Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
I do NOT want to hash out a whole argument on rebirth. I have often been asked this one question that I honestly don't know how to answer because I'm not qualified, but it has been bugging me now for some time. According to my own studies (Nyingma tradition) there is no solid 'self' thing or anything to call a 'soul.' So when I'm asked about 'reincarnation' by non-buddhists I flat out deny it, "Buddhism does not ascribe to 'reincarnation'' then they say, "What about rebirth" at which point I just say I'm not qualified to speak on the matter-because I'm not. I'm a newb. It's good practice for reducing self-importance to look like an dolt on a regular basis in showing you don't know something. In my studies I've come to understand that there is nothing to 'reincarnate' - however the issue is complex because of the 12 links of DO we have ignorance as the cause and desire and nama and rupa etc etc, so something continues to grasp for form, for being...
I beg our members here to please NOT make this into a thread about rebirth's validity or not (as threads around this questions often degenerate and polarize), I'm not interested in that - in this sense, I have no questions around validity, in practice i just want to understand what is being asked and perhaps gain better insight myself in terms of "what moves on" into new form in rebirth - and how the cycle goes on and on... Is it the deepest part of consciousness (alaya)? What is it in me that will continue to grasp with desire out of ignorance into new form and find new ways to compound new karma?
I beg our members here to please NOT make this into a thread about rebirth's validity or not (as threads around this questions often degenerate and polarize), I'm not interested in that - in this sense, I have no questions around validity, in practice i just want to understand what is being asked and perhaps gain better insight myself in terms of "what moves on" into new form in rebirth - and how the cycle goes on and on... Is it the deepest part of consciousness (alaya)? What is it in me that will continue to grasp with desire out of ignorance into new form and find new ways to compound new karma?
Made from 100% recycled karma
The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum
"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy
The Heart Drive - nosce te ipsum
"To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget." –Arundhati Roy
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Hi Ogyen,
If you don't mind a fellow newb weighing in, let me just say that from what I've seen, when the Buddha is asked questions such as these, he typically replies "from ignorance as a requisite condition come fabrications. From fabrications as a requisite condition comes consciousness..." etc.
In other words, what moves on is the process of dependent origination, and "we" are the recurring products of that process. And that seems to have been about all the Buddha would say on the matter.
Alaya consciousness, if I remember rightly, was proposed by the Yogacara philosophers in order to address certain logical problems regarding "mind moments", and it also provides an elegant model of how psychological/karmic continuity can operate over multiple lifetimes (or even one lifetime) in the absence of a permanent Self.
If you don't mind a fellow newb weighing in, let me just say that from what I've seen, when the Buddha is asked questions such as these, he typically replies "from ignorance as a requisite condition come fabrications. From fabrications as a requisite condition comes consciousness..." etc.
In other words, what moves on is the process of dependent origination, and "we" are the recurring products of that process. And that seems to have been about all the Buddha would say on the matter.
Alaya consciousness, if I remember rightly, was proposed by the Yogacara philosophers in order to address certain logical problems regarding "mind moments", and it also provides an elegant model of how psychological/karmic continuity can operate over multiple lifetimes (or even one lifetime) in the absence of a permanent Self.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Delusion and nothing more, that is what "moves". Which delusion? The delusion "I am".Ogyen wrote:I do NOT want to hash out a whole argument on rebirth. I have often been asked this one question that I honestly don't know how to answer because I'm not qualified, but it has been bugging me now for some time. According to my own studies (Nyingma tradition) there is no solid 'self' thing or anything to call a 'soul.' So when I'm asked about 'reincarnation' by non-buddhists I flat out deny it, "Buddhism does not ascribe to 'reincarnation'' then they say, "What about rebirth" at which point I just say I'm not qualified to speak on the matter-because I'm not. I'm a newb. It's good practice for reducing self-importance to look like an dolt on a regular basis in showing you don't know something. In my studies I've come to understand that there is nothing to 'reincarnate' - however the issue is complex because of the 12 links of DO we have ignorance as the cause and desire and nama and rupa etc etc, so something continues to grasp for form, for being...
I beg our members here to please NOT make this into a thread about rebirth's validity or not (as threads around this questions often degenerate and polarize), I'm not interested in that - in this sense, I have no questions around validity, in practice i just want to understand what is being asked and perhaps gain better insight myself in terms of "what moves on" into new form in rebirth - and how the cycle goes on and on... Is it the deepest part of consciousness (alaya)? What is it in me that will continue to grasp with desire out of ignorance into new form and find new ways to compound new karma?
