Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Forum for discussion of Tibetan Buddhism. Questions specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 4209
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Nicholas Weeks »

Malcolm:
As long as you are not indifferent and ARE mindful, you don't need rules, vows and samayas.
A possible typo corrected?
May all seek, find & follow the Path of Buddhas.
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6965
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by kirtu »

Malcolm wrote: There are various accounts of Virupa, and they do not all agree in particulars --
I hope you will publish the various accounts.
You really need to read Rin po che ljong shing
The THL translation tool can't parse that. Who wrote it? Would you please give the title in Tibetan? Precious Tree ( རིན་པོ་ཆེ ལྗོན་ཤིང་), Precious Wish-Granting Tree?
As for Dzogchen, all I can say is that in general Dzogchen practitioners are not governed by rules at all, there are no vows or samayas to follow in particular, no paths and stages, no particular conduct to adopt or reject. As long as you are not indifferent and mindful, you don't need rules, vows and samayas.
You mean other than maintaining the view. But this is where people (Black Rudra of example) can run into trouble. As Andreas Kreschmar has noted, around wisdom masters, everything gets enhanced. He was talking specifically in the context of "neurosis". So our confusion, ignorance, patterns of thinking, habits and defilements all get enhanced at least in part because blessing wisdom and our own budding wisdom has shone a spotlight on them. But if we can't deal with that, there is trouble.

The teaching of Buddha gotra or families also applies to people dealing with the poisons. ChNNR mentions in "Dzogchen and the Way of Crystal" (I think) that he had to be reminded of this. The Buddha Famly classifications are for people personally and their different characteristics and inclinations. Consequently people will need to deal with the poisons very carefully, gradually, suddenly, forcefully, or a mixture. There is a least one Nyingma teaching that combines all three approaches (Sravakayana, Paramitayana and Vajrayana).

Kirt
Last edited by Grigoris on Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fixed quote function
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

kirtu wrote:
As for Dzogchen, all I can say is that in general Dzogchen practitioners are not governed by rules at all, there are no vows or samayas to follow in particular, no paths and stages, no particular conduct to adopt or reject. As long as you are mindful and not indifferent you don't need rules, vows and samayas.
You mean other than maintaining the view.
Not even maintaining the view is a samaya.
But this is where people (Black Rudra of example) can run into trouble.
Tharpa Nagpo got into trouble because he had a nihilistic view, not because he had a good view.
As Andreas Kreschmar has noted, around wisdom masters, everything gets enhanced.
And he is an authority because...?
There is a least one Nyingma teaching that combines all three approaches (Sravakayana, Paramitayana and Vajrayana).
Kirt
Nyingma =/= Dzogchen.

M
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

kirtu wrote:Who wrote it? Would you please give the title in Tibetan? Precious Tree ( རིན་པོ་ཆེ ལྗོན་ཤིང་), Precious Wish-Granting Tree?
"rgyud kyi mngon par rtogs pa rin po che'i ljon shing/." In sa skya bka' 'bum. TBRC W22271. 6: 9 - 286. dehra dun: sakya center, 1992-1993. http://tbrc.org/link?RID=O01CT0026|O01C ... 025$W22271
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6965
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by kirtu »

Malcolm wrote:
kirtu wrote:Who wrote it? Would you please give the title in Tibetan? Precious Tree ( རིན་པོ་ཆེ ལྗོན་ཤིང་), Precious Wish-Granting Tree?
"rgyud kyi mngon par rtogs pa rin po che'i ljon shing/." In sa skya bka' 'bum. TBRC W22271. 6: 9 - 286. dehra dun: sakya center, 1992-1993. http://tbrc.org/link?RID=O01CT0026|O01C ... 025$W22271
Thanks! I saw it referenced in "The Yogini's Eye: A Comprehensive Introduction to Tantra", Ngor Thartse Khenpo Sonam Gyatso (Hiroshi Sonami) and Wayne Verrill earlier today.

The Precious Tree: Comprehensive Introduction to Buddhist Tantra, Volume 2: Direct Knowledge through Practice, Drakpa Gyaltsen,

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6965
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by kirtu »

Malcolm wrote:
kirtu wrote:
As for Dzogchen, all I can say is that in general Dzogchen practitioners are not governed by rules at all, there are no vows or samayas to follow in particular, no paths and stages, no particular conduct to adopt or reject. As long as you are mindful and not indifferent you don't need rules, vows and samayas.
You mean other than maintaining the view.
Not even maintaining the view is a samaya.
That's true. It's difficult. So Garchen Rinpoche and others give people start wheels like just maintaining Bodhicitta.
Malcolm wrote:
As Andreas Kreschmar has noted, around wisdom masters, everything gets enhanced.
And he is an authority because...?
He's a good guy, a good student of Tulku Urygen's, he's been around several wisdom masters and has seen that interaction, and it accords with what other lamas have told me and what I have observed.
Malcolm wrote:
There is a least one Nyingma teaching that combines all three approaches (Sravakayana, Paramitayana and Vajrayana).
Kirt
Nyingma =/= Dzogchen.
That's true but my "practice" of Dzogchen won't get too far.

