Sorry again. Obviously reading Evans-Wentz and Arthur Avalon gave me the wrong idea...or maybe it was considered Mahayana back in their day, but no longer. Anyway, how do I get this inquiry to "Tibetan Buddhism" forum? Do I re-post it, ask the Mod to move it or what?Redfaery wrote:........the one specifically labeled "Tibetan Buddhism?" What you're looking for isn't even Mahayana at all. It's Vajrayana.umbra wrote:Sorry, is Mahayana not Tibetan Buddhism? Which forum are you referring?
Bardo and rebirth
Re: Bardo and rebirth
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:37 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
by the way this thread is going I think some reading of basic buddhism, including it's teachings and history would be of more benefit then reading arthur avalon.
Re: Bardo and rebirth
Sir John Woodroffe's 'Tantrik Texts' series traced the passage of Buddhism from India to Tibet, and its relationship with Yoga & Tantra. The Evans-Wentz books were at least at one time considered required reading for Tibetan Buddhism. Maybe that has changed. I have no interest in any form of Buddhism outside the Tibetan variety, and therefore no need to look into that. If my posting is in the wrong forum, I welcome its move to the right one.Fortyeightvows wrote:by the way this thread is going I think some reading of basic buddhism, including it's teachings and history would be of more benefit then reading arthur avalon.
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:37 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
Are you being serious?
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:37 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
how could one understand tibetan buddhism without understanding it's development and the context? I mean the context both physically and geographically and also within the larger buddhist world? evan-wentz made a serious contribution with his translation work but required reading? That's maybe a bit of an exaggeration. In fact it seems that a lot of the required reading for tibetan buddhists are texts which are not written by tibetans but by indians, this is why there is so much overlap with many of the most common and popular texts studied and recited in tibetan buddhist circles and those of other lineages. samatabadhra's prayer, nagarjuna, heart sutra, etc.
By the way, coincidentally, I recently got an awesome copy of evan wentz tibetan yoga book, five stars!
By the way, coincidentally, I recently got an awesome copy of evan wentz tibetan yoga book, five stars!
Re: Bardo and rebirth
I have no interest in becoming an armchair scholar of Tibetan Buddhism. My interest is in the Bardo teachings, three of the Six Yogas of Naropa, and maybe the Kalachakra. Everything else is a waste of my (limited) time and effort. I do not need to know about the Mahamudra, Dzogchen, etc., and I especially do not need to know about Theravada or Hinayana (at least no more than I already know). My interests are limited, and I never at any time claimed otherwise. As Buddhism arose in India and migrated to Tibet, it comes as no surprise that Indians have been prolific authors. As for Evans-Wentz, what may be an exaggeration today was not so, thirty-plus years ago. Back then, it seems Woodroroffe and Evans-Wentz was much more respected than they are today. As for more current required reading, try these:Fortyeightvows wrote:how could one understand tibetan buddhism without understanding it's development and the context? I mean the context both physically and geographically and also within the larger buddhist world? evan-wentz made a serious contribution with his translation work but required reading? That's maybe a bit of an exaggeration. In fact it seems that a lot of the required reading for tibetan buddhists are texts which are not written by tibetans but by indians, this is why there is so much overlap with many of the most common and popular texts studied and recited in tibetan buddhist circles and those of other lineages. samatabadhra's prayer, nagarjuna, heart sutra, etc.
By the way, coincidentally, I recently got an awesome copy of evan wentz tibetan yoga book, five stars!
Mind Beyond Death ISBN#9781559392761
Secret Doctrines of the Tibetan Books of the Dead ISBN#9781570626548
Death Intermediate State and Rebirth in Tibetan Buddhism ISBN#9780937938003
Sacred Tibetan Teachings on Death and Liberation ISBN#9781853270499
The Mirror of Mindfulness ISBN#9780877734574
Transcending Madness ISBN#9780877736370
Journey of the Mind ISBN#9781877294082
Natural Liberation ISBN#9780861717248
...and yes, some of the above were actually written by Tibetans.
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:37 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
Understanding the things you're talking about requires some knowledge of basic buddhist teachings
Understanding what happens during the dissolution and in the bardo requires understanding the workings of the aggregates and thus requires an understanding of 'hinayana' and 'mahayana' teachings. The empowerments for these practices require one to take refuge and bodhisattva vows. And so on and so on.
Talking about bardo and rebirth, what's reborn?
Ever heard of the storehouse?
Not saying that's it, but at least the conversation could be had...
Anyways required reading for tibetan buddhism would probably be things like the texts explaining the five topics of curriculum or maitreya's five texts.
