Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Brahman, taught right, is just a metaphor/raft to be left behind at "the other shore." But it's the last, stickiest metaphor to go in Advaita.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
That is debatable. An Advaita teacher I know said that he’s only encountered a single master of Advaita state that even Brahman or consciousness is not found at the end of the Advaitin path.
According to him this position is incredibly novel and he theorizes that this master must have refined his insight to a degree that others have not.
This statement was also not published publicly, perhaps because of its controversial nature.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
My teacher, who is a traditional Advaita Vedantin, constantly reminds me that NONE of the teachings have any meaning on the ultimate level (paramarthika). Though I will say that when I ask him if Atman is Brahman is One is also ultimately meaningless he tends to fall silent. Which seems appropriate, because I am not a jivanmukta dwelling in moksha, and even if I were, nothing can ultimately be said about atman or brahman or One. (For the record, I am not an Advaitin or a Buddhist, though I am a student of both.)
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
- tomschwarz
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:31 am
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
There no accomplishment that you or any master (even crazy wise ones) will ever attain, that othrs have not. Think of enlightenment as subtraction more than addition (see removing obscuration/buddha nature/etc...). Dont forget, conciousness is one of the twelve links of dependent origination. Dont go there. Then where to go?krodha wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:39 pm this master must have refined his insight to a degree that others have not.
i dedicate this post to your happiness, the causes of your happiness, the absence of your suffering the causes of the absence of your suffering that we may not have too much attachment nor aversion. SAMAYAMANUPALAYA
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Advaita Vedanta, the system they are referring to, is a different path... and this suggestion that they refined their insight more so than other Advaitains, who seem to get caught up with a certain degree of insight, is not something I made up.tomschwarz wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:36 pmThere no accomplishment that you or any master (even crazy wise ones) will ever attain, that othrs have not. Think of enlightenment as subtraction more than addition (see removing obscuration/buddha nature/etc...). Dont forget, conciousness is one of the twelve links of dependent origination. Dont go there. Then where to go?krodha wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:39 pm this master must have refined his insight to a degree that others have not.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Yes. Advaita Vedanta is such a reasoned and complete system that it's tempting to think that mastering the teachings, views, Sanskrit terms is the ultimate goal. But it isn't! It's only a stepping stone to the ultimate goal: realization of nonduality, moksha, end of karma/suffering/rebirth.
That said, Advaita honors/celebrates the mastering of every step along the path. Neo-Advaita not so much ... most neo teachers are laser-focused on the end goal of realizing nonduality and reject the steps leading to it, reject the entire notion of a path to realization.
That said, Advaita honors/celebrates the mastering of every step along the path. Neo-Advaita not so much ... most neo teachers are laser-focused on the end goal of realizing nonduality and reject the steps leading to it, reject the entire notion of a path to realization.
Last edited by Rick on Thu Jun 28, 2018 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
There is nothing to suggest that Moksha leads to the end of suffering from a Buddhist perspective.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
If true, then that's a nontrivial disconnect between Advaita and Buddhism.
The term nirvana, btw, is rarely (if ever) used in Advaita teachings.
The term nirvana, btw, is rarely (if ever) used in Advaita teachings.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
And what is there to suggest that Nirvana leads to the end of suffering from an Advaitan perspective?
Your argument is like: The Bible says that non-Christians will burn in hell forever.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Except it doesn't.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Yes it is a non-trivial disconnect.
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Unless you consider all apparent disconnects to be ultimately illusory.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
I'm in! But could I substitute eating and watching tv?
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
I don't think that's accurate.
It's more like Advaita accepts the conventional (vyavahara/mithya) truth of dependent origination, as it accepts karma and rebirth.
But, ultimately (paramartha/satya), neither dependent origination, karma, or rebirth are seen as true/real. This is true in Buddhism too, yes? Dependent origination, causality, karma, rebirth ... these are all conventional teachings.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
No, conventionally it asserts creation of the world by Ishvara.Rick wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:43 pmI don't think that's accurate.
It's more like Advaita accepts the conventional (vyavahara/mithya) truth of dependent origination, as it accepts karma and rebirth.
But, ultimately (paramartha/satya), neither dependent origination, karma, or rebirth are seen as true/real. This is true in Buddhism too, yes? Dependent origination, causality, karma, rebirth ... these are all conventional teachings.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Further, not all conventions are relative truths, some conventions are simply the mere relative.Malcolm wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 4:13 pmNo, conventionally it asserts creation of the world by Ishvara.Rick wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:43 pmI don't think that's accurate.
It's more like Advaita accepts the conventional (vyavahara/mithya) truth of dependent origination, as it accepts karma and rebirth.
But, ultimately (paramartha/satya), neither dependent origination, karma, or rebirth are seen as true/real. This is true in Buddhism too, yes? Dependent origination, causality, karma, rebirth ... these are all conventional teachings.
Re: Advaitin vs. Buddhist takes on awareness/reality
Yes, I stand corrected, thanks.
When I mention views that don't jibe with traditional Advaita, my teacher often says: "It's all mithya anyway, so feel free to use whatever helps nudge you to realization." I thought dependent origination was kosher for Advaitins in general, but I guess it's only kosher (as a teaching tool) for certain Advaitins, like my teacher.
Btw I am a huge fan of dependent origination, it's one of the cornerstones of my Gesamtkunstwerkweltanschauung! Ishvara otoh ... not so much.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...