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
User avatar
heart
Posts: 6279
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by heart »

Malcolm wrote:
Nyingma =/= Dzogchen.

M
Would be interesting if you could offer some proof of that strange idea, but there seems to be nothing at all.

/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut

"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
User avatar
heart
Posts: 6279
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by heart »

Malcolm wrote:
kirtu wrote:As Andreas Kreschmar has noted, around wisdom masters, everything gets enhanced.
And he is an authority because...?
And he isn't an authority because?

/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut

"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

heart wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
Nyingma =/= Dzogchen.

M
Would be interesting if you could offer some proof of that strange idea, but there seems to be nothing at all.

/magnus

Dzogchen is snga 'gyur early translation, but then so is yoga tantra, and so on, even Vinaya.

I would say that Nyingma = Guhyagarbha -- that is the main tantra of the Nyingma school.

But the main tantra of Dzogpa Chenpo is not Guhyagarbha, it is the sgra thal gyur.

Since this is the case, really, Nyingma is a Vajrayāna school. Further, Nyingma is a gradual path school. Dzogchen is not a gradual path at all, not even a little.

We have had this discussion in various forms for years, no need to hash it out again.

M
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

kirtu wrote:
That's true but my "practice" of Dzogchen won't get too far.

Kirt

The only one placing that limitation on you is yourself.
User avatar
heart
Posts: 6279
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Dealing With Desire

Post by heart »

Malcolm wrote:
heart wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
Nyingma =/= Dzogchen.

M
Would be interesting if you could offer some proof of that strange idea, but there seems to be nothing at all.

/magnus

Dzogchen is snga 'gyur early translation, but then so is yoga tantra, and so on, even Vinaya.

I would say that Nyingma = Guhyagarbha -- that is the main tantra of the Nyingma school.

But the main tantra of Dzogpa Chenpo is not Guhyagarbha, it is the sgra thal gyur.

Since this is the case, really, Nyingma is a Vajrayāna school. Further, Nyingma is a gradual path school. Dzogchen is not a gradual path at all, not even a little.

We have had this discussion in various forms for years, no need to hash it out again.

M
Vajrayana is fine with me, it has both the guhyagarbha and the gra thal gyur as well as thousands of profound terma teachings. To limit yourself to an exclusive non-gradual approach is not exactly helpful and for this reason there isn't a single master in any Dzogchen lineage that ever done that, at least to my knowledge.

/magnus
"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut

"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21908
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Grigoris »

Okay people. Took a fair bit of effort to clean this thread up so let's keep on topic. This thread is NOT about what dzogchen practice is or is not, it is about "Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire".

Stick to the topic otherwise I will be forced to hand out official warnings and/or suspensions.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Zhen Li
Posts: 2743
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:15 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Zhen Li »

If you sense a tasty piece of food, and then in your mind later you desire that tasty piece of food, thinking of all it's good and pleasurable and gratifying qualities, you can dedicate all the pleasure of that thought to the Buddhas. Similarly, when you sense the tasty piece of food, you can dedicate the pleasure to the Buddhas, and of course, when you are eating, you can visualise yourself as offering it to the Buddhas a food offering.
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

Ben Yuan wrote:If you sense a tasty piece of food, and then in your mind later you desire that tasty piece of food, thinking of all it's good and pleasurable and gratifying qualities, you can dedicate all the pleasure of that thought to the Buddhas. Similarly, when you sense the tasty piece of food, you can dedicate the pleasure to the Buddhas, and of course, when you are eating, you can visualise yourself as offering it to the Buddhas a food offering.
Which just generally reinforces the idea that common Mahāyāna is not about enjoying sense pleasures for oneself, unlike Vajrayāna.
User avatar
Zhen Li
Posts: 2743
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:15 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Zhen Li »