Understanding what happens during the dissolution and in the bardo requires understanding the workings of the aggregates and thus requires an understanding of 'hinayana' and 'mahayana' teachings. The empowerments for these practices require one to take refuge and bodhisattva vows. And so on and so on.
Talking about bardo and rebirth, what's reborn?
Ever heard of the storehouse?
Not saying that's it, but at least the conversation could be had...
Anyways required reading for tibetan buddhism would probably be things like the texts explaining the five topics of curriculum or maitreya's five texts.
Re: Bardo and rebirth
umbra wrote:I have read that there are practices one can do while alive, and techniques to employ in the Bardo-state, that gives the ability to choose the next incarnation, but no details ever seem to be given. What are the specific techniques and practices that gives one control to pick the next rebirth?
Underconsciousness stay allways underconsciousness, dont necessary any support.
"I think these are practices specific to esoteric Tibetan Buddhism."
The buddhism from the tibetan is not different from the old shamanism of Tibet.
Re: Bardo and rebirth
Yes because we try speak about another worlds,another level of consciousness.Another worlds is not this world,and another level of consciousness appear in the brain as underconsciousness.And you know the Śālistamba sūtra speak about cittas.Dont have any self,no existence only moment of the consciousness.And can you see after death consciousness that is not like a citta,but i know that is it only broken mindness,because the man is only so accomplished when born.
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:37 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
The part of your post I was really questioning was "The buddhism from the tibetan is not different from the old shamanism of Tibet"
Re: Bardo and rebirth
In characteristic not different.Fortyeightvows wrote:The part of your post I was really questioning was "The buddhism from the tibetan is not different from the old shamanism of Tibet"
- Karma Dondrup Tashi
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm
Re: Bardo and rebirth
Well I'd be surprised if Tibetan shamanism pre-Guru Rinpoche had the four seals ...
I suspect the monasteries adapted shamanism to Buddhism not the other way round. The Bonpos may disagree ...
Cue the scholars ...
I suspect the monasteries adapted shamanism to Buddhism not the other way round. The Bonpos may disagree ...
Cue the scholars ...
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:37 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
This.Karma Dondrup Tashi wrote:Well I'd be surprised if Tibetan shamanism pre-Guru Rinpoche had the four seals
- ClearblueSky
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:27 am
Re: Bardo and rebirth
Let's be honest here, what it comes down to is that this concept, and many other basic concepts of Buddhism even, cannot be proven by science. Maybe they can't be disproven (nor can the hebrew god, ancient greek dieties, etc), but saying something is the true because it can't be disproven is a big logical fallacy... from a scientific viewpoint. From a scientific viewpoint, I don't think what you're saying is wrong. From a Buddhist viewpoint, it is incomplete, yes. Despite someone who is a neurosurgeon forming new beliefs because of a near death experience, the consensus in science is still that you cannot have thought processes or consciousness without a brain. There has been a lot of new openness to investigating this concept in science though, the concept of consciousness beyond a brain. Enough so that some scientists are presenting interesting scientific theories as to how that could be a possibility, but they're still just theories.silver surfer wrote:I'm fully open minded, fully.muni wrote:Seeing, talking, hearing, feeling… we can experience in night dreams. Its’ a whole world there which no other dreaming mind knows. A prove of their empty nature, I guess. In ND experiences many can confirm the amazing clarity with which the seeing, hearing, able to form thoughts…is experienced, even when there is no registered activity to observe anymore. There is for example the story of a neurosurgeon who experienced ND, which can maybe change the sceptical mind into a more open mind.Guru Rinpoche seems to be speaking as if we are able to see without having eyes, or able to form thoughts without having synapses or neural activity.
But I don't understand. Dreams, they happen in the brain. When I dream I'm always me, I'm always identified with my current body, never something else. Does it mean I'm actually my body? No. It just proves that 'the dreaming' happens in my brain depending on the experiences of this particular life. You think what I'm saying is wrong? How?
Sometimes you need to look at the philosophy and beliefs and pick a side, or at the very least decide "science hasn't explained it yet, but it resonates with my beliefs". Even reincarnation itself. It's pretty fundamental to Buddhism. There some (scientific) theories as to how it could work, but there is ZERO scientific proof, or really much that could even be considered true scientific evidence (please, no need to link to the stories of kids remembering past lives, or the neurosurgeon who had a subjective experience. True or not, it doesn't qualify as scientific). Sometimes you need to step outside the box to investigate if you feel there could be some truth beyond what's scientific for something (your example about brain synapses). Then, only you can decide what feels true for you, there's a lot no one will be able to prove... especially when it comes to more esoteric teachings.