imputation

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
[N.B. This is the forum that was called ‘Exploring Buddhism’. The new name simply describes it better.]
omnifriend
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:42 am

imputation

Postby omnifriend » Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:05 pm

Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta

DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 8200
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: imputation

Postby DGA » Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:31 pm

I don't see how one could understand a definite article (the), for instance, as an ultimate reality. What is "the" ultimately? How about the verb "to be": what is "is" ultimately?

what ultimate existence would a grammatical marker have?

User avatar
ClearblueSky
Posts: 420
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:27 am

Re: imputation

Postby ClearblueSky » Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:10 pm

It's not that they're imaginary, but our idea that it's a fixed permanent thing, and our idea that we see something as the "way it is" instead of through our own little filters and delusions, that keeps us from seeing the ultimate reality. We need to be careful not to delve too close to Nihilism.
And that's a pretty abstract question... but just as everyone has their own idea of what a place "is" that isn't real, it's the same for a word's meaning. "The" doesn't mean anything inherently, and thousands of years ago the word "the" was not even a concept (and it eventually probably won't again). And if you go to a country with another language now, the word "the" may still have no meaning, or may have a totally different one. It has no more solid reality than anything else.

User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
Posts: 6502
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA
Contact:

Re: imputation

Postby Johnny Dangerous » Thu Oct 10, 2013 3:02 am

omnifriend wrote:Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta


Language is even more made up than our projections, because it's just a way of describing the projections..
May the eyes of living beings be gladdened by skies made splendid by clouds
that lightnings garland, while on earth below, the peacocks dance with joy as
showers of rain, falling gently, approach.

-The Door Of Happiness

muni
Posts: 3993
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: imputation

Postby muni » Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:22 am

omnifriend wrote:Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta


:namaste: I guess things are not so due to our habitual grasping mind. That one is even able to see a wrong and right Ultimate Reality and many more. It is a great artist, itself Ultimate Reality but without the recognition of its nature.

o o

Metta.
‘View like the sky’ means that nothing is held onto in any way whatsoever. You are not stuck anywhere at all. In other words, there is no discrimination as to what to accept and what to reject; no line is drawn separating one thing from another. ‘Conduct as fine as barley flour’ means that there is good and evil, and one needs to differentiate between the two. Give up negative deeds; practice the Dharma. In your behaviour, in your conduct, it is necessary to accept and reject.” Guru Rinpoche


Return to “Dharma in Everyday Life”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests