In brief, to think that things "are" is the root of attachment to everything.
Emptiness nutshells
Re: Emptiness nutshells
How about this from Lama Shang (trans. Peter Alan Roberts):
"The world is made of stories, not atoms."
--- Muriel Rukeyser
--- Muriel Rukeyser
Re: Emptiness nutshells
To me, emptiness, in a nutshell, is illusion. Nothing in the realm of phenomena is real. Every phenomenon, be it matter or be it a deluded mind, is an illusion. Even a pure phenomenon is an illusion. And finally, even emptiness itself is an illusion but only to the enlightened mind.
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Not to identify with all what can be known.
Not to be an owner of knowledges.
( dual, subject-object)
“To remain what knowns" ( nondual awareness, which is inexpressible); then clarity is as emptiness is.
When all solidness and all hardness and all separations, opinions, assertions, divisions, ideations, as clinging,......... is absent.
*Guru Rinpoche* And maybe this is necessary to practice emptiness?
"Don’t investigate the root of things,
Investigate the root of Mind!
Once the mind’s root has been found,
You’ll know one thing, yet all is thereby freed.
But if the root of Mind you fail to find,
You will know everything but nothing
understand.
A hundred things may be explained,
a thousand told,
But one thing only should you grasp.
Know one thing and everything is freed-
Remain within your inner nature,
your awareness!" http://keithdowman.net/dzogchen/dudjom- ... unsel.html
Not to be an owner of knowledges.
( dual, subject-object)
“To remain what knowns" ( nondual awareness, which is inexpressible); then clarity is as emptiness is.
When all solidness and all hardness and all separations, opinions, assertions, divisions, ideations, as clinging,......... is absent.
*Guru Rinpoche* And maybe this is necessary to practice emptiness?
"Don’t investigate the root of things,
Investigate the root of Mind!
Once the mind’s root has been found,
You’ll know one thing, yet all is thereby freed.
But if the root of Mind you fail to find,
You will know everything but nothing
understand.
A hundred things may be explained,
a thousand told,
But one thing only should you grasp.
Know one thing and everything is freed-
Remain within your inner nature,
your awareness!" http://keithdowman.net/dzogchen/dudjom- ... unsel.html
-
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:43 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: Emptiness nutshells
I'm afraid that any attempt at defining emptiness is going to fall far short of the mark. Just look at the volumes of works that have come down the ages commenting on its view. After all, Madhyamaka is ultimately about shattering our most basic view, ME.Sherab wrote:To me, emptiness, in a nutshell, is illusion. Nothing in the realm of phenomena is real. Every phenomenon, be it matter or be it a deluded mind, is an illusion. Even a pure phenomenon is an illusion. And finally, even emptiness itself is an illusion but only to the enlightened mind.
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Yes! By "definition" no definition of (or tagline about) emptiness can suffice.
Still, an accurate/right understanding about what qualified teachers who talk about emptiness are pointing to is important, right?
Also, for me, short instructions really help set my sights in the right direction ... even if that direction is "no direction."
I don't think having a short instruction in mind when practicing is helpful for everyone. (84,000 paths!) But it is for me ... and I'd guess at least some of my brethren and sistren out there in DWland?
Still, an accurate/right understanding about what qualified teachers who talk about emptiness are pointing to is important, right?
Also, for me, short instructions really help set my sights in the right direction ... even if that direction is "no direction."
I don't think having a short instruction in mind when practicing is helpful for everyone. (84,000 paths!) But it is for me ... and I'd guess at least some of my brethren and sistren out there in DWland?
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Gotcha. Makes sense. If you don't get it, and you attempt to practice it ... you'll be practicing samatha/vipassana at best, self-delusion at worst.krodha wrote:You either realize emptiness or you don't. "Practicing" consists of cultivating that insight through extended periods of equipoise after initial realization.
Which means you can't really say there is any "practice" related to emptiness unless you've had that realization to begin with.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Unfortunately, I have seen that being used as an excuse to be intellectually lazy, or to shut down a discussion. Or perhaps, it is just me. I find it uncomfortable not to have a sense of direction or to drop all probing and questioning just because someone says it is pointless.Anonymous X wrote:I'm afraid that any attempt at defining emptiness is going to fall far short of the mark. Just look at the volumes of works that have come down the ages commenting on its view. After all, Madhyamaka is ultimately about shattering our most basic view, ME.Sherab wrote:To me, emptiness, in a nutshell, is illusion. Nothing in the realm of phenomena is real. Every phenomenon, be it matter or be it a deluded mind, is an illusion. Even a pure phenomenon is an illusion. And finally, even emptiness itself is an illusion but only to the enlightened mind.