- retrofuturist
- Former staff member
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:54 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Greetings,
Maitri,
Retro.
Namdrol wrote:Which delusion? The delusion "I am".
Maitri,
Retro.
Live in concord, with mutual appreciation, without disputing, blending like milk and water, viewing each other with kindly eyes.
- Wesley1982
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
- Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
I imagine the Buddha would simplify it for you. Other ppl make it more complicated than it seems
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Collectively it is the mental aggregates, which are a dependently-originated karmic reaction fundamentally driven by ignorance of reality (hence subject to perishing), that are reborn. There is no "self" in a concrete sense, but there is a reaction between causes and conditions which leads to the continued existence of a sentient being.Ogyen wrote:In my studies I've come to understand that there is nothing to 'reincarnate' - however the issue is complex because of the 12 links of DO we have ignorance as the cause and desire and nama and rupa etc etc, so something continues to grasp for form, for being...
In explaining such things a general audience it is best just to say the mind is reborn. The mind, however, is not absolute either and is dependently originated just as much as a physical body is.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Indeed.Huseng wrote: In explaining such things a general audience it is best just to say the mind is reborn. The mind, however, is not absolute either and is dependently originated just as much as a physical body is.
I often see that there is a big thing made about a difference made between rebirth and reincarnation. IMHO, both are fine terms to use in a Buddhist explanation of things. The mind is reincarnated in another body (asuming it's in a form realm). It's just that the mind is not a self/soul etc. - just a deluded continuum.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
According to Highest Yoga Tantra it's the most subtle level of consciousness - clear light - which moves from life to life and which also carries the seeds of karma and delusion.Ogyen wrote: Is it the deepest part of consciousness (alaya)? What is it in me that will continue to grasp with desire out of ignorance into new form and find new ways to compound new karma?
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
There is the Salistamba sutra, which is a mahayana sutra that explains the twelve links of dependent origination. It answers the question 'what reincarnates?' with several metaphors, one of the metaphors is that the moon in the sky doesn't move into the pond where it is reflected, yet it is accurately reflected there, and the sutra continues that nothing moves from this life to the next, yet the consequences of deeds are never lost but appear accurately in a new life.Ogyen wrote:I do NOT want to hash out a whole argument on rebirth. I have often been asked this one question that I honestly don't know how to answer because I'm not qualified, but it has been bugging me now for some time. According to my own studies (Nyingma tradition) there is no solid 'self' thing or anything to call a 'soul.' So when I'm asked about 'reincarnation' by non-buddhists I flat out deny it, "Buddhism does not ascribe to 'reincarnation'' then they say, "What about rebirth" at which point I just say I'm not qualified to speak on the matter-because I'm not. I'm a newb. It's good practice for reducing self-importance to look like an dolt on a regular basis in showing you don't know something. In my studies I've come to understand that there is nothing to 'reincarnate' - however the issue is complex because of the 12 links of DO we have ignorance as the cause and desire and nama and rupa etc etc, so something continues to grasp for form, for being...
I beg our members here to please NOT make this into a thread about rebirth's validity or not (as threads around this questions often degenerate and polarize), I'm not interested in that - in this sense, I have no questions around validity, in practice i just want to understand what is being asked and perhaps gain better insight myself in terms of "what moves on" into new form in rebirth - and how the cycle goes on and on... Is it the deepest part of consciousness (alaya)? What is it in me that will continue to grasp with desire out of ignorance into new form and find new ways to compound new karma?
Salistamba sutra is available in two english translations. David Ross Reat has done a life time of work for his translation, it is a piece of meticulous translation.
They say that in the past hundreds of commentaries were written for this sutra, and that it had more commentaries than any other sutra.
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
One candle lights another. What goes forward?
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
In the commentaries of the Salistamba sutra I have heard, it says that the third link, vijñana, is the alaya, so it arises dependently, and so on...
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Nagāgarjuna opines:Huseng wrote: Collectively it is the mental aggregates, which are a dependently-originated karmic reaction fundamentally driven by ignorance of reality (hence subject to perishing), that are reborn. There is no "self" in a concrete sense, but there is a reaction between causes and conditions which leads to the continued existence of a sentient being.
In explaining such things a general audience it is best just to say the mind is reborn. The mind, however, is not absolute either and is dependently originated just as much as a physical body is.
- Although the aggregates are serially connected,
the wise are to comprehend nothing has transmigrated
In that respect, the aggregates are the aggregates of matter, sensation, ideation, formations and consciousness. Those are termed ‘serially connected’. Not having ceased, they produce another produced from that cause. Nevertheless, not even a subtle particle of an existent has transmigrated from this world to the next. That being the case, the wheel of samsara is created by the traces of erroneous concepts.
