Greetings! I saw these two statues in the Rainbow Bazaar in Oahu. I don't recognize which buddhas or bodhisattvas they depict. The eight-armed statue appears to be holding a lotus and vajra, among other things. The red fellow may be in the Japanese style.
Thanks for your help!
Identifying two statues
Identifying two statues
- Attachments
-
- red buddha.jpg (101.55 KiB) Viewed 1625 times
-
- eight-armed buddha.jpg (193.41 KiB) Viewed 1625 times
Namu Amida Butsu
Re: Identifying two statues
The first one is Guan Shi Yin Pusa. The second one, it seems more like just any decorated Buddha. Nothing special.Monlam Tharchin wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:08 pm Greetings! I saw these two statues in the Rainbow Bazaar in Oahu. I don't recognize which buddhas or bodhisattvas they depict. The eight-armed statue appears to be holding a lotus and vajra, among other things. The red fellow may be in the Japanese style.
Thanks for your help!
Nice to hear someone in Oahu. I lived there last year in Mililani.
Re: Identifying two statues
I don't think the above is correct. Anybody have ideas? They were in a market instead of a temple, so I wonder if they're not actually specific buddhas. They did have an actual Guan Yin and Amida which I didn't photograph, however.
Namu Amida Butsu
Re: Identifying two statues
The second-one could be a form of Amogapasha Lokeshvara, an eight-arms manifestation of Avalokitesvara. Usually, Amogapasha is depicted standing (not sitting in meditation posture) and holding different hand implements such as water vase, noose, mala, scripture, trident and lotus flower. However, there are Amogapasha images from the days of the Khmer Empire displaying vajra, lotus, conch and so on, in manner similar to that statue.Monlam Tharchin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:31 am I don't think the above is correct. Anybody have ideas? They were in a market instead of a temple, so I wonder if they're not actually specific buddhas. They did have an actual Guan Yin and Amida which I didn't photograph, however.
"You have to make the good out of the bad because that is all you have got to make it out of."
- Robert Penn Warren -
- Robert Penn Warren -
Re: Identifying two statues
But why a Buddha-like figure instead of a bodhisattva figure? Unless it's just some sort of market Buddha that is stereotyped in a way with many arms or whatnot, I don't see it as accurate.cyril wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:59 amThe second-one could be a form of Amogapasha Lokeshvara, an eight-arms manifestation of Avalokitesvara. Usually, Amogapasha is depicted standing (not sitting in meditation posture) and holding different hand implements such as water vase, noose, mala, scripture, trident and lotus flower. However, there are Amogapasha images from the days of the Khmer Empire displaying vajra, lotus, conch and so on, in manner similar to that statue.Monlam Tharchin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:31 am I don't think the above is correct. Anybody have ideas? They were in a market instead of a temple, so I wonder if they're not actually specific buddhas. They did have an actual Guan Yin and Amida which I didn't photograph, however.
Re: Identifying two statues
My guess is both are Kannon.
The first looks like the style in which the gender is ambiguous. This evolved into a female appearance in China and Japan. The phallus looking object may be the tall vessel the feminine Kannon is often holding.
The second looks like an eight armed manifestation - Fukukenjaku.
See OnMarkProductions for more info http://www.onmarkproductions.com/html/kannon.shtml
The discrepancy in iconography may be due to the "folk art" nature of the second image.
The first looks like the style in which the gender is ambiguous. This evolved into a female appearance in China and Japan. The phallus looking object may be the tall vessel the feminine Kannon is often holding.
The second looks like an eight armed manifestation - Fukukenjaku.
See OnMarkProductions for more info http://www.onmarkproductions.com/html/kannon.shtml
The discrepancy in iconography may be due to the "folk art" nature of the second image.
There is no suffering to be severed. Ignorance and klesas are indivisible from bodhi. There is no cause of suffering to be abandoned. Since extremes and the false are the Middle and genuine, there is no path to be practiced. Samsara is nirvana. No severance achieved. No suffering nor its cause. No path, no end. There is no transcendent realm; there is only the one true aspect. There is nothing separate from the true aspect.
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
-Guanding, Perfect and Sudden Contemplation,
Re: Identifying two statues
Namu Amida Butsu
Re: Identifying two statues
The first statue is certainly Guanyin, but the hand implement is a ruyi scepter, not the bottle more commonly associated with Guanyin.Queequeg wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 11:52 am My guess is both are Kannon.
The first looks like the style in which the gender is ambiguous. This evolved into a female appearance in China and Japan. The phallus looking object may be the tall vessel the feminine Kannon is often holding.
The second looks like an eight armed manifestation - Fukukenjaku.
See OnMarkProductions for more info http://www.onmarkproductions.com/html/kannon.shtml
The discrepancy in iconography may be due to the "folk art" nature of the second image.
The second statue is a modern creative work, it does not follow any iconographic tradition whatsoever.