and enlightened one still does for others...so is it really over?

User avatar
Ogyen
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by Ogyen » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:03 am

Minobu wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:42 pm
So once all cleaned up and enlightened one still does for others...so is it really over?
It's definitely over for your delusion. Ignorance may continue for a few bhumis.
Image Made from 100% recycled karma

The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum

"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy

illarraza
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:30 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by illarraza » Sat Jun 16, 2018 9:22 pm

dharmapdx wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:31 pm
Thanks for the responses, everyone. This has all given me a lot to think about….

With regard to the social hierarchy in Buddhist organizations, I suppose the deeper issue for me is I suppose I don't understand why Buddhist organizations are even necessary to begin with. Which kind of brings me to the New Age issue I referred to above. Most New Age activities are do-it-yourself, and I suppose I had expected Buddhism to be the same. I can understand for example why a publishing house may be necessary to publish books about Buddhist philosophy. But I guess I had considered that the closest one would need to come to being involved with a Buddhist organization would be to read the books published by the publisher. The publisher being "the Buddhist organization" itself.

I suppose I just need to get it out of my head that Buddhism is a do-it-yourself philosophy. I suppose one reason I have come to believe that it was DIY, is because for the Buddha … it basically WAS. He found his enlightenment while alone in the forest.

With regard to social hierarchy, I wish that having social hierarchy would ensure that the people at the top were humane. But what I have seen -- and this includes Buddhist organizations -- is people who want social status simply for the sake of social status, and then they become tyrants. Buddhism is simply a means to an end for them, the end being social status. For someone who has no interest in social status -- for an anarchist -- this is just entirely unappealing.

Not just unappealing. In my opinion this emphasis on social hierarchy is also superficial.
You are correct. Buddhists organizations are not necessary.

dude
Posts: 610
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:38 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by dude » Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:54 pm

And yet buddhism is for others as well...
So once all cleaned up and enlightened one still does for others...so is it really over?

It's up to you.

User avatar
dharmapdx
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:54 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by dharmapdx » Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:29 pm

Was recently reminded of another surprise in Buddhism…. This Buddhism (Nichiren Buddhism) doesn’t feel like “Buddhism” at all. Before people feel insulted, hear me out….

I was introduced to Buddhism in the late 1990s by way of Americanized “pop culture” Tibetan Buddhism and Thich Nhat Hanh, with this emphasis on the Four Noble Truths. I don’t know about you, but that first “truth” is highly unattractive to me: “All life is suffering.” I appreciated the peacefulness in the Buddhism I was introduced to, and was fascinated by the Dalai Lama’s story. But what a miserable philosophy…. Who on earth would want to practice that? (Note: I was actually introduced to THE FIGURE of Buddha when I was a child visiting Japan. I was fascinated by the figure of Buddha, but no one was about to explain Buddhist philosophy to a 7-year-old American boy.)

As a practicing Nichiren Buddhist, I am often dumbfounded by how unlike this Buddhism is from my initial introduction to Buddhism via that grim First Noble Truth. To be honest, I can see why some would say Nichiren Buddhism (particularly SGI, which I now practice) isn’t even Buddhism at all. And that’s fine with me. Whatever this is, it works for me.

Note: I recall a discussion earlier where Q wrote that the Four Noble Truths are subsumed into NMRK and thus become more or less irrelevant to Nichiren Buddhism. Still, this is all a surprise….

markatex
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:33 am

Re: Surprises in Buddhism?

Post by markatex » Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:02 am

Well, this really has to do with the way Buddhism has been presented in Western countries.

East Asian Buddhism is a very different thing than Indian or Tibetan Buddhism, and different still from the Theravada Buddhism of SE Asia. Really, the only form of East Asian Buddhism widely known here is Zen.

Academics for a long time have championed Theravada as the “original” Buddhism, so teachings like the Four Noble Truths have been presented as “real” Buddhism, while the Mahayana was, in decades past, regarded as superstitious folk belief for Chinese and Tibetan yokels. That isn’t so much the case anymore, but there still remains this general idea that Mahayana (and especially East Asian Mahayana) is a degraded form, except for Zen.

East Asian Buddhism does not emphasize the Four Noble Truths, and sometimes even looks a bit askance at them. They’re technically foundational, but not really talked about much.

Post Reply

Return to “Nichiren”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: narhwal90 and 27 guests