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Nice, thanks.Matt J wrote:How about this from Lama Shang (trans. Peter Alan Roberts):
In brief, to think that things "are" is the root of attachment to everything.
But one thing confuses me a bit. HHtDL said something like "Things exist, but we misunderstand how they exist." Which seems to go against what Lama Shang said. I'm guessing the (apparent) difference is due to their different traditions: Tshalpa Kagyu and Gelug. Yes?
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Muni, thanks. All good!muni wrote:...
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
-
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Emptiness has to be seen in order to be known. It can only be seen through practice. First of all endeavour to see the 'sameness' of all things. You will only see sameness if you see and feel what you see at the same time. How does what you see actually feel. Feeling what you see is Prajna/wisdom. It takes practice. You'll get it.
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.
- monktastic
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:48 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Emptiness nutshells
I am fond of the characterization (from Rob Burbea) that there is no way that things "actually are." Saying that there is such a way, but that it is beyond our imagination, still leaves a ledge for the mind to hang on to.
This undistracted state of ordinary mind
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.
--Gampopa
-
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:43 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: Emptiness nutshells
One can still have a discussion, but a lot of the useless questioning stops. You still have to ask yourself who is uncomfortable and who is the questioner.Sherab wrote:Unfortunately, I have seen that being used as an excuse to be intellectually lazy, or to shut down a discussion. Or perhaps, it is just me. I find it uncomfortable not to have a sense of direction or to drop all probing and questioning just because someone says it is pointless.Anonymous X wrote:I'm afraid that any attempt at defining emptiness is going to fall far short of the mark. Just look at the volumes of works that have come down the ages commenting on its view. After all, Madhyamaka is ultimately about shattering our most basic view, ME.Sherab wrote:To me, emptiness, in a nutshell, is illusion. Nothing in the realm of phenomena is real. Every phenomenon, be it matter or be it a deluded mind, is an illusion. Even a pure phenomenon is an illusion. And finally, even emptiness itself is an illusion but only to the enlightened mind.
- dzogchungpa
- Posts: 6333
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Seems are not what they thing.
A bit on the poetic side I admit, but I think it has a certain ring to it.
A bit on the poetic side I admit, but I think it has a certain ring to it.
There is not only nothingness because there is always, and always can manifest. - Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Re: Emptiness nutshells
"Useless questioning" - this is a presumption. There is no way anyone can know if a question is really useless since we are not omniscience.Anonymous X wrote:One can still have a discussion, but a lot of the useless questioning stops. You still have to ask yourself who is uncomfortable and who is the questioner.Sherab wrote:Unfortunately, I have seen that being used as an excuse to be intellectually lazy, or to shut down a discussion. Or perhaps, it is just me. I find it uncomfortable not to have a sense of direction or to drop all probing and questioning just because someone says it is pointless.Anonymous X wrote: I'm afraid that any attempt at defining emptiness is going to fall far short of the mark. Just look at the volumes of works that have come down the ages commenting on its view. After all, Madhyamaka is ultimately about shattering our most basic view, ME.
In my own experience, many a times I thought I have really have a firm grip on the meaning of emptiness. Fortunately, I did not stop probing. Each time, as I probe further, I find that my previous understanding was flawed or coarse. Now, I dare not even think that I will ever have a complete understanding of emptiness until such time that I attained omniscience. I find useless questioning rather useful really.
When I first started exploring the Dharma, I was sceptical when I read that the Dharma can be understood at various levels. My useless question was why can't it be and why wasn't it explained thoroughly in the first place? Now, I no longer think that way.
First, what can be explained is limited by available terms and understanding at that particular point in time or history. For example, certain terms and understanding made available by modern science were not available in the past.
Second, what one understands at any point in time depends on what one has explored and understood previously. If one stops exploring, one capacity to understand stops progressing. It also makes it difficult for one who has explore less and understood less to understand someone who has explored and understood more. For example, sometimes when I make a statement to see if my guru will agree with me, he chose to remain silent. I usually then would get the feeling that I have not understood enough. That is a signal to me to explore further. At other times, I would make a statement of my understanding and he would readily agree.
