Alaya consciousness - many questions.
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
(formatting mine)Adamantine wrote:From an interview with Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche via the Chronicles Project:
This basic ground does not depend on relative situations at all. It is natural being which just is. Energies appear out of this basic ground and those energies are the source of the development of relative situations. Sparks of duality, intensity and sharpness, flashes of wisdom and knowledge—all sorts of things come out of the basic ground. So the basic ground is the source of confusion and also the source of liberation. . . .
This is why I say there is a panentheistic paradigm to the enlightened state. That drives Malcolm crazy I know, but it is an issue of semantics, and it does seem an appropriate use of the term.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
- tellyontellyon
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:38 pm
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
That's fine, I'm interested in all of this and the thread is for everybody.And sorry telly if I seem to be hijacking your thread. I hope my questions are helping you too.
.
"Be melting snow. Wash yourself of yourself."
- Rumi
- Rumi
- cloudburst
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
I mean in the context of Madhyamaka.Punya wrote:What do you mean by 'as it is is being used in this discussion' cloudburst?cloudburst wrote:This is incorrect. Chandrakirti rejected the alayavijnana as it is is being used in this discussion.Malcolm wrote:Candrakirti accepts the ālayavijñāna. Tsongkhapa did not.
.
.
- cloudburst
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
That's right.conebeckham wrote: Chandrakirti rejects Alayavijnana as storehouse of habitual tendencies, etc--even on a conventional level of seeming?
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
There might not be an answer to this as Chandrakirti's job is essentially to refute but can you say in a nutshell what Chandrakirti's position is then?
Last edited by Punya on Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Isn't that the only context Chandrakirti writes in?cloudburst wrote: I mean in the context of Madhyamaka.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
- conebeckham
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Hmmm...cloudburst wrote:That's right.conebeckham wrote: Chandrakirti rejects Alayavijnana as storehouse of habitual tendencies, etc--even on a conventional level of seeming?
དམ་པའི་དོན་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ཆེ་བ་དང་།
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
I only have a smattering if ignorance on the subject, but I thought the Alayavijnana was not accepted by either Tsongkhapa or Chandrakirti. Malcolm has different ideas but, as contrary to common understanding as many of his positions are, he usually has some good textual basis for them.conebeckham wrote:Hmmm...cloudburst wrote:That's right.conebeckham wrote: Chandrakirti rejects Alayavijnana as storehouse of habitual tendencies, etc--even on a conventional level of seeming?
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
He rejected the yogacara interpretation, he did not however reject how it discussed in the Lanka, in fact he cites the Lanka in support of his interpretation...but didn't we alreafy have this discussion?cloudburst wrote:This is incorrect. Chandrakirti rejected the alayavijnana as it is is being used in this discussion.Malcolm wrote:Candrakirti accepts the ālayavijñāna. Tsongkhapa did not.
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Ok, now you've got my interest. In order to save you time and effort, if you could direct those of us following this thread to wherever it has been discussed before, I think we'd all appreciate it.Malcolm wrote: He rejected the yogacara interpretation, he did not however reject how it discussed in the Lanka, in fact he cites the Lanka in support of his interpretation...but didn't we already have this discussion?
I don't even know what the Lanka is.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
I assume he means the Lankavatara sutra. And, yes, please do tell us Malcolm. I usually get lost in the big DW discussions but so far I'm actually following this one.
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
- Adamantine
- Former staff member
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
- Location: Space is the Place
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
I am sympathetic because I never read the aforementioned thread either, however, some of you really need to start learning to use the search engine: it took me 30 seconds to find it. . . http://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=102&t=6823
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha
-
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Well, thanks for the link anyway. It's over my head. I'm out of my league. It happens.
Thankfully I do not believe that my progress on the spiritual path is contingent on understanding this stuff.
Thankfully I do not believe that my progress on the spiritual path is contingent on understanding this stuff.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Yep, too many rabbit holes and I agree that practice is the thing. Still it has been an interesting discussion and it has prompted me to get out a Chandrakirti commentary so that should me busy for a while.
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Fundamentally speaking, the way Jayananda is understanding Chandrakirti is that the ālayavijñāna is the the consciousness that apprehends emptiness.smcj wrote:Well, thanks for the link anyway. It's over my head. I'm out of my league. It happens.
Thankfully I do not believe that my progress on the spiritual path is contingent on understanding this stuff.
-
- Posts: 4209
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
- Location: California
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
From page 92 of Waldron:
It is in the Basic Section of the Yogacarabhumi (the Saptadakabhumika) that the
term alaya-vijñana seems to have been first used. In what Schmithausen takes to
be its initial occurrence, the alaya-vijñana is portrayed as a kind of basal consciousness
which persists uninterruptedly within the material sense-faculties
during the absorption of cessation (nirodha-samapatti). Within this form of consciousness
dwell, in the form of seeds, the causal conditions for manifest forms of
cognitive awareness to reappear upon emerging from that absorption. In its most
important terminological innovation, these modes of manifest cognitive awareness
are now collectively called forms of “arising,” or “manifesting [forms of ] cognitive
awareness” (pravrtti-vijñana), insofar as they intermittently arise or become
manifest in conjunction with their appropriate objects, and in contrast to the abiding,
uninterrupted stream of sentience newly called “alaya” vijñana.
May all seek, find & follow the Path of Buddhas.
- conebeckham
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
Well, I'm thinking this is consonant with the presentations of the eight consciousnesses I've heard from my (mainly Kagyu) teachers....maybe. In effect, the karmic "seeds" which are said to "reside" in the Alayavijnana, are NOT the Alayavijnana itself.....and where else would they reside than in some sort of ultimately empty yet cognizent awareness? I have to think about this some more.Malcolm wrote:Fundamentally speaking, the way Jayananda is understanding Chandrakirti is that the ālayavijñāna is the the consciousness that apprehends emptiness.smcj wrote:Well, thanks for the link anyway. It's over my head. I'm out of my league. It happens.
Thankfully I do not believe that my progress on the spiritual path is contingent on understanding this stuff.
One thing I will say, though, is that I feel the Alayavijnana is an insight that is pyschological in nature--and something many meditators have discussed. Chandrakirti, of course, was a great meditator as well as a great Buddhist logician, but his "main thrust" was ontological, not psychological. Perhaps his position was bent on avoiding any reification of "mind" as a permanent entity, but I don't see this as invalidating the psychological relevance of a "conventional" Alayavijnana.
But hey, what do I know?
དམ་པའི་དོན་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ཆེ་བ་དང་།
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
In reality, there are two Yogacara interpretations it seems.conebeckham wrote: In effect, the karmic "seeds" which are said to "reside" in the Alayavijnana, are NOT the Alayavijnana itself.....
One: ālayavijñāna is a consciousness which retains seeds. This is the later interpretation.
Two: ālayavijñāna and the seeds are coterminous: exhausting the latter eliminates the former. This seems to be the position of Asanga in Mahāyāna Samgraha.
The Nyingma approach to this is that there really are not nine consciousness at all. Consciousness derives its name based on its function in a given operation.
Re: Alaya consciousness - many questions.
If there are not nine consciousnesses, what is there?