Collective karma

General forum on the teachings of all schools of Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. Topics specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
User avatar
Grigoris
Global Moderator
Posts: 17996
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Collective karma

Post by Grigoris » Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:58 am

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:53 am
:jawdrop:
uhm... Left Field called and is asking how you jumped all the way over there... where did the "sheer coincidence" idea come into play from?

I understood Grigoris to mean that we effect each other because of our conditions, and our actions impact their conditions and the choices they make... hence if he punches me in the nose, I can choose to react or not, but my choice is completely conditioned to the event that just took place, and how I choose/react is my own karma through my own 3 doors, just as his was in punching me in the nose... so there are consensual conceptualizations which address the whole benefit or lack thereof of punching each other in the nose... because it's not 100% subjective, as we do affect each other's karma even though we are individuals making choices.

Did I completely miss/misunderstand a piece of this conversation?

re-reading again...

:reading:

EDIT: ok... i definitely missed something somewhere ... but can't find what...
I do believe you understand it better than I do.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde

User avatar
Mantrik
Posts: 1728
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Collective karma

Post by Mantrik » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:18 am

Malcolm wrote:
Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:40 pm

As St. Benedict observed, "Hell is full of good intentions."
I like the looser translation as: 'The Road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions'.

It is an interesting take on karma, with a belief that even with good intentions, our actions can still send us to hell if they cause harm.

This is closer to the Jain view than the Buddhist one, if I have it right, the Jains believing that unintentional killing still counts as completed karma.

In the context of 'shared karma' I would argue that whilst we can share an action, such as voting in a particular way, we can't share an intention.
http://www.khyung.com

Om Thathpurushaya Vidhmahe
Suvarna Pakshaya Dheemahe
Thanno Garuda Prachodayath

Micchāmi Dukkaḍaṃ (मिच्छामि दुक्कडम्)

User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 7061
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Collective karma

Post by Astus » Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:08 am

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:53 am
where did the "sheer coincidence" idea come into play from?
If an experience is not a result of one's own doing, that means one can suffer the consequences of external causes and conditions. Those personally unrelated events were what I called coincidence, because anything can happen to anyone without the individual being responsible for them. So, if a branch falls on somebody, that is just "bad luck".
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"

User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 7061
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Collective karma

Post by Astus » Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:52 am

Queequeg wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:41 am
If things were the way you say, there'd be no intelligible conversation between anyone.
Not exactly. If it were the case that one could influence the other, then one could make the other understand. However, even the Buddha could not enlighten Ananda nor change the mind of Devadatta.
I think your idealism is a handicap.
What I say is that because experiences are defined by one's mental conditioning, no matter what occurs, it is not because others' make it happen, or because of some external force, but because of one's own delusion. If it were the case that independent factors controlled one's experience, there would be nothing to be done about those, and neither one's behaviour nor one's mental purity would matter.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"

User avatar
Ogyen
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Ogyen » Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:48 pm

Astus wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:08 am
Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:53 am
where did the "sheer coincidence" idea come into play from?
If an experience is not a result of one's own doing, that means one can suffer the consequences of external causes and conditions.
This is basically no-self. What isn't you sucks and causes your attached self to suffer. Aging, dying, illness... These are not your "doing" in the way you express it.

If your stepfather rapes you... You didn't marry the guy, you didn't even ask for him to be in your home, you didn't rape yourself, and you didn't ask for it... Is it your doing that you were raped? No! So is it a coincidence because it isn't your doing?

I think there is a gross misunderstanding of what karma is and isn't in this statement.
Astus wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:08 am
Those unrelated events were what I called coincidence, because anything can happen to anyone without the individual being responsible for them. So, if a branch falls on somebody, that is just "bad luck".
Again. Regardless of what you personally call it, this is a gross misunderstanding of the principle of karma. There are no "unrelated events" just ignorance and the ability to see or not see them. Everything existing has a causality. Sometimes causalities meet. Like and intricate outlet systems of rivers. I may not be responsible for being raped by my stepfather (per previous example) and now my karma is to manage all the sequence of events that comes out of it. If my karma is reallllly bad I might rape back. If it is really good I might make it my mission to protect children in the world. My karma has as much to do with the conditions I've cultivated to handle inevitable pain. Regardless of "who seems at fault", the event placed my being in that time and space and according to previous aspirations and karmic conditions that led me there, and then the choices I have, at the point of needing to take actions, are all based on my awareness (cultivated qualities) that will permit me to decrease or increase suffering as a result of that karma. If I don't know how to manage rape and abuse I might fetishise it as a child and grow up repeating this scenario to others. If I realize there ARE tools like therapy and meditation and learn all about the cycle of violence, my capacity to learn this is also a karma from cultivated conditions. My own ignorance is my transparent cage. You think you have a choice... But much of your choice really is self determined by what qualities you habituate/cultivate.

