imputation

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
[N.B. This is the forum that was called ‘Exploring Buddhism’. The new name simply describes it better.]
Post Reply
omnifriend
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:42 am

imputation

Post by omnifriend » Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:05 pm

Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta

DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 8589
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: imputation

Post by DGA » Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:31 pm

I don't see how one could understand a definite article (the), for instance, as an ultimate reality. What is "the" ultimately? How about the verb "to be": what is "is" ultimately?

what ultimate existence would a grammatical marker have?

User avatar
ClearblueSky
Posts: 465
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:27 am

Re: imputation

Post by ClearblueSky » Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:10 pm

It's not that they're imaginary, but our idea that it's a fixed permanent thing, and our idea that we see something as the "way it is" instead of through our own little filters and delusions, that keeps us from seeing the ultimate reality. We need to be careful not to delve too close to Nihilism.
And that's a pretty abstract question... but just as everyone has their own idea of what a place "is" that isn't real, it's the same for a word's meaning. "The" doesn't mean anything inherently, and thousands of years ago the word "the" was not even a concept (and it eventually probably won't again). And if you go to a country with another language now, the word "the" may still have no meaning, or may have a totally different one. It has no more solid reality than anything else.

User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
Posts: 7220
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA
Contact:

Re: imputation

Post by Johnny Dangerous » Thu Oct 10, 2013 3:02 am

omnifriend wrote:Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta
Language is even more made up than our projections, because it's just a way of describing the projections..
"it must be coming from the mouthy mastermind of raunchy rapper, Johnny Dangerous”

-Jeff H.

muni
Posts: 4268
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: imputation

Post by muni » Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:22 am

omnifriend wrote:Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta
:namaste: I guess things are not so due to our habitual grasping mind. That one is even able to see a wrong and right Ultimate Reality and many more. It is a great artist, itself Ultimate Reality but without the recognition of its nature.

o o

Metta.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Wayfarer and 60 guests