Malcolm wrote:
Ben Yuan wrote:If you sense a tasty piece of food, and then in your mind later you desire that tasty piece of food, thinking of all it's good and pleasurable and gratifying qualities, you can dedicate all the pleasure of that thought to the Buddhas. Similarly, when you sense the tasty piece of food, you can dedicate the pleasure to the Buddhas, and of course, when you are eating, you can visualise yourself as offering it to the Buddhas a food offering.
Which just generally reinforces the idea that common Mahāyāna is not about enjoying sense pleasures for oneself, unlike Vajrayāna.
Not if you are the Buddha who is eating the offering (which you are).
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

Ben Yuan wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
Ben Yuan wrote:If you sense a tasty piece of food, and then in your mind later you desire that tasty piece of food, thinking of all it's good and pleasurable and gratifying qualities, you can dedicate all the pleasure of that thought to the Buddhas. Similarly, when you sense the tasty piece of food, you can dedicate the pleasure to the Buddhas, and of course, when you are eating, you can visualise yourself as offering it to the Buddhas a food offering.
Which just generally reinforces the idea that common Mahāyāna is not about enjoying sense pleasures for oneself, unlike Vajrayāna.
Not if you are the Buddha who is eating the offering (which you are).

If you are practicing Vajrayāna there is no need to dedicate the enjoyment of the objects of the five senses to "the buddhas", you enjoy them since you are offering them to yourself. There is no method of doing this in common Mahāyāna. It simply does not exist there.
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6965
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by kirtu »

Malcolm wrote:
Ben Yuan wrote:If you sense a tasty piece of food, and then in your mind later you desire that tasty piece of food, thinking of all it's good and pleasurable and gratifying qualities, you can dedicate all the pleasure of that thought to the Buddhas. Similarly, when you sense the tasty piece of food, you can dedicate the pleasure to the Buddhas, and of course, when you are eating, you can visualise yourself as offering it to the Buddhas a food offering.
...
If you are practicing Vajrayāna there is no need to dedicate the enjoyment of the objects of the five senses to "the buddhas", you enjoy them since you are offering them to yourself.
If you have actualized your perception 100% as the deity. Otherwise you do explicitly (explicit in some way) offer the food to the deities. Various tantric practice explanations clearly explain how to make the offering (extensively as a visualized fire offering down to not extensively but still a visualization).

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Malcolm »

kirtu wrote:
If you have actualized your perception 100% as the deity.

Kirt

No. You do this as a practitioner on the path, not when you have realized mahāmudra. Anyway, you are missing the point -- which is: only in Vajrayāna (anuttarayoga tantra) does one make offerings to oneself as the deity from the beginning. These principles are so basic, I am surprised that practitioners who have been practicing for years do not understand this.
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6965
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by kirtu »

Malcolm wrote:
kirtu wrote:
If you have actualized your perception 100% as the deity.

No. You do this as a practitioner on the path, not when you have realized mahāmudra.
I didn't say when you had actualized Mahamudra. You have misunderstood me.

As a practitioner in Vajrayana you ideally perceive yourself as the deity 24x7. However this would rarely be the case. Therefore when eating, you generate yourself as the deity and make an abbreviated or extensive food offering as indicated in the teaching.

However, because people are not usually able to perceive themselves 24x7 as the deity, even weakly, they do not just get up in the morning, do sadhana and then when they eat, just eat the food like people normally do. There is transformation in the form of visualization that takes place.

People could read your statement as suggesting that you just eat the food and automatically it becomes an offering to you as the deity, etc. That would only be true if you have 100% actualized your perception as the deity - if you really never strayed from that perception. That would be remarkable.
Anyway, you are missing the point -- which is: only in Vajrayāna (anuttarayoga tantra) does one make offerings to oneself as the deity from the beginning.
No, I didn't miss the point. Common Mahayana does not have this method or many methods, etc.

But other behavior, other potential offerings with bodies are somewhat problematic. Food offerings aren't. But dealing with harsh speech is. Dealing with abusive people is. Transforming these into bliss can be difficult. Or in the case of sex, not being carried away by the mundane, physical bliss can be problematic to say nothing of transformation.

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
User avatar
Zhen Li
Posts: 2743
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:15 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: Uncommon Mahayana Approaches to Dealing With Desire

Post by Zhen Li »

Malcom wrote:No. You do this as a practitioner on the path, not when you have realized mahāmudra. Anyway, you are missing the point -- which is: only in Vajrayāna (anuttarayoga tantra) does one make offerings to oneself as the deity from the beginning. These principles are so basic, I am surprised that practitioners who have been practicing for years do not understand this.
Thanks for clarifying.

I hope it did not come across as if I was trying to pass my suggestion as an official practice of a lineage, it is just something I made up myself. Apologies.
:anjali:
Post Reply

Return to “Tibetan Buddhism”