Question about rainbow bodies

Post Reply
Rakz
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am

Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Rakz » Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:12 am

Do rainbow bodies such as Padmasambhava and others ever achieve parinirvana in which they permanently put an end to helping sentient beings in this universe and the next and so on?

Josef
Posts: 1686
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Josef » Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:16 am

no
Kye ma!
The river of continuity is marked by impermanence.
Ceaseless flowing of appearance.
Beautiful and repulsive.
The dance of life and death is a display of the vast expanse.
With gratitude the watcher and the watched pass through the barrier of duality.

Rakz
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Rakz » Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:49 am

Josef wrote:no
Just found this quote by Malcolm.
Malcolm wrote:
gad rgyangs wrote:
im confused about where the samyak sambuddhas(rainbow bodies) are during the basis-bardo.
Parinirvana without any remainder.
Seems to be contradicting what you're saying.

User avatar
Thomas Amundsen
Posts: 1647
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Thomas Amundsen » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:29 am

Nighthawk wrote:
Josef wrote:no
Just found this quote by Malcolm.
Malcolm wrote:
gad rgyangs wrote:
im confused about where the samyak sambuddhas(rainbow bodies) are during the basis-bardo.
Parinirvana without any remainder.
Seems to be contradicting what you're saying.
This guy is referring to the time between universes when he says "basis-bardo." So, there is no contradiction.

User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 5652
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by kirtu » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:03 pm

Nighthawk wrote:Do rainbow bodies such as Padmasambhava and others ever achieve parinirvana in which they permanently put an end to helping sentient beings in this universe and the next and so on?
Rainbow body is a form of Buddhahood and Buddhas never end helping sentient beings.

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

Rakz
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Rakz » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:11 pm

tomamundsen wrote: This guy is referring to the time between universes when he says "basis-bardo." So, there is no contradiction.
So what he's saying is they enter parinirvana during that period and pop back up with the arising of the new universe to help those newly formed sentient beings?

User avatar
Thomas Amundsen
Posts: 1647
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Thomas Amundsen » Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:32 pm

Nighthawk wrote:
tomamundsen wrote: This guy is referring to the time between universes when he says "basis-bardo." So, there is no contradiction.
So what he's saying is they enter parinirvana during that period and pop back up with the arising of the new universe to help those newly formed sentient beings?
I think it's more like: there is no universe for buddhas to arise in, so they don't appear during that time period.

Rakz
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Rakz » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:20 pm

tomamundsen wrote:
Nighthawk wrote:
tomamundsen wrote: This guy is referring to the time between universes when he says "basis-bardo." So, there is no contradiction.
So what he's saying is they enter parinirvana during that period and pop back up with the arising of the new universe to help those newly formed sentient beings?
I think it's more like: there is no universe for buddhas to arise in, so they don't appear during that time period.
So I'm assuming they chill out in buddhafields since buddhafields are outside all samsaric realms?

Josef
Posts: 1686
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Josef » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:23 pm

Nighthawk wrote: So I'm assuming they chill out in buddhafields since buddhafields are outside all samsaric realms?
no
Kye ma!
The river of continuity is marked by impermanence.
Ceaseless flowing of appearance.
Beautiful and repulsive.
The dance of life and death is a display of the vast expanse.
With gratitude the watcher and the watched pass through the barrier of duality.

Pema Rigdzin
Posts: 1042
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:19 am
Location: Southern Oregon

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Pema Rigdzin » Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:51 am

Nighthawk wrote: So I'm assuming they chill out in buddhafields since buddhafields are outside all samsaric realms?
My take is that the real Buddha is the dharmakaya... it is uncompounded and beyond existing, not existing, both, or neither, so there can be no talk of it dwelling here or there or at this or that time... When there are beings to be tamed, the rupakaya appears accordingly. When there are no beings to be tamed, the rupakaya emanations dissolve back into the nature within which they arose.

Also, "samsaric realms" vs "non-samsaric realms" is a distinction that occurs in the minds of ordinary beings like you and I, not a Buddha's wisdom mind. We have not yet transcended ideas of pure and impure, so we imagine that there could be some portions of reality that are "samsara" and others that are "Buddhafields". But in reality it's not like that.

Rakz
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Rakz » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:36 pm

Pema Rigdzin wrote:
Nighthawk wrote: So I'm assuming they chill out in buddhafields since buddhafields are outside all samsaric realms?
My take is that the real Buddha is the dharmakaya... it is uncompounded and beyond existing, not existing, both, or neither, so there can be no talk of it dwelling here or there or at this or that time... When there are beings to be tamed, the rupakaya appears accordingly. When there are no beings to be tamed, the rupakaya emanations dissolve back into the nature within which they arose.

Also, "samsaric realms" vs "non-samsaric realms" is a distinction that occurs in the minds of ordinary beings like you and I, not a Buddha's wisdom mind. We have not yet transcended ideas of pure and impure, so we imagine that there could be some portions of reality that are "samsara" and others that are "Buddhafields". But in reality it's not like that.
Now this makes sense. Thank you.

User avatar
Fa Dao
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 5:42 pm

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Fa Dao » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:35 pm

heres a thought...
after a person has achieved rainbow body is it possible for them to physically incarnate again? or do they stay that way indefinitely?
"But if you know how to observe yourself, you will discover your real nature, the primordial state, the state of Guruyoga, and then all will become clear because you will have discovered everything"-Namkhai Norbu Rinpoche

User avatar
heart
Posts: 3993
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by heart » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:41 pm

Fa Dao wrote:heres a thought...
after a person has achieved rainbow body is it possible for them to physically incarnate again? or do they stay that way indefinitely?
Chetsun Senghe Wangchuk attained rainbow body and was later born as Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo, who then reveled the Chetsun Nyingthig.

/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut

"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 24950
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Malcolm » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:48 pm

heart wrote:
Fa Dao wrote:heres a thought...
after a person has achieved rainbow body is it possible for them to physically incarnate again? or do they stay that way indefinitely?
Chetsun Senghe Wangchuk attained rainbow body and was later born as Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo, who then reveled the Chetsun Nyingthig.

/magnus

JKW was an emanation, not a reincarnation, technically speaking.

Likewise, Vimalamitra is supposed to manifest an emanation every one hundred years or so. My teacher, Kunzang Dechen Lingpa was an emantion of Vimalamitra, etc.
Atikosha
Tibetan Medicine Blog
Sudarsana Mandala, Tibetan Medicine and Herbs
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


Relax, don’t worry about all the problems of samsara. Everything is relative. But try to be present.


— Chogyal Namkhai Norbu

Rakz
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Question about rainbow bodies

Post by Rakz » Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:21 pm

Malcolm wrote:
heart wrote:
Fa Dao wrote:heres a thought...
after a person has achieved rainbow body is it possible for them to physically incarnate again? or do they stay that way indefinitely?
Chetsun Senghe Wangchuk attained rainbow body and was later born as Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo, who then reveled the Chetsun Nyingthig.

/magnus

JKW was an emanation, not a reincarnation, technically speaking.
Is Chogyal Namkhai Norbu an emanation or reincarnation?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests