Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
What are common points and differences in the way mind essence is introduced (how the recognition is further developed) in tibetan buddhism and in advaita vedanta system? I mean looking at satsangs of Mooji (mooji.org), teachings of Ramana Maharshi, Papaji plus the way this tradition is appreciated by some western dharma teachers (Elio Guarisco, Adriano Clemente), maybe one can learn and take inspiration from it even being a practitioner of tibetan buddhism.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
One can get inspired by anything. By inspiration I mean inspiration to practice. Coming to some sort of understanding can be a different matter entirely. Funnily I listened Mooji for a bit yesterday for the first time and I think what he is about has nothing to do with how mind essence is introduced in TB...
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
- Shabkar
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
For most people, this is more likely to result in confusion and misunderstandings than in inspiration.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Advaita and Buddhadharma have nothing in common at all, apart from a shared theory that suffering is a result of afflictions. Their respective solutions to this problem are like the difference between night and day, however.
-
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:29 am
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
true dharma is inexpressible.
The bodhisattva nourishes from bodhicitta, through whatever method the Buddha has given him. Oh joy.
The bodhisattva nourishes from bodhicitta, through whatever method the Buddha has given him. Oh joy.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
The two traditions seem far more alike from outside than from within.
From the outside perspective, i.e. as a Westerner, both of them share the same sacramental language, Sanskrit, and have also influenced each other by defining their tenets in opposition to each other. According to one of the sources quoted in the Wikipedia entry on Shankara:
From the outside perspective, i.e. as a Westerner, both of them share the same sacramental language, Sanskrit, and have also influenced each other by defining their tenets in opposition to each other. According to one of the sources quoted in the Wikipedia entry on Shankara:
S.N. Dasgupta (1997). History of Indian Philosophy, Volume 1. p. 494.Shankara and his followers borrowed much of their dialectic form of criticism from the Buddhists. His Brahman was very much like the sunya of Nagarjuna [...] The debts of Shankara to the self-luminosity of the Vijnanavada Buddhism can hardly be overestimated. There seems to be much truth in the accusations against Shankara by Vijnana Bhiksu and others that he was a hidden Buddhist himself. I am led to think that Shankara's philosophy is largely a compound of Vijnanavada and Sunyavada Buddhism with the Upanisad notion of the permanence of self superadded.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Without Buddhism -- especially without the influence of Nagarjuna and and at least some of the Buddhist logicians, Advaita would never have developed as much as it did. Granted it's just some wierd mold samples in Buddhism's petri dish. But without agar, nothing much grows there. Vedanta is an opportunistic growth in the rich context of Indian Buddhist culture.
So you can't dismiss their commonality out of hand so glibly, without ignoring historical context.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
This short article states an interesting position on Ramana Maharshi by Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche:
https://www.chronicleproject.com/a-con ... h-century/
Of course this is completely anecdotal and only represents the standpoint - or the recollection thereof - of Trungpa Rinpoche. Plus it might be argued if Ramana Maharshi could really be quoted as a Teacher of Advaita Vedanta, since he was representing no lineage etc.
https://www.chronicleproject.com/a-con ... h-century/
Of course this is completely anecdotal and only represents the standpoint - or the recollection thereof - of Trungpa Rinpoche. Plus it might be argued if Ramana Maharshi could really be quoted as a Teacher of Advaita Vedanta, since he was representing no lineage etc.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Steve Roth: “What about Krishnamurti?”
VCTR: “Arhat.” (long pause) … “Big baby.”
That's hilarious!
Rick (recovering Catholic and Krishnamurtian)
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
I pretty well aware of the historical context. Shankara went to great lengths to prophylactically reject the ideas that his POV was derived from Mahāyāna, as anyone who has actually read Shankara will know.Vaktar wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 6:50 pmWithout Buddhism -- especially without the influence of Nagarjuna and and at least some of the Buddhist logicians, Advaita would never have developed as much as it did. Granted it's just some wierd mold samples in Buddhism's petri dish. But without agar, nothing much grows there. Vedanta is an opportunistic growth in the rich context of Indian Buddhist culture.
So you can't dismiss their commonality out of hand so glibly, without ignoring historical context.
