He is a Virgo (ascendant). It is his natural inclination to analyze in a critical way to organize the complex myre of Buddhist ideas. It's his strong point and he can see subtle naunce that many times others cannot.heart wrote:Yes, of course you do Namdrol. For you everything have to be separated as high or low. It is an intellectual discipline you probably nurtured for many lifetimes.Namdrol wrote:Jnana wrote: Tsele Natsok Rangdröl indicates otherwise. The Circle of the Sun:...
Honestly, I think this analysis by this master is a bit misleading
Let me give you a tip-- whenever you really want to understand a subject, especially one that is very complex, find a master of that subject who has Virgo placed in his or her ascendant or moon etc. This kind of person puts the majority of their energy into analysis. When I mean analysis, I mean detailed freakin analysis. I don't mean petty petty non-Virgoan analysis.
A lot of people just can't keep up with Virgoan analysis. It'd too deep, too calculating, too insightful, too dedicated, and way too freakin' fast for them. In short, they are experts at analyzing. For example, those people who wrote the texts refuting schools because of their usage of alaya without properly understanding the specific usage of the terminology used, those people were not Virgos. They were failed analysts.
We need Virgos.