This is why it is so important to cultivate the positive qualities. Not because of moral ground, because what you know is how you suffer. The more you integrate, the less any relative event sways you into suffering.

:meditate:
Last edited by Ogyen on Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:33 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Image Made from 100% recycled karma

The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum

"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 6389
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Queequeg » Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:54 pm

Astus wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:52 am
Queequeg wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:41 am
If things were the way you say, there'd be no intelligible conversation between anyone.
Not exactly. If it were the case that one could influence the other, then one could make the other understand. However, even the Buddha could not enlighten Ananda nor change the mind of Devadatta.
You're assuming something I am not.

Influence does not amount to directly and immediately causing another to understand. The Buddha certainly influenced Ananda and Devadatta. To suggest otherwise is just obtuse.
I think your idealism is a handicap.
What I say is that because experiences are defined by one's mental conditioning, no matter what occurs, it is not because others' make it happen, or because of some external force, but because of one's own delusion. If it were the case that independent factors controlled one's experience, there would be nothing to be done about those, and neither one's behaviour nor one's mental purity would matter.
The atomistic bias does not hold up. The fact that you are participating in this exchange undermines your whole argument, unless of course as Greg has facetiously suggested you really believe all of this is nothing more than a figment of your imagination. Its not an either/or situation. Internal vectors do not preclude external factors. There is always mutuality.

I think we're at an impasse.
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

There are beings with little dust in their eyes who are falling away because they do not hear the Dhamma. There will be those who will understand the Dhamma.
-Ayacana Sutta

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 28532
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Collective karma

Post by Malcolm » Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:09 pm

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:48 pm

Again. Regardless of what you personally call it, this is a gross misunderstanding of the principle of karma. There are no "unrelated events" just ignorance and the ability to see or not see them. Everything existing has a causality. Sometimes causalities meet. Like and intricate outlet systems of rivers. I may not be responsible for being raped by my stepfather (per previous example) and now my karma is to manage all the sequence of events that comes out of it.
Just to inject some definition into this discussion: the Buddha, Naḡārjuna, and Vasuabandhu in one voice proclaim, "Karma is volition (cetana) and what proceeds from volition."

Then there is karma vipaka, of which there are three kinds: 1) the ripened result, 2) the result that corresponds to the cause, and 3) the dominant result.

With respect to the first, the Ratnavali states:

One is born in hell through hatred;
one is born into the preta realm through desire;
and one is generally born as an animal through confusion.


As for the second:

Due to taking life, life is short.
Due to stealing, one is impoverished.
Due to sexual impropriety, one has enemies.
Due to lying, one is criticized.
Due to calumny, one is separated from friends.
Due to harsh words, one hears unpleasantness.
Due to gossip, one’s word has no value.
Due to greed, one’s hopes will be dashed.
Due to malice, one will have fear.
Due to wrong view, one’s view will be bad.


As for the third, the dominant result, Khenpo Ngalo states (and this is all very standard):

The dominant result is said to ripen as the container universe where one is born and lives. For instance, due to taking life, one must be born and live in a bleak region with ravines and so on that are harmful to life. Likewise, due to taking what has not been given, frost and hail will arise, fruit will not form on trees, and famines will arise. Due to improper desire, one must live in a place with thick dust and where there are many unpleasant things such as feces, urine, swamps and so on. Due to lying, one must live in a place that is polluted and foul-smelling, one’s wealth will not be stable, and the country will be frightening. Due to calumny, one is born in a region that is uneven, with ravines and gorges. Due to harsh words, one is born in an unhappy place that is salty and so on. Due to idle speech one is born in a place where rice does not grow; even if one farms, the seasons are not constant; and so on. Due to greed, one lives in a place where the harvest is damaged, the grain is small, and one is born during a bad time. Due to malice, one is always frightened, there are frequent injuries, and one is born in a place where the grains have a bitter taste. Due to wrong view, even though the grain is not small, [136/a] there is little wealth, and one is born without refuge and defenders.

The Ratnavali sums it up:

Though those engaged in nonvirtue desire happiness,
but where ever they go,
they are crushed by suffering
because of that nonvirtue then and there.