The main claim for Buddhist influence on Shankara comes from the fact that his paramaguru was a guy named Gaudapāda, the fourth chapter of whose Agamaśastra seems to borrow heavily from Madhyamaka and Yogacāra arguments, somewhat indiscriminately, to refute Samkhya and Vaiśesika scholars, and to propose ajativāda. However, given that Shankara does in fact go to great lengths to forestall the criticism of being a crypto-Buddhist, this should perhaps lead us to conclude that he wasn't a crypto-Buddhist,, and that his opponents such as Vijñāna Bhikṣu, Ramanuja, and so on, were all just a bit lazy in their thinking.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Off-topic discussion moved here: viewtopic.php?f=48&t=30308
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
I once read this meditation instruction for Advaita Vedanta, it was propagated by a very respectable student of Ramana Maharishi:
Now, if you have received Dzogchen instructions you will immediately understand that such an approach cannot be compatible with the Dzogchen view.Direct the awareness towards the totality of itself and exclude all phenomena.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Observing one's mind without distraction by "external phenomena" (the senses) is a technique taught in Mahamudra.fckw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:24 pm I once read this meditation instruction for Advaita Vedanta, it was propagated by a very respectable student of Ramana Maharishi:
Now, if you have received Dzogchen instructions you will immediately understand that such an approach cannot be compatible with the Dzogchen view.Direct the awareness towards the totality of itself and exclude all phenomena.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
You’re being a bit too liberal with your interpretation of Ramana Maharshi’s advice. He means “exclude all phenomena” in a literal sense, not simply as a temporary means to avoid distraction.Grigoris wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:43 amObserving one's mind without distraction by "external phenomena" (the senses) is a technique taught in Mahamudra.fckw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:24 pm I once read this meditation instruction for Advaita Vedanta, it was propagated by a very respectable student of Ramana Maharishi:
Now, if you have received Dzogchen instructions you will immediately understand that such an approach cannot be compatible with the Dzogchen view.Direct the awareness towards the totality of itself and exclude all phenomena.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
as I wrote here some 5 years ago viewtopic.php?f=63&t=15022&hilit=tatpur ... 40#p206108Donny wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 2:05 pm This short article states an interesting position on Ramana Maharshi by Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche:
https://www.chronicleproject.com/a-con ... h-century/
Of course this is completely anecdotal and only represents the standpoint - or the recollection thereof - of Trungpa Rinpoche. Plus it might be argued if Ramana Maharshi could really be quoted as a Teacher of Advaita Vedanta, since he was representing no lineage etc.
I know for certain of a good friend of mine who was personally advised by HH Lungtok Tenpai Nyima (Menri Trizin) to practise the methods of Ramana Maharshi
tp.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Are you sure you are not being too literal?
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
- treehuggingoctopus
- Posts: 2506
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:26 pm
- Location: EU
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
It is true that lots of Buddhist traditions, both within and outside Vajrayana, use the term "state without thoughts" (or an equivalent) to refer to a state that is in no way literally without thoughts. One wonders how RM's words are interpreted by Advaita teachers.
Them Bonpo heretics!
Générosité de l’invisible.
Notre gratitude est infinie.
Le critère est l’hospitalité.
Edmond Jabès
Notre gratitude est infinie.
Le critère est l’hospitalité.
Edmond Jabès
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
Indeed. We can't say with confidence what Ramana Maharshi's practice was because he never acknowledged students or appointed successors. The people who teach his methods didn't receive much direct instruction from him, unless you consider darshan to be instruction, but here in Team Buddhadharma we don't: and what the more prominent neo-Advaitan teachers teach as practice is an interpretation of what they thought RM was teaching them. So who knows...treehuggingoctopus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:19 pmIt is true that lots of Buddhist traditions, both within and outside Vajrayana, use the term "state without thoughts" (or an equivalent) to refer to a state that is in no way literally without thoughts. One wonders how RM's words are interpreted by Advaita teachers.
Re: Mind essence introduced in advaita and TB
While not everyone's cup of tea, this video on RM's teachings may be worth watching for those interested in such things: Jnani. There is a discussion of mind essence from the Advaita perspective. David Godman's comments are the highlight of the video, in my opinion.