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Correct, it's a difference in tradition. The Gelug school teaches that phenomena are nonexistent on the ultimate level, but exist conventionally, and this conventional existence is regarded as being essential in avoiding the extreme of Nihilism. In fact, the Gelug tradition has a unique way of understanding the four extremes. In Gelug Madhyamaka, it is explained that the meaning of being free of the four extremes is that phenomena are free from the extreme of existence because they do not exist ultimately, and are free of the extreme of nonexistence because they exist conventionally, and the other two are simply impossible anyways.rachmiel wrote:Nice, thanks.Matt J wrote:How about this from Lama Shang (trans. Peter Alan Roberts):
In brief, to think that things "are" is the root of attachment to everything.
But one thing confuses me a bit. HHtDL said something like "Things exist, but we misunderstand how they exist." Which seems to go against what Lama Shang said. I'm guessing the (apparent) difference is due to their different traditions: Tshalpa Kagyu and Gelug. Yes?
Outside of the Gelug school they don't break down the four extremes by the two truths like that, and simply make the general statement that phenomena are free from the extremes of existence, non-existence, both, and neither. Some take issue with the idea of conventional existence all together, while others don't.
It is important to note however, that the conventional existence taught by the Gelug school is radically different than the ordinary way sentient beings take things to be real. In Gelug Madhyamaka, to say things exist conventionally means that they exist only as a mere designation from the perspective of a particular observer. Conventionally, a cup exists in the sense that from my perspective, I can look at it and based on its parts I can validly refer to it as a cup. But there isn't anything at all there from the side of the cup, it is only an appearance.
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Drink a cup of tea, do the laundry, etc, etc.rachmiel wrote:And what’s a good short instruction to bring yourself back to emptiness in practice?
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!
Re: Emptiness nutshells
I confess I've always had a hard time with the term "emptiness." In Buddhism it's not meant in a nihilistic way. And i wonder how and if compassion is not the nature of emptiness? Emptiness is really full...full of life, change, etc. There is nothing empty about existence, except perhaps it's empty of a solid sense of permanency and solidity. And pondering that is what it means to practice meditation on emptiness to me.
-
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:43 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: Emptiness nutshells
All you really know is your conditioned thinking. Apart from that, what is left?Sherab wrote:"Useless questioning" - this is a presumption. There is no way anyone can know if a question is really useless since we are not omniscience.Anonymous X wrote:One can still have a discussion, but a lot of the useless questioning stops. You still have to ask yourself who is uncomfortable and who is the questioner.Sherab wrote: Unfortunately, I have seen that being used as an excuse to be intellectually lazy, or to shut down a discussion. Or perhaps, it is just me. I find it uncomfortable not to have a sense of direction or to drop all probing and questioning just because someone says it is pointless.
In my own experience, many a times I thought I have really have a firm grip on the meaning of emptiness. Fortunately, I did not stop probing. Each time, as I probe further, I find that my previous understanding was flawed or coarse. Now, I dare not even think that I will ever have a complete understanding of emptiness until such time that I attained omniscience. I find useless questioning rather useful really.
When I first started exploring the Dharma, I was sceptical when I read that the Dharma can be understood at various levels. My useless question was why can't it be and why wasn't it explained thoroughly in the first place? Now, I no longer think that way.
First, what can be explained is limited by available terms and understanding at that particular point in time or history. For example, certain terms and understanding made available by modern science were not available in the past.
Second, what one understands at any point in time depends on what one has explored and understood previously. If one stops exploring, one capacity to understand stops progressing. It also makes it difficult for one who has explore less and understood less to understand someone who has explored and understood more. For example, sometimes when I make a statement to see if my guru will agree with me, he chose to remain silent. I usually then would get the feeling that I have not understood enough. That is a signal to me to explore further. At other times, I would make a statement of my understanding and he would readily agree.
-
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:43 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: Emptiness nutshells
It isn't something to be captured in thought. In a sense, it is unknowable. What is emptiness? What is fullness? What is unity? The words cannot create certainty.TharpaChodron wrote:I confess I've always had a hard time with the term "emptiness." In Buddhism it's not meant in a nihilistic way. And i wonder how and if compassion is not the nature of emptiness? Emptiness is really full...full of life, change, etc. There is nothing empty about existence, except perhaps it's empty of a solid sense of permanency and solidity. And pondering that is what it means to practice meditation on emptiness to me.
Re: Emptiness nutshells
Different strokes for different folks.Anonymous X wrote: All you really know is your conditioned thinking. Apart from that, what is left?