Page 2 of 4

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 7:09 am
by Grigoris
Malcolm wrote:The problem is that one should be aware when they die.
I remember, in another thread, that you said that nothing can obscure the experience of Clear Light at the time of death, so it was okay for people that are terminally ill to take sedation to dull their pain, as it will not effect the experience and their chances of liberation.

Is my memory unclear on the subject?

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:59 pm
by TharpaChodron
Grigoris wrote:
TharpaChodron wrote:
Malcolm wrote:Fentanyl is not a good way to die.
I wouldn't know, but it was Michael Jackson's drug of choice. which is very strange imo.
Why would opiates be strange drug of choice?
The biological effects of the fentanyl analogues are similar to those of heroin, with the exception that many users report a noticeably less euphoric high associated with the drug and stronger sedative and analgesic effects.[citation needed]
Because Fentanyl seems more geared to knocking you out, rather than having an experience. I have never thought of having surgery and being under anesthesia as a fun experience, but maybe I'm missing something. I guess it's popular also because it is an opiate and they happen to be very addictive.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:05 pm
by smcj
I heard a rumor that Aldous Huxley deliberately took some lsd immediately before dying. Talk about going out with a bang!

Any truth to that?

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:11 pm
by Grigoris
TharpaChodron wrote:
Grigoris wrote:
TharpaChodron wrote:
I wouldn't know, but it was Michael Jackson's drug of choice. which is very strange imo.
Why would opiates be strange drug of choice?
The biological effects of the fentanyl analogues are similar to those of heroin, with the exception that many users report a noticeably less euphoric high associated with the drug and stronger sedative and analgesic effects.[citation needed]
Because Fentanyl seems more geared to knocking you out, rather than having an experience. I have never thought of having surgery and being under anesthesia as a fun experience, but maybe I'm missing something. I guess it's popular also because it is an opiate and they happen to be very addictive.
It'll knock you out at the dose that knocks you out. At a lower dosage...

Anyway, some people like being knocked out, that is the experience they desire. They desire annihilation.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:15 pm
by Malcolm
Grigoris wrote:
Malcolm wrote:The problem is that one should be aware when they die.
I remember, in another thread, that you said that nothing can obscure the experience of Clear Light at the time of death, so it was okay for people that are terminally ill to take sedation to dull their pain, as it will not effect the experience and their chances of liberation.

Is my memory unclear on the subject?
If someone is not buddhist, and has no instructions, then they should be comfortable. But if you are a practitioner, you need to have a clear mind at the time of death.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 4:17 pm
by TharpaChodron
Grigoris wrote:
TharpaChodron wrote:
Grigoris wrote:Why would opiates be strange drug of choice?
The biological effects of the fentanyl analogues are similar to those of heroin, with the exception that many users report a noticeably less euphoric high associated with the drug and stronger sedative and analgesic effects.[citation needed]
Because Fentanyl seems more geared to knocking you out, rather than having an experience. I have never thought of having surgery and being under anesthesia as a fun experience, but maybe I'm missing something. I guess it's popular also because it is an opiate and they happen to be very addictive.
It'll knock you out at the dose that knocks you out. At a lower dosage...

Anyway, some people like being knocked out, that is the experience they desire. They desire annihilation.
Yep, some people do like that feeling, not me! A painless 'knock out' sounds comforting at the time of death, although quite unsatisfactory (from a Buddhist outlook.)

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:17 pm
by justsit
Anecdotally, in my four years as a hospice nurse I never saw a patient die who was conscious immediately prior, they were all unresponsive. Granted, some had large quantities of narcotics/sedatives/anxiolytics on board, but by no means all. In a "natural" death, the normal progression of bodily shutdown leads to unconsciousnes, at least in my observations.

That is not to say that hearing or some type of perception isn't present up to the moment of death, there's no way to know for sure. We always assumed the person could hear, as it's well known in the medical community that many patients who have been comatose report hearing was intact while in that state.

Having seen at least one hundred deaths, I can say that no one ever did the Hollywood version - final words with loved ones, exclaim "Goodbye, cruel world," close eyes and finis.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:59 pm
by Grigoris
Malcolm wrote:
Grigoris wrote:
Malcolm wrote:The problem is that one should be aware when they die.
I remember, in another thread, that you said that nothing can obscure the experience of Clear Light at the time of death, so it was okay for people that are terminally ill to take sedation to dull their pain, as it will not effect the experience and their chances of liberation.

Is my memory unclear on the subject?
If someone is not buddhist, and has no instructions, then they should be comfortable. But if you are a practitioner, you need to have a clear mind at the time of death.
But surely it is not the coarse mind that recognises the Clear Light? So what difference does it make?

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 9:53 pm
by Malcolm
Grigoris wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
Grigoris wrote:I remember, in another thread, that you said that nothing can obscure the experience of Clear Light at the time of death, so it was okay for people that are terminally ill to take sedation to dull their pain, as it will not effect the experience and their chances of liberation.

Is my memory unclear on the subject?
If someone is not buddhist, and has no instructions, then they should be comfortable. But if you are a practitioner, you need to have a clear mind at the time of death.
But surely it is not the coarse mind that recognises the Clear Light? So what difference does it make?
Sedatives obscure the clarity of the mind in toto because of they way the affect the body.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:29 pm
by Grigoris
Malcolm wrote:Sedatives obscure the clarity of the mind in toto because of they way the affect the body.
Just for your information: I am not trying to be contrary, I am trying to understand.