If my karma is reallllly bad I might rape back. If it is really good I might make it my mission to protect children in the world. My karma has as much to do with the conditions I've cultivated to handle inevitable pain. Regardless of "who seems at fault", the event placed my being in that time and space and according to previous aspirations and karmic conditions that led me there, and then the choices I have, at the point of needing to take actions, are all based on my awareness (cultivated qualities) that will permit me to decrease or increase suffering as a result of that karma. If I don't know how to manage rape and abuse I might fetishise it as a child and grow up repeating this scenario to others. If I realize there ARE tools like therapy and meditation and learn all about the cycle of violence, my capacity to learn this is also a karma from cultivated conditions. My own ignorance is my transparent cage. You think you have a choice... But much of your choice really is self determined by what qualities you habituate/cultivate.

This is why it is so important to cultivate the positive qualities. Not because of moral ground, because what you know is how you suffer. The more you integrate, the less any relative event sways you into suffering.

:meditate:
As the Ratnavali states:

This Dharma liberates one from
hell realms, preta realms, and animal realms.
and one attains an increase of happiness, wealth, and political power
among devas and humans.


The Buddha said:

The correct mundane view
exists in one who is great;
that prevents going to lower realms
for a thousand eons.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.

-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.

-- Samadhirāja Sūtra

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 6389
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Queequeg » Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:50 pm

Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:09 pm
The dominant result is said to ripen as the container universe where one is born and lives. For instance, due to taking life, one must be born and live in a bleak region with ravines and so on that are harmful to life. Likewise, due to taking what has not been given, frost and hail will arise, fruit will not form on trees, and famines will arise. Due to improper desire, one must live in a place with thick dust and where there are many unpleasant things such as feces, urine, swamps and so on. Due to lying, one must live in a place that is polluted and foul-smelling, one’s wealth will not be stable, and the country will be frightening. Due to calumny, one is born in a region that is uneven, with ravines and gorges. Due to harsh words, one is born in an unhappy place that is salty and so on. Due to idle speech one is born in a place where rice does not grow; even if one farms, the seasons are not constant; and so on. Due to greed, one lives in a place where the harvest is damaged, the grain is small, and one is born during a bad time. Due to malice, one is always frightened, there are frequent injuries, and one is born in a place where the grains have a bitter taste. Due to wrong view, even though the grain is not small, [136/a] there is little wealth, and one is born without refuge and defenders.

The Ratnavali sums it up:

Though those engaged in nonvirtue desire happiness,
but where ever they go,
they are crushed by suffering
because of that nonvirtue then and there.
Is the "container universe" collectively conjured or not?
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

There are beings with little dust in their eyes who are falling away because they do not hear the Dhamma. There will be those who will understand the Dhamma.
-Ayacana Sutta

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 28532
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Collective karma

Post by Malcolm » Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:56 pm

Queequeg wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:50 pm
Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:09 pm
The dominant result is said to ripen as the container universe where one is born and lives. For instance, due to taking life, one must be born and live in a bleak region with ravines and so on that are harmful to life. Likewise, due to taking what has not been given, frost and hail will arise, fruit will not form on trees, and famines will arise. Due to improper desire, one must live in a place with thick dust and where there are many unpleasant things such as feces, urine, swamps and so on. Due to lying, one must live in a place that is polluted and foul-smelling, one’s wealth will not be stable, and the country will be frightening. Due to calumny, one is born in a region that is uneven, with ravines and gorges. Due to harsh words, one is born in an unhappy place that is salty and so on. Due to idle speech one is born in a place where rice does not grow; even if one farms, the seasons are not constant; and so on. Due to greed, one lives in a place where the harvest is damaged, the grain is small, and one is born during a bad time. Due to malice, one is always frightened, there are frequent injuries, and one is born in a place where the grains have a bitter taste. Due to wrong view, even though the grain is not small, [136/a] there is little wealth, and one is born without refuge and defenders.

The Ratnavali sums it up:

Though those engaged in nonvirtue desire happiness,
but where ever they go,
they are crushed by suffering
because of that nonvirtue then and there.
Is the "container universe" collectively conjured or not?
Conjured? No. Does it arise from the total aggregate of all sentient beings actions, yes.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.

-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.