The so called "Prasanga" branch of Madhyamaka generally rejects the idea that consciousness transmigrates.
N
- Dechen Norbu
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:50 pm
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Cool thread . Could be pinned, I guess.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
does a brick need an enduring self in order for it to continue and function from one moment to the next?
if not then whats the problem with the mind functioning from one moment to the next, even if we're talking about the last moment of this life and the first moment of the next life
if not then whats the problem with the mind functioning from one moment to the next, even if we're talking about the last moment of this life and the first moment of the next life
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
This is one perspective. Vasubandhu had a different idea (see 18a-d):Namdrol wrote: Nagāgarjuna opines:
- Although the aggregates are serially connected,
the wise are to comprehend nothing has transmigrated
In that respect, the aggregates are the aggregates of matter, sensation, ideation, formations and consciousness. Those are termed ‘serially connected’. Not having ceased, they produce another produced from that cause. Nevertheless, not even a subtle particle of an existent has transmigrated from this world to the next. That being the case, the wheel of samsara is created by the traces of erroneous concepts.
The so called "Prasanga" branch of Madhyamaka generally rejects the idea that consciousness transmigrates.
N
However, I don't think these two ideas are mutually exclusive. On one level skandhas carry on as Vasubandhu explains, but at a deeper level the process is fundamentally a result of avidyā. On a conventional level there is a person. On a deeper level, there are the skandhas and no person. Going further, there are no skandhas to be found under analysis.
I think when addressing questions from a general audience it is best to use Vasubandhu's explanation because people are prone to ask, "If there is no self, what is it that is reborn?"
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Reminds me of this (really worth reading imo)The so called "Prasanga" branch of Madhyamaka generally rejects the idea that consciousness transmigrates.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Vasubandhu's perspective is vastly inferior to that of Nāgārjuna in my opinion.Huseng wrote: This is one perspective. Vasubandhu had a different idea (see 18a-d):
N
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
Seems to make sense to regard rebirth as occurring moment to moment, anytime the "I" arises and subsequent imputation (predicated on said "I") proliferates. Due to this initial misapprehension a resultant chain of imputed conceptualization gives rise to varying notions of duality. These apparent dualities in turn manifest all conceivable distinctions and designations (time, space, existence, nonexistence, self, other and any other form of dichotomous misconception). Apart from the utter delusion these (apparently obscuring) factors create, every imaginable aspect of this inconceivable reality (which is beyond the 4 extremes) is unborn.
"The actual essence, pristine rigpa,
cannot be improved upon, so virtue is profitless,
and it cannot be impaired, so vice is harmless;
in it's absence of karma there is no ripening of pleasure or pain;
in it's absence of judgement, no preference for samsara or nirvana;
in it's absence of articulation, it has no dimension;
in it's absence of past and future, rebirth is an empty notion;
who is there to transmigrate? And how to wander?
What is karma and how can it mature?
Contemplate the reality that is like the clear sky!
Constantly deconstructing, investigating keenly,
not even the slightest substance can be found;
and in the undivided moment of nondual perception
we abide in the natural state of perfection."
- Longchenpa
"The actual essence, pristine rigpa,
cannot be improved upon, so virtue is profitless,
and it cannot be impaired, so vice is harmless;
in it's absence of karma there is no ripening of pleasure or pain;
in it's absence of judgement, no preference for samsara or nirvana;
in it's absence of articulation, it has no dimension;
in it's absence of past and future, rebirth is an empty notion;
who is there to transmigrate? And how to wander?
What is karma and how can it mature?
Contemplate the reality that is like the clear sky!
Constantly deconstructing, investigating keenly,
not even the slightest substance can be found;
and in the undivided moment of nondual perception
we abide in the natural state of perfection."
- Longchenpa
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
nope, otherwise you would be an entirely different person each moment, and thats not true. nor is it true that when you eat a french fry you end up eating 100s of them the longer you chew that one fry.asunthatneversets wrote:Seems to make sense to regard rebirth as occurring moment to moment
the tough part of this basic version of dependent arising is understanding is that while things are momentary, nevertheless objects function over time.
Re: Question about "what moves on" in rebirth
I have assumed that there is no specific "thing" that remains from moment to moment, but rather my existence is a sequence of a multitude of "things", which all share a common property of belonging to (and constituting) my mind-stream. This is why my consciousness is separate from others, etc. There is nothing special about death, just things disappearing and appearing, which it what they constantly do anyway. Am I wrong?