The elements dissolve and the sentient being falls into "darkness" (complete unconsciousness) and then when one "reawakens" the Clear Light experience happens. Now, at this point, the mind has seperated from the body so (theoretically) whatever you have done to the body is now irrelevant, isn't it?

And you haven't really answered my question: Is it coarse mind that experiences the Clear Light?

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:23 am
by TharpaChodron
justsit wrote:Anecdotally, in my four years as a hospice nurse I never saw a patient die who was conscious immediately prior, they were all unresponsive. Granted, some had large quantities of narcotics/sedatives/anxiolytics on board, but by no means all. In a "natural" death, the normal progression of bodily shutdown leads to unconsciousnes, at least in my observations.

That is not to say that hearing or some type of perception isn't present up to the moment of death, there's no way to know for sure. We always assumed the person could hear, as it's well known in the medical community that many patients who have been comatose report hearing was intact while in that state.

Having seen at least one hundred deaths, I can say that no one ever did the Hollywood version - final words with loved ones, exclaim "Goodbye, cruel world," close eyes and finis.
I'm very interested in hearing first hand accounts like yours. I often wonder how having a spiritual outlook affects people in their last days and things like that.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:21 am
by Nicholas Weeks
The slippery slope effect of euthanasia practices is real; over in Belgium a psychiatric hospital was planning to kill (with many legal "safeguards" of course) their mentally ill patients.

Pope Francis said stop:

http://www.catholicnews.com/services/en ... tients.cfm

Other down slope problems:

http://alexschadenberg.blogspot.ca

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:05 am
by Grigoris
Nicholas Weeks wrote:Pope Francis said stop:

http://www.catholicnews.com/services/en ... tients.cfm
Are you sure you are not a fundamentalist Christian?

Do you have the same opinion regarding the death sentence that you have for abortion and euthanasia, or are you just another frothing hypocrite?

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:19 pm
by Nicholas Weeks
Mother of four battles greed of insurance companies, expedient government and callous people.

phpBB [video]

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 11:33 pm
by Norwegian
Here's the opinion of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, someone who is much more relevant on a Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism forum than say, the Pope:

"Dalai Lama backs euthanasia in exceptional circumstances"
Asked his view on euthanasia, the Dalai Lama said Buddhists believed every life was precious and none more so than human life, adding: "I think it's better to avoid it."

"But at the same time I think with abortion, (which) Buddhism considers an act of killing ... the Buddhist way is to judge the right and wrong or the pros and cons."

He cited the case of a person in a coma with no possibility of recovery or a woman whose pregnancy threatened her life or that of the child or both where the harm caused by not taking action might be greater.

"These are, I think from the Buddhist viewpoint, exceptional cases," he said. So it's best to be judged on a case by case basis."
From http://www.tibet.ca/en/library/wtn/arch ... m=9&p=18_4


Also, from the early 90's, HHDL again on the same topic - including abortions:
The Dalai Lama, the 1989 Nobel Peace Prize winner and the self-exiled leader of Tibetan Buddhism, says that abortion and euthanasia are permissible under certain circumstances but that neither should be widely performed.

While on a national tour that brings him to UCLA today and UC Santa Barbara on Sunday, the Buddhist monk told a Houston audience this week that, "generally, abortion is not good" but that it "may be justified" in cases where the child would be born badly deformed or "the mother will suffer."

Speaking at Rice University, he said birth control should be used to prevent unwanted pregnancies. The best form of birth control is to become "a monk or a nun," he joked. "If that is not possible, then other methods are quite OK."

He said that euthanasia, or mercy killing, is a "very complicated" issue but that "from the Buddhist viewpoint generally speaking it is not good." It should only be performed, he said, where it is considered best for the "larger society," or for the patient himself.
From http://articles.latimes.com/1991-04-06/ ... dalai-lama


Also, Ringu Tulku Rinpoche speaking about euthanasia:
phpBB [video]

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 11:49 pm
by Virgo
phpBB [video]


Kevin

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 6:14 am
by Grigoris
Nicholas Weeks wrote:Mother of four battles greed of insurance companies, expedient government and callous people.
So, do you oppose the Death Penalty, or not?

PS Don't bother answering, I found this thread where you basically act as an apologist for capital punishemnt, so the extent of your hypocrisy is quite clear.

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:26 pm
by Strive
Virgo wrote:
phpBB [video]


Kevin
LOL i love that guy :applause:

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:34 pm
by Strive
Grigoris wrote:
Nicholas Weeks wrote:Mother of four battles greed of insurance companies, expedient government and callous people.
So, do you oppose the Death Penalty, or not?

PS Don't bother answering, I found this thread where you basically act as an apologist for capital punishemnt, so the extent of your hypocrisy is quite clear.
death penalty is bad but what u do with all the crazy killers and terrorist ppl? is it best to try to heal them instead?

Re: Assisted Suicide/ euthanasia

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:43 pm
by Nicholas Weeks
Grigoris is so rarely impersonal re Nicholas - too bad.

Pointing out the fact of capital punishment being practiced in Tibet does not mean I support capital punishment - I do not.