-- Samadhirāja Sūtra

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 6389
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Queequeg » Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:02 pm

Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:56 pm
Is the "container universe" collectively conjured or not?
Conjured? No. Does it arise from the total aggregate of all sentient beings actions, yes.
Is it incorrect to then say that it is collective karma? Do you see a problem with characterizing it that way? If so, can you elaborate on those pitfalls?
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

There are beings with little dust in their eyes who are falling away because they do not hear the Dhamma. There will be those who will understand the Dhamma.
-Ayacana Sutta

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 28532
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Collective karma

Post by Malcolm » Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:17 pm

Queequeg wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:02 pm
Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:56 pm
Is the "container universe" collectively conjured or not?
Conjured? No. Does it arise from the total aggregate of all sentient beings actions, yes.
Is it incorrect to then say that it is collective karma? Do you see a problem with characterizing it that way? If so, can you elaborate on those pitfalls?
You cannot gather karma for me, I cannot gather it for you. "Collective karma" assumes that groups share karma. This is true only insofar as similar actions bear similar results. But for example, claiming that Jews in the holocaust suffered from collective karma is wrongheaded.
Sometimes around here, we see some people throwing around irresponsible claims such as black people being angry and wishing to harm white people is the result of the karma of white oppression, which is absurd. It is just as absurd as the claim that black people suffering from oppression is from racial karma.
Last edited by Malcolm on Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.

-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.

-- Samadhirāja Sūtra

User avatar
Queequeg
Global Moderator
Posts: 6389
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Queequeg » Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:20 pm

Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:17 pm
Queequeg wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:02 pm
Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:56 pm

Conjured? No. Does it arise from the total aggregate of all sentient beings actions, yes.
Is it incorrect to then say that it is collective karma? Do you see a problem with characterizing it that way? If so, can you elaborate on those pitfalls?
You cannot gather karma for me, I cannot gather it for you. "Collective karma" assumes that groups share karma. This is true only insofar as similar actions bear similar results. But for example, claiming that Jews in the holocaust suffered from collective karma is wrongheaded.
Gotcha.

So my road trip analogy above is roughly right.
Those who, even with distracted minds,
Entered a stupa compound
And chanted but once, “Namo Buddhaya!”
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.

-Lotus Sutra, Expedient Means Chapter

There are beings with little dust in their eyes who are falling away because they do not hear the Dhamma. There will be those who will understand the Dhamma.
-Ayacana Sutta

User avatar
Ogyen
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Ogyen » Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:38 pm

Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:17 pm

You cannot gather karma for me, I cannot gather it for you. "Collective karma" assumes that groups share karma. This is true only insofar as similar actions bear similar results. But for example, claiming that Jews in the holocaust suffered from collective karma is wrongheaded.
Thank you for such clarity... This is crystal clear. We're all alone in this, together. So is this why teachers like Thich That Hanh stress the importance of interbeing?
Image Made from 100% recycled karma

The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum

"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 28532
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Collective karma

Post by Malcolm » Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:01 pm

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:38 pm
Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:17 pm

You cannot gather karma for me, I cannot gather it for you. "Collective karma" assumes that groups share karma. This is true only insofar as similar actions bear similar results. But for example, claiming that Jews in the holocaust suffered from collective karma is wrongheaded.
Thank you for such clarity... This is crystal clear. We're all alone in this, together. So is this why teachers like Thich That Hanh stress the importance of interbeing?
Interbeing is an extension of dependent origination, based on East Asian ideas.

But dependent origination, when reduced to its essential components, simply means: where there is affliction, there is a cause for action; where there is action there is a cause for suffering; and where there is suffering, there is a condition for further affliction. Without affliction, there is no cause for action; without action, there is no result, suffering.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.

-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.

-- Samadhirāja Sūtra

User avatar
Ogyen
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Ogyen » Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:47 pm

Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:01 pm
Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:38 pm
Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:17 pm

You cannot gather karma for me, I cannot gather it for you. "Collective karma" assumes that groups share karma. This is true only insofar as similar actions bear similar results. But for example, claiming that Jews in the holocaust suffered from collective karma is wrongheaded.
Thank you for such clarity... This is crystal clear. We're all alone in this, together. So is this why teachers like Thich That Hanh stress the importance of interbeing?
Interbeing is an extension of dependent origination, based on East Asian ideas.

But dependent origination, when reduced to its essential components, simply means: where there is affliction, there is a cause for action; where there is action there is a cause for suffering; and where there is suffering, there is a condition for further affliction. Without affliction, there is no cause for action; without action, there is no result, suffering.
So a Buddha's actions don't cause karma and therefore suffering (further affliction) because they are no longer bound to the cycle of dependent origination?
Image Made from 100% recycled karma

The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum

"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 28532
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Collective karma

Post by Malcolm » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:16 pm

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:47 pm
Malcolm wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:01 pm
Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:38 pm


Thank you for such clarity... This is crystal clear. We're all alone in this, together. So is this why teachers like Thich That Hanh stress the importance of interbeing?
Interbeing is an extension of dependent origination, based on East Asian ideas.

