The four kayas
The four kayas
Can someone give me some reference point for understanding the four kayas?
I've read definitions, seen the terms used in context, etc., but they don't make much sense to me.
I've read definitions, seen the terms used in context, etc., but they don't make much sense to me.
Cantankerous Buddha
Re: The four kayas
They are inseparable.
You can not have one without the others.
In other words, all are just aspects of Buddhahood.
You can not have one without the others.
In other words, all are just aspects of Buddhahood.
Re: The four kayas
The human BODY in its natural state is the Sambhogakāya
The human MIND in its natural state is the Dharmakaya (i.e. omniscience)
The human MIND in its natural state is the Dharmakaya (i.e. omniscience)
Re: The four kayas
I've gathered that frmo my reading. It still makes little sense to me. Plus, what about Nirmankaya?alwayson wrote:The human BODY in its natural state is the Sambhogakāya
The human MIND in its natural state is the Dharmakaya (i.e. omniscience)
Cantankerous Buddha
- conebeckham
- Posts: 5715
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Re: The four kayas
This present human body can be the Nirmanakaya, if one actualizes the realization of the Dharmakaya.
The Dharmakaya is the true, absolute Reality of Buddha, and is called the "Benefit for Oneself."
The form kayas are "seeming" manifestations of the Buddha, and are the "Benefit for Others."
Nirmanakaya can appear to deluded fortunate beings, while Sambhogakaya appears to Aryas, I believe.
But, FROM IT'S OWN SIDE, all is truly inseparable in the Dharmakaya, beyond conceptual understanding.
The Dharmakaya is the true, absolute Reality of Buddha, and is called the "Benefit for Oneself."
The form kayas are "seeming" manifestations of the Buddha, and are the "Benefit for Others."
Nirmanakaya can appear to deluded fortunate beings, while Sambhogakaya appears to Aryas, I believe.
But, FROM IT'S OWN SIDE, all is truly inseparable in the Dharmakaya, beyond conceptual understanding.
དམ་པའི་དོན་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ཆེ་བ་དང་།
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
Re: The four kayas
This is a species of Buddhist doceticism.Epistemes wrote:Can someone give me some reference point for understanding the four kayas?
I've read definitions, seen the terms used in context, etc., but they don't make much sense to me.
Dharmakāya, in brief, has several different versions. The basis version is that Dharmakāya is the complete realization of emptiness and the omniscience that springs from that realization.
Sambhogakāya is, in this basic version, rarified form body which exists outside samsara and is responsible primarily for communicating dharma to advanced bodhisattvas.
Nirmanakāya manifest to ordinary beings.
These terms get used differently in Vajrayāna systems where the three kāyas are understood as different aspects of the nature of the mind, clarity, emptiness and the inseparability of the two.
N
Re: The four kayas
Can Nirmanakaya manifest in subtler forms such as light forms or something?
Re: The four kayas
What about svabhavikakaya? My understanding of it is that it is the highest (greatest) of all the kayas and incorporates the other three - which seems to be suggesting that svabhavikakaya is synonymous with actual Buddhahood.Namdrol wrote: These terms get used differently in Vajrayāna systems where the three kāyas are understood as different aspects of the nature of the mind, clarity, emptiness and the inseparability of the two.
Cantankerous Buddha
Re: The four kayas
Svabhavikakaya denotes that the three kayas are inseparable by their nature. All sides of one coin, though they are described as three aspects. Dharmakaya is the enlightened truth itself. Sambhogakaya is it dancing, enjoying the union of emptiness and clarity in whatever form it likes. Nirmanakaya is it's creations, to tame and help sentient beings based on their karma. Svabhavika means natural, as in natural condition. Svabhavikakaya refers to the natural condition of the three kayas-- inseparable, not three but one.Epistemes wrote:What about svabhavikakaya? My understanding of it is that it is the highest (greatest) of all the kayas and incorporates the other three - which seems to be suggesting that svabhavikakaya is synonymous with actual Buddhahood.Namdrol wrote: These terms get used differently in Vajrayāna systems where the three kāyas are understood as different aspects of the nature of the mind, clarity, emptiness and the inseparability of the two.
Re: The four kayas
Is there any distinction in terms of the 4 kayas where the enlightened mind while remaining it's individuality also has access to all of reality at the same time with different kayas representing these aspects of individuality and ultimate expanse?