But dependent origination, when reduced to its essential components, simply means: where there is affliction, there is a cause for action; where there is action there is a cause for suffering; and where there is suffering, there is a condition for further affliction. Without affliction, there is no cause for action; without action, there is no result, suffering.
So a Buddha's actions don't cause karma and therefore suffering (further affliction) because they are no longer bound to the cycle of dependent origination?
A Buddhas deeds are not based on afflcition (desire, hatred, and ignorance); they are based on wisdom. Hence, they do not result in suffering.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.

-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.

-- Samadhirāja Sūtra

User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 7061
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Collective karma

Post by Astus » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:22 pm

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:48 pm
Is it your doing that you were raped? No! So is it a coincidence because it isn't your doing?
Good and bad experiences are the result of good and bad deeds. That is the basic concept of how action and result work (see: Cūḷakammavibhaṅgasutta). Furthermore, the results are not produced by someone else, but everybody is an heir to one's own actions. At the same time, it is also not the case that there are really agents, it is only dependent origination (Timbarukasutta; also Natumhasutta). In fact, not just one or two things, but the whole world is a product of dependent origination (Lokasutta). So, to say that there are things happening to oneself because of others' will or because of different independent factors, does not fit into what the Buddha taught about karma.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"

User avatar
Grigoris
Global Moderator
Posts: 17996
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Collective karma

Post by Grigoris » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:47 pm

Astus wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:22 pm
Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:48 pm
Is it your doing that you were raped? No! So is it a coincidence because it isn't your doing?
Good and bad experiences are the result of good and bad deeds. That is the basic concept of how action and result work (see: Cūḷakammavibhaṅgasutta). Furthermore, the results are not produced by someone else, but everybody is an heir to one's own actions. At the same time, it is also not the case that there are really agents, it is only dependent origination (Timbarukasutta; also Natumhasutta). In fact, not just one or two things, but the whole world is a product of dependent origination (Lokasutta). So, to say that there are things happening to oneself because of others' will or because of different independent factors, does not fit into what the Buddha taught about karma.
So how does learning happen then? What is the role of a Buddha if, as you posit, essentially there is no interaction and influence between beings?
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde

User avatar
Ogyen
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: Collective karma

Post by Ogyen » Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:16 pm

Astus wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:22 pm
Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 3:48 pm
Is it your doing that you were raped? No! So is it a coincidence because it isn't your doing?
Good and bad experiences are the result of good and bad deeds. That is the basic concept of how action and result work (see: Cūḷakammavibhaṅgasutta). Furthermore, the results are not produced by someone else, but everybody is an heir to one's own actions. At the same time, it is also not the case that there are really agents, it is only dependent origination (Timbarukasutta; also Natumhasutta). In fact, not just one or two things, but the whole world is a product of dependent origination (Lokasutta). So, to say that there are things happening to oneself because of others' will or because of different independent factors, does not fit into what the Buddha taught about karma.
This is a subtle change of subject and a definite twisting of my words and the context in which my statement is quoted. Also what you note does not contradict the spirit of what I wrote while quoting me out of context.

We were talking about "coincidence" in the way you had posited
If an experience is not a result of one's own doing, that means one can suffer the consequences of external causes and conditions.
Image Made from 100% recycled karma

The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum

"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy

User avatar
Malcolm
Posts: 28532
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Collective karma

Post by Malcolm » Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:31 pm

Ogyen wrote:
Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:16 pm

This is a subtle change of subject and a definite twisting of my words and the context in which my statement is quoted. Also what you note does not contradict the spirit of what I wrote while quoting me out of context.
Idiot theory of karma is "tit for tatism": I raped someone in a past life, now in this life they will rape me.

Actual theory of karma is not deterministic but based on probability. If you have negative dominant karma and are born in a war torn country based on the criteria given above, your chances of having a short life and a violent death are increased exponentially.
Buddhahood in This Life
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔


[A]nything at all that is well spoken is the word of the Buddha.

-- Ārya-adhyāśaya-sañcodana-nāma-mahāyāna-sūtra

The different sūtras in accord with the emptiness
taught by the Sugata are definitive in meaning;
One can understand that all of those Dharmas in
which a sentient being, individual, or person are taught are provisional in meaning.

-- Samadhirāja Sūtra

Post Reply

Return to “Mahāyāna Buddhism”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Coëmgenu, ItsRaining, smcj, Tiago Simões and 35 guests