Re: The four kayas
It can be a name for the intrinsic idenitity of all three kāyas in Vajrayāna; in sutra, in general, it is a synonym of Dharmakāya.Epistemes wrote:What about svabhavikakaya? My understanding of it is that it is the highest (greatest) of all the kayas and incorporates the other three - which seems to be suggesting that svabhavikakaya is synonymous with actual Buddhahood.Namdrol wrote: These terms get used differently in Vajrayāna systems where the three kāyas are understood as different aspects of the nature of the mind, clarity, emptiness and the inseparability of the two.
N
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: The four kayas
What is then the "Rainbow Body of Great Transference" as possessed by Padmasambhava in this trikaya-doctrine?
Where does it fit in?
Where does it fit in?
Re: The four kayas
AilurusFulgens wrote:What is then the "Rainbow Body of Great Transference" as possessed by Padmasambhava in this trikaya-doctrine?
Where does it fit in?
Generally considered to be a sambhogakāya.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: The four kayas
So this would then perfectly fit with what "alwayson" posted i. e. "The human BODY in its natural state is the Sambhogakāya."Namdrol wrote:AilurusFulgens wrote:What is then the "Rainbow Body of Great Transference" as possessed by Padmasambhava in this trikaya-doctrine?
Where does it fit in?
Generally considered to be a sambhogakāya.
Is it therefore perfectly safe to say that this physical body of ours made of flesh, bones, sinews et al. is in its natural state a Sambhogakāya?
What about the Nirmānakāya? Is the following interpretation valid?
Nirmānakāya = ordinary physical body of flesh and bones (and nothing else)
Or can there be also other interpretations to the Nirmānakāya?
- conebeckham
- Posts: 5715
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Re: The four kayas
I think there are two key points to always keep in mind....First, all three of these "bodies," or four, if you add Svabhavakaya, (which is really a sort of summation, or, as Namdrol pointed out, sometimes a synonym for Dharmakaya), are inseparable in truth.
So, to say Nirmanakaya is only the flesh-and-blood body is incorrect, as this Nirmanakaya is primordially inseparable with the Dharmakaya.
Second, it is the Dharmakaya which is to be realized by the practitioner. Having actualized the Dharmakaya, which we can say is something like "The Buddha Mind," the "Buddha Bodies" manifest unimpededly.
As for the Sambhogakaya being the "physical body in it's natural state," I don't think there is a such a thing as the "Natural State of the Physical body." If you're talking about Light Bodies, then it's not really appropriate to say they are "physical," is it?
So, to say Nirmanakaya is only the flesh-and-blood body is incorrect, as this Nirmanakaya is primordially inseparable with the Dharmakaya.
Second, it is the Dharmakaya which is to be realized by the practitioner. Having actualized the Dharmakaya, which we can say is something like "The Buddha Mind," the "Buddha Bodies" manifest unimpededly.
As for the Sambhogakaya being the "physical body in it's natural state," I don't think there is a such a thing as the "Natural State of the Physical body." If you're talking about Light Bodies, then it's not really appropriate to say they are "physical," is it?
དམ་པའི་དོན་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ཆེ་བ་དང་།
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
Re: The four kayas
conebeckham wrote:
As for the Sambhogakaya being the "physical body in it's natural state," I don't think there is a such a thing as the "Natural State of the Physical body." If you're talking about Light Bodies, then it's not really appropriate to say they are "physical," is it?
The rūpakāya is two fold. Rūpa here means material. Light is a part of matter since it is an object of the eye.
N
- conebeckham
- Posts: 5715
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Re: The four kayas
AOK, got it! Thanks.Namdrol wrote:conebeckham wrote:
As for the Sambhogakaya being the "physical body in it's natural state," I don't think there is a such a thing as the "Natural State of the Physical body." If you're talking about Light Bodies, then it's not really appropriate to say they are "physical," is it?
The rūpakāya is two fold. Rūpa here means material. Light is a part of matter since it is an object of the eye.
N
So, would you say that the "light Body" (which, I suppose, is the Sambhogakaya?) is "the Natural State Body?"
དམ་པའི་དོན་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ཆེ་བ